The DOI matches its Crossref record; 216 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 182 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration
Open accessAbstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world. Although the etiology and pathogenesis of AMD remain largely unclear, a complex interaction of genetic and environmental factors is thought to exist. AMD pathology is characterized by degeneration involving the retinal photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium, and Bruch’s membrane, as well as, in some cases, alterations in choroidal capillaries. Recent research on the genetic and molecular underpinnings of AMD brings to light several basic molecular pathways and pathophysiological processes that might mediate AMD risk, progression, and/or response to therapy. This review summarizes, in detail, the molecular pathological findings in both humans and animal models, including genetic variations in CFH, CX3CR1, and ARMS2/HtrA1, as well as the role of numerous molecules implicated in inflammation, apoptosis, cholesterol trafficking, angiogenesis, and oxidative stress.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
144 Not checked yet · 38 No basis given · 31 Own interpretation · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
In the paper
“We recently found no relationship between risk-conferring CFH variant and C. pneumoniae in 148 advanced AMD patients and 162 control subjects with the infection”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shen et al., 2008
plainn = 148- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“although there is a positive association between AMD and C. pneumoniae infection (20% vs. 10% positive C. pneumoniae DNA detected in the blood of AMD patients compared with the controls) (Shen et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shen et al., 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This previous study showed that CX3CR1 transcript and protein in the AMD maculae were undetectable or expressed at much lower levels than their SNP-type counterparts in the normal eyes.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chan et al., 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“we found lowered CX3CR1 expression in the macula compared with the perimacular retina of AMD eyes bearing T280M.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chan et al., 2005
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In normal eyes, macular cells from an individual bearing “at risk” allele T/M280 exhibited lower CX3CR1 transcript expression than an individual bearing “wild type or major” allele T280T.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chan et al., 2005
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast, similar levels of CX3CR1 expression were detected in macular and perimacular regions of the normal subjects”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chan et al., 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our data, including a population-based study (Wang et al., 2008), and data by Jakobsdottir and colleagues (Jakobsdottir et al., 2005) have both shown that the frequency of the ARMS2 risk allele is higher in patients with advanced AMD than in those with early or intermediate AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similar to findings by Feher and colleagues (Feher et al., 2006), we have also found a drastic decrease in normal mitochondria in the photoreceptors and RPE cells of the AMD eyes as compared to that of the normal age-control eyes (Fig. 5).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Feher et al., 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“We have also found the association between ApoE112R (E4) and a decreased risk of AMD development, and the underlying mechanisms might involve differential regulation of both CCL2 and VEGF by the ApoE isoforms (Bojanowski et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.5. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bojanowski et al., 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Compared to wild-type mice, Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− mice exhibited increased complement C3 and CD46.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These mice also exhibited ultrastructural signs of AMD such as accumulation of lipofuscin granules, as well as increased the N-retinylidene–N-retinylethanolamine (A2E) accumulation on biochemical analysis (Chan et al., 2008; Tuo et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Incubation of normal retinal sections with serum from Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− also demonstrated the presence of anti-retinal antibodies in the mouse model.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross et al., 2008 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Analysis of C3d expression by immunoreactivity revealed that this increase was especially notable in Bruch’s membrane, drusen-like lesions, photoreceptors, RPE, and choroidal capillaries (Ross et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast, minimal anti-retinal auto-antibody effect was noted in wild-type mice (Ross et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross et al., 2008 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“studies have shown that the most established factors are advanced age, cigarette smoking, diet, and race (Coleman et al., 2008; Jager et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coleman et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Jager et al., 2008 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The majority of studies have found a statistically significant association between smoking and development of AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein, 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The AREDS demonstrated the efficacy of zinc-antioxidant supplements for preventing or delaying progression of early AMD to late AMD in patients who are at high risk (Bressler et al., 2003).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bressler et al., 2003 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A recent population-based cohort study in Australia (Tan et al., 2008) demonstrated that high dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake reduced the risk of long-term incident AMD”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tan et al., 2008 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The large drusen, bilateral drusen, and/or numerous drusen, are significant risk factors for development of late stage AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The presence of inflammation-related molecules in drusen suggests the possible involvement of the immune system in AMD pathogenesis (Hageman et al., 2001).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hageman et al., 2001 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“high beta-carotene intake was associated with an increased risk of AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tan et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several family studies have shown that patients with a family history of AMD are at increased risk (Seddon et al., 2007; Smith and Mitchell, 1998).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Seddon et al., 2007 source
- Not checked yetcites Smith and Mitchell, 1998
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Classically, subretinal, extracellular deposits composed of glycoproteins and lipids accumulate in Bruch’s membrane. These dumbbell shaped deposits are called drusen”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The earliest pathological changes are the appearance of basal laminar deposits (BlamD) and basal linear deposits (BlinL) (Green and Enger, 1993).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Green and Enger, 1993 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The results showed that for AMD, the population-attributable risk (PAR) for a positive family history was 0.34.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Luo et al., 2008 source
plainn = 4,764- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the presence of large and many drusen in the macula signifies early AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the earliest stage, they may be visible ophthalmoscopically, when their diameter exceeds 25 µm (Sarks et al., 1999)”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sarks et al., 1999 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many linkage and association studies have indicated that the most replicated signals reside on chromosome 1q25–31 and 10q26 (Fisher et al., 2005; Jakobsdottir et al., 2005; Klein et al., 1998; Majewski et al., 2003).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Complement components, other inflammatory molecules, lipids, lipoproteins B and E, and glycoproteins are common constituents of ocular drusen (Johnson et al., 2002).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al., 2002 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of studies have illustrated the presence of complement components and complement regulatory proteins in drusen and nearby RPE of AMD patients”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The primary clinical characteristic of late stage ‘dry’ AMD is the appearance of RPE atrophy, usually known as geographic atrophy.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RAP, however, occurs much less frequently than the classical choroid-derived neovascular vessels.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“new vessels sprouting from the choroidal vessels, penetrating Bruch’s membrane and growing into the subretinal space are the classical descriptions of wet AMD (Green, 1999), which is most common”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Green, 1999
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AMD is no exception, as SNPs associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, angiogenesis, and other pathological processes have been linked to AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.1. Single nucleotide polymorphism
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“dysregulation of the cascade can result in complement overactivation-mediated damage to nearby healthy tissue.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Immunohistochemical analyses have shown various molecular constituents, such as apolipoproteins B and E, different immunoglobulins, factor X, amyloid P component, amyloid β, complement C5 and C5b-9 terminal complexes, fibrinogen, vitronectin, and others, to be present in all phenotypes of hard and soft drusen”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Hyperpigmentary changes associated with compensatory RPE cell proliferation are frequently observed at the periphery of these hypopigmented areas (de Jong, 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites de Jong, 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Activation of the complement system generates a variety of pro-inflammatory responses, including the production of membrane-attack complexes (MAC) which lead to cell lysis, release of chemokines to mediate recruitment of inflammatory cells, and enhancement of capillary permeability (Walport, 2001a, b).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walport, 2001a, b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These studies have been buttressed by genetic studies identifying inflammation-associated SNPs that modulate AMD risk.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“elevated serum level of CRP has been shown to be associated with AMD (Mold et al., 1999; Seddon et al., 2004).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“CFH is a negative regulator of the complement system.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Johnson and associates illustrated that individuals homozygous for the risk-conferring Y402H CFH variant have higher levels of CRP in the choroid compared to individuals homozygous for the “normal” Y402 variant.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al., 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“several studies have demonstrated that animal models with complement knockdown, either genetically or with pharmacological agents such as anti-complement antibodies, exhibit decreased CNV after laser injury”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Patel and Chan, 2008
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CFH is now widely accepted as an important AMD susceptibility gene, harboring variants and haplotypes associated with increased and reduced disease risk.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“CFH is identified in normal RPE and choroid (Klein et al., 2005).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein et al., 2005 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The risk-conferring Y402H CFH variant (genotype CC) has also been reported to reduce the binding affinity to C-reactive protein (CRP), a pro-inflammatory molecule, as compared with the Y402Y variant (genotype TT).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A major AMD-associated SNP is the Y402H (tyrosine to histidine substitution at amino acid 402) variant of complement factor H (CFH) (Edwards et al., 2005; Hageman et al., 2005; Haines et al., 2005; Klein et al., 2005).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, C. pneumoniae has been found in AMD neovascular membranes (Kalayoglu et al., 2005).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kalayoglu et al., 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a recent study demonstrating that the presence of the risk-conferring CFH variant and high C. pneumoniae antibody titer significantly increases AMD risk, well beyond the risk associated with possessing either risk factor alone (Baird et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baird et al., 2008 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results support the notion that the association between CFH polymorphisms and AMD may involve CRP.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The three SNPs at rs1061147, rs1061170, and rs380390 are in complete linkage disequilibrium (LD).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to the CFH Y402H (dbSNP ID: rs1061170) SNP, 5 other CFH variants (rs3753394, rs800292, rs1061147, rs1061170, rs380390, and rs1329428) have been reported in AMD association studies.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The particular SNPs associated with AMD, however, depend upon the study and the study population.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among them, the rs1061170 (Y402H) was the only SNP that leads to a non-synonymous amino acid change.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast, there is no significant difference between the two phenotypes (YY and HH) in the amount of CFH protein in the RPE-choroid complex (Johnson et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al., 2006 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C. pneumoniae is a potent activator of the alternative complement system”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, studies to date demonstrate an association between CFH and AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the Chinese and Japanese populations, only three of these CFH SNPs–at rs1329428, rs800292 (I62V), and rs3753394, but not at rs1061170 (Y402H)–were associated with risk of exudative AMD (Chen et al., 2006; Okamoto et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Okamoto et al., 2006
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These SNPs have been reported to be major genetic factors for developing AMD in Caucasians (Edwards et al., 2005; Hageman et al., 2005; Haines et al., 2005; Klein et al., 2005; Tuo et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results suggest that the zinc plus antioxidative treatment seems to have less impact on those with the high-risk CFH variant.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the SNP variant rs2511989 located in the SERPING1 gene encoding the complement component 1 (C1) inhibitor was recently reported to occur less frequently in AMD cases than in control subjects (Ennis et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ennis et al., 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, CFH may not be directly involved in the pathogenesis of C. pneumoniae infection-mediated AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
hedgedn = 148- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the fast migrating allotype (C3F), has been reported to be strongly associated with AMD in a study from English and Scottish populations (Yates et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yates et al., 2007 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a French study, homozygosity for the CX3CR1 T280M allele was also reported to be associated with AMD (Combadiere et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Combadiere et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“studies have demonstrated that at least one of the two variants associated with AMD—R32Q BF—leads to an impairment in the complement activating function of BF (Gold et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gold et al., 2006 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One study reported that C7 (rs2876849) is protective for AMD development in Caucasians (Dinu et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dinu et al., 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, a similar interaction was observed in the groups taking zinc versus those taking no zinc: zinc intake had a more dramatic protective effect in patients with non-risk alleles, compared with patients with risk alleles.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein et al., 2008a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This glomerulonephritis shares some similarities with AMD—namely, a role for uncontrolled alternative complement activation as well as the accumulation of complement-containing extracellular deposits.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, much like impaired CFH-mediated complement inhibition confers AMD risk, decreased complement activation by BF might serve to protect against AMD risk.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The results show that only 10.5% of patients with the risk-conferring Y402H/Y402H phenotype demonstrated improved vision with treatment, compared with 53.7% of patients with the Y402Y/Y402Y and Y402Y/Y402H CFH variants (P = 0.004) (Brantley et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brantley et al., 2008
plaincorrelationaln = 86- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Subsequent studies, for example by Despriet and Edwards, however, demonstrated no significant association of the D299G TLR4 SNP with AMD risk (Despriet et al., 2008; Edwards et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“SNPs in other pro-inflammatory chemokines including interleukin-1β (IL1β) C511T, interleukin-6 (IL6) C174G and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10 G1082A were analyzed and showed no significant association with AMD (Goverdhan et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goverdhan et al., 2008 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Their immunohistochemical analysis of AMD cases suggest that CX3CR1-positive microglial cells accumulated subretinally in affected areas of the macula”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Combadiere et al., 2007 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Taiwan Chinese carriers of the IL8 C781T variant, independent to the CFH Y402H variant, have also been shown to be at increased risk of developing wet AMD (Tsai et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tsai et al., 2008 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The AA genotype has also been shown to induce angiogenesis in rat cornea (Koch et al., 1992).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Koch et al., 1992 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“which suggested that CX3CR1-mediated decreases in inflammatory cell chemokinesis might contribute to age-related changes in the macula (Chan et al., 2005; Tuo et al., 2004)”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chan et al., 2005
- Not checked yetcites Tuo et al., 2004 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Heterozygozity at the ARMS2/LOC387715 (A69A/A69S) is associated with odds ratio (OR) of 1.69–3.0 for advanced AMD, while homozygosity for the risk conferring allele (A69S/A69S) results in an OR of 2.20–12.1, after controlling for demographic and behavioral risk factors (Ross et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A genome-wide scan and genetic linkage analysis of 70 families with AMD suggests that chromosome 10q26 may contain a common AMD gene (Majewski et al., 2003).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Majewski et al., 2003 source
hedgedcorrelationaln = 70- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The risk-conferring ARMS2/LOC387715 SNP, A69S, is associated with AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Heterozygozity at the ARMS2/LOC387715 (A69A/A69S) is associated with odds ratio (OR) of 1.69–3.0 for advanced AMD, while homozygosity for the risk conferring allele (A69S/A69S) results in an OR of 2.20–12.1, after controlling for demographic and behavioral risk factors (Ross et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The association of ARMS2 gene with AMD, especially advanced AMD, susceptibility has now been replicated in numbers of independent studies (Conley et al., 2006; Rivera et al., 2005; Ross et al., 2007; Schmidt et al., 2006; Seddon et al., 2007; Kanda et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, an even stronger effects on AMD risk has been noted in patients with both the risk-conferring ARMS2 variant and elevated serum levels of several inflammatory markers including CRP, IL-6, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) (Wang et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang et al., 2008 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the same study, individuals homozygous for the risk allele (genotype AA) expressed higher levels of HtrA1 in their circulating lymphocytes in vivo, compared with individuals homozygous for the non-risk variant (genotype GG).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a consequence, expression of ARMS2 in homozygous carriers of the deletion-insertion variant is absent, or at least sufficiently low to be experimentally undetectable.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, studies have shown that human donor AMD eyes contain higher levels of protein adducts resulting from the oxidative modification of carbohydrates and lipids (Crabb et al., 2002; Howes et al., 2004) and higher levels of antioxidant enzymes (Decanini et al., 2007; Frank et al., 1999) compared with non-AMD eyes, which indicate that oxidative stress plays an important role in AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As rs11200638 is located within a CpG island of the proximal promoter, 512 bp upstream of the HtrA1 transcription start site, the risk allele “A” of HtrA1 SNP was shown to enhance HtrA1 transcription in vitro in RPE cell lines (Dewan et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dewan et al., 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Kanda et al. reported that ARMS2 is localized to the ellipsoid region of the photoreceptors in retina, where most of the mitochondria are located (Kanda et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kanda et al., 2007 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“More recently, Fritsche et al. showed that a deletion-insertion polymorphism (*372_815delins54), which resides within the 3′-UTR of the ARMS2 gene, also associates very significantly with AMD (Fritsche et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fritsche et al., 2008 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“We have also found the association between ApoE112R (E4) and a decreased risk of AMD development, and the underlying mechanisms might involve differential regulation of both CCL2 and VEGF by the ApoE isoforms (Bojanowski et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.5. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bojanowski et al., 2006 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Elevated expression of HtrA1 mRNA and/or protein in the drusen and CNV components in AMD patients carrying the AA risk genotype has been reported in several studies (Cameron et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2007; Tuo et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2006) (Fig. 6).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These findings suggest a possible role for ApoE in AMD pathology via retinal lipid trafficking (Ishida et al., 2004).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.5. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ishida et al., 2004 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In AMD patients, the presence of ApoE has been illustrated in drusen (Shanmugaratnam et al., 1997).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.5. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shanmugaratnam et al., 1997 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“VEGF plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD, and recently, therapies targeting VEGF have shown promising results of significant improvement of central vision and reduction of CNV (Wylegala and Teper, 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.6. VEGF
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wylegala and Teper, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the exact biological roles of both the ARMS2 and HtrA1 genes in humans are unclear, SNP analyses have confirmed their association with AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, a large, population-based, cross-sectional study (n = 10,139) using participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study found no association between AMD and any of the ApoE alleles in Australia (Kaur et al., 2006; Schmidt et al., 2005; Schultz et al., 2003; Wong et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.5. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE)
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is ample evidence that inflammation plays an important role in both dry and wet AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that DNA repair mechanisms may play a role in AMD pathogenesis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.7. ERCC6
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several groups have demonstrated the presence of macrophages at neovascular membranes in wet AMD (Dastgheib and Green, 1994; Grossniklaus et al., 2002; Penfold et al., 2001).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.1. Macrophages
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dastgheib and Green, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Grossniklaus et al., 2002
- Not checked yetcites Penfold et al., 2001 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“They identified variants in one allele of the gene in 16% of the AMD patients (Allikmets, 1997; Allikmets et al., 1997).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.8. ATP-binding cassette sub-family, member 4 (ABCA4)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Allikmets, 1997
- Not checked yetcites Allikmets et al., 1997
plaincorrelationaln = 167- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, multiple subsequent studies showed little or no relation of ABCA4 mutations with AMD (Bojanowski et al., 2005; De La Paz et al., 1999; Souied et al., 2000; Stone et al., 1998).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.8. ATP-binding cassette sub-family, member 4 (ABCA4)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bojanowski et al., 2005
- Not checked yetcites De La Paz et al., 1999 source
- Not checked yetcites Souied et al., 2000
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, macrophages in CNV lesions have been shown to express proangiogenic factors such as VEGF and tissue factor (Csaky et al., 2004; Grossniklaus et al., 2002).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.1. Macrophages
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Csaky et al., 2004 source
- Not checked yetcites Grossniklaus et al., 2002
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While AMD is not a classic inflammatory disease like uveitis; inflammatory cells, in particular the macrophages, have been histologically demonstrated near AMD lesions, including in areas of Bruch membrane breakdown, RPE atrophy, and choroidal neovascularization (Coleman et al., 2008; Dastgheib and Green, 1994; Green, 1999; Grossniklaus et al., 2002; Lopez et al., 1993; Penfold et al., 2001).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.1. Macrophages
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coleman et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Dastgheib and Green, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Green, 1999
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A disease OR of 23 was conferred by homozygosity for risk alleles at both ERCC6 and CFH compared with homozygosity for non-risk alleles.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.7. ERCC6
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, Richardson et al. (2007) provided a thorough tag-SNP based examination and found little evidence to support an association of the VEGF-A gene with AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.6. VEGF
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Richardson et al., 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As described above, the CX3CR1 chemokine receptor found on microglia has been shown to harbor SNPs (T280M and V249I) that have been associated with increased risk of AMD in some reports (Chan et al., 2005; Tuo et al., 2004).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.2. Microglia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chan et al., 2005
- Not checked yetcites Tuo et al., 2004 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since microglia are already present in the retina since embryological development and do not chemotactically enter the retina, these SNPs might lead to impaired microglial migration or egress from the retina, resulting in accumulation of microglia.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.2. Microglia
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Eventually, by 16–18 months of age, Ccl2−/− and Ccr2−/− mice also develop geographic RPE atrophy and choroidal neovascularization.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The notion that microglia contribute to drusen-like deposits is further strengthened by another study demonstrating that increasing fundus autofluorescence seen in aging wild-type mice consists of perivascular and subretinal microglia, which might also contain lipofuscin granules (Xu et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xu et al., 2008
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the presence of macrophages at CNV lesions is largely recognized, the role of these macrophages presents some controversy as to whether these macrophages serve an adaptive role to combat CNV or a causative role in inducing CNV.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.1. Macrophages
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, the Ccl2−/− and Ccr2−/− murine models of AMD suggest a protective role for macrophages in AMD pathogenesis—clearance of deposits.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The CX3CR1 SNP is associated with impaired microglial chemotaxis (Combadiere et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.2. Microglia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Combadiere et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Indeed, histological analysis of AMD retinas has depicted the presence of many activated microglia in the macular lesions (Gupta et al., 2003).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.2. Microglia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gupta et al., 2003 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As expected, impaired macrophage recruitment in Ccl2 and Ccr2 deficient mice was associated with an accumulation of C5, IgG, and other drusen constituents within the retina.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The pathological features of this model include CNV.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Ambati and colleagues demonstrated that the Ccl2- and Ccr2 knockout mice (Ccl2−/− and Ccr2−/−) exhibit AMD-like drusen visible fundoscopically by 9 months of age.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ambati et al., 2003 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On the other hand, Apte and colleagues, using a model of interleukin-10 (IL-10) deficient mice, found that macrophages play a protective role in CNV (Apte et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.1. Macrophages
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Apte et al., 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, murine retinal degenerative diseases can still provide relevant information that will help our understanding of human AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.1. Introduction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Tsutsumi et al. demonstrating that decreased macrophage influx after laser injury to Ccl2−/− mice is associated with reduced laser-induced CNV (Tsutsumi et al., 2003).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tsutsumi et al., 2003 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These accrued microglia might cause direct damage to the photoreceptors.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.2. Microglia
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“as mentioned above, in vitro studies have demonstrated that activated microglia are capable of directly injuring photoreceptor cells (Roque et al., 1999).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roque et al., 1999 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these studies suggest a potential role for microglia accumulation in the inflammatory cascade associated with AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“CX3CR1 positive cells in drusen and near CNV membranes are microglial cells in human AMD eyes (Combadiere et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Combadiere et al., 2007 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They also strengthen the argument for a critical inflammatory component to AMD pathogenesis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At age 2 years, cfh−/− mice exhibited significantly reduced visual acuity and rod response amplitudes on electroretinography as compared with age-matched control mice (Coffey et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.3. Cfh−/− murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coffey et al., 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This model is in fact an improvement upon the prior ApoE-Leiden plus high fat diet model, which demonstrated only basal laminar deposits in Bruch’s membrane.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast, both ApoE2 and ApoE4 transgenic mice developed extensive retinal, RPE, and choroidal degeneration after a high fat cholesterol rich (HF-CR) diet.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Malek et al., 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“recent studies in an abcr (abca4) knockout mouse (Abcr−/−) highlight potential mechanisms underlying maculopathy in patients with putative risk-conferring ABCA4 polymorphisms and perhaps even AMD in general.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.5. Abcr−/− murine model
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The findings from this study are somewhat contrary to several prior epidemiological studies that demonstrated a protective, rather than risk-conferring, role for the ApoE4 variant.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed above, polymorphisms in the ABCA4 gene might contribute to AMD pathogenesis”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.5. Abcr−/− murine model
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to photoreceptor degeneration and lipofuscin accumulation, this model also demonstrates decreased recovery of rod cell sensitivity after light exposure (Midena et al., 1997; Weng et al., 1999).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.5. Abcr−/− murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Midena et al., 1997
- Not checked yetcites Weng et al., 1999 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This effect was even more pronounced in ApoE2 transgenic mice fed with a high fat diet.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2007
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They found that diet withstanding, ApoE status alone affected retinal changes during aging only minimally.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Malek et al., 2005 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The role of cholesterol metabolism in AMD has been further supported by recent studies demonstrating that, in contrast to wild-type eyes, mice expressing ApoE2 exhibited signs of lipid accumulation in the RPE and Bruch’s membrane (Lee et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2007
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The retina in general, and macula in particular are highly susceptible to oxidative stress given the elevated oxygen tension, high metabolic activity, exposure to photoradiation, presence of photosensitizers, and oxidizing processes of photoreceptor phagocytosis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent findings demonstrating a genetic link between the complement system members including C1, C2, C3, C7, BF, and especially, CFH provide a compelling argument for complement over-activation in AMD pathogenesis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The association of ApoE alleles with AMD, as well as recent ApoE-based animal models of AMD, suggest a potential role for aberrant cholesterol and lipid trafficking and metabolism in AMD pathogenesis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, AMD appears to be a highly multifactorial disease likely caused by individual-specific combinations of etiological and risk factors that affect not only the disease itself but also its response to various treatment modalities.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 7. Future direction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, in a recent study on the expression of 23,720 transcripts from trials on blood samples (n = 1002) or adipose tissue (n = 673), findings from over 50% of trials in adipose samples correlated to those from clinical trials related to obesity, compared to less than 10% in trials on blood samples (Emilsson et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 7. Future direction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Emilsson et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelationaln = 673- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared to the scenario with complement, the precise role of macrophages and microglia in AMD pathogenesis—i.e. deciphering whether they are protective, harmful, or both—is less clear.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent studies on the molecular pathology of AMD suggest important roles for oxidative stress, inflammation, lipid metabolism, and angiogenesis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, AMD patients with risk-conferring CFH SNP showed less response to antioxidant and zinc therapy as compared to those without the SNP (Klein et al., 2008a).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 7. Future direction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein et al., 2008a
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 58
- Probably not a substantial claim. 17
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Funduscopic examination and vasculature, however, appears normal in the cfh−/− mice.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.3. Cfh−/− murine model
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Coffey et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page not available) report no vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography in either group, supporting a limited claim about the vasculature. The paper says fundus photographs were taken but does not report a normal funduscopic examination; its retinal imaging instead found significantly more autofluorescent foci in cfh−/− mice. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“We have reported that the V249I (valine to isoleucine at amino acid 249) and T280M (threonine to methionine at amino acid 280) CX3CR1 SNPs confer increased risk of AMD (Tuo et al., 2004). The OR (CI) of these two SNPs were 1.86 (1.04–3.31) for V249I and 1.94 (1.02–3.69) for T280M.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tuo et al., 2004 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By examining four cohort studies, we have also confirmed this association with ORs of 2.17 and 2.97 for dry and wet AMD, respectively (Tuo et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tuo et al., 2008 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Macrophage and microglial accumulation was also increased relative to wild-type in Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− mice, as well as in Cx3cr1−/− mice, though to a lesser degree (Ross et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We found that Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− mice exhibited, at an early age of 4–6 weeks, fundoscopically visible drusen-like lesions, as well as histological signs of AMD such as thickening of Bruch’s membrane, drusen, local RPE hypopigmentation and degeneration, and photoreceptor disorganization and atrophy, as well as CNV in some mice.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AMD pathology is characterized by degeneration involving the retinal photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium, and Bruch’s membrane, as well as, in some cases, alterations in choroidal capillaries.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“analyses have revealed protective effects from antioxidants, nuts, fish, and omega-3 polysaccharide unsaturated fatty acids (AREDS, 2001; Cho et al., 2001; Seddon et al., 1994, 2001; Smith et al., 2000).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both fat intake and obesity have been linked to increased risk of AMD (Mares-Perlman et al., 1995; Seddon et al., 2003)”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Early AMD is characterized by thickening and loss of normal architecture within Bruch’s membrane, lipofuscin accumulation in the RPE, and drusen formation beneath the RPE in Bruch’s membrane”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent study of age-related changes demonstrates recruitment of leukocytes and activation of the complement cascade in mouse RPE and choroid (Chen et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2008 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recurrence risks in relatives indicate increased relative risks in siblings (2.95), first cousins (1.29), second cousins (1.13), and parents (5.66) of affected cases (Luo et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 1. Introduction > 1.2. Risk factors for AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Luo et al., 2008 source
hedgedcorrelationaln = 4,764- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The larger the drusen, the greater the area they cover, and the larger the areas of hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation of the RPE in the macula, the higher the risk of late age-related macular degeneration is (Klein et al., 2002).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein et al., 2002 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aging is associated with changes in the retina, including alterations in RPE cellular size and shape, thickening of Bruch’s membrane, thickening of the internal limiting membrane, and a decrease in retinal neuronal elements (Green, 1996).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Green, 1996
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“BlinL consist of vesicular material located in the inner collagenous zone of Bruch’s membrane and represent a specific marker for AMD (Curcio and Millican, 1999).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Curcio and Millican, 1999
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“recent studies have generated significant interest in the inflammatory underpinnings of AMD pathogenesis (Klein et al., 2008b).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein et al., 2008b
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These SNPs lie in genes encoding complement factors, chemokines and chemokine receptors, and toll-like receptors.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Loss of RPE cells responsible for servicing the overlying photoreceptors leads to the gradual degeneration of nearby photoreceptors, resulting in thinning of the retina (Fig. 2) and a progressive visual impairment.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“RAP refers to new vessel development extending outward into the subretinal space from the neurosensory retina, sometimes anastomosing with the choroid-derived vessels (Lafaut et al., 2000).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lafaut et al., 2000 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Classical neovascular AMD is mainly illustrated with CNV and subretinal neovascular fibrous tissue (Fig. 3).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the defining characteristic of late stage ‘wet’ or neovascular AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.2. Late stage AMD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it has long been recognized that drusen are the hallmark lesions of AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 2. Pathology of AMD > 2.1. Early stage AMD
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“CFH inhibits the alternative pathway by promoting Factor I-mediated inactivation of C3b or by displacing Factor Bb from the C3bBb complex (Alsenz et al., 1985).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Alsenz et al., 1985 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yu et al. also show no significant difference in their protein secretion, cofactor activity, or interaction with heparan, but a significant difference in binding to CRP (Yu et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yu et al., 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CFH is encoded within the interval of chromosome 1q23–32, a region associated with AMD previously through linkage studies (Klein et al., 1998).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein et al., 1998 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“AMD patients have been found to possess increased serum anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies, and these antibodies have been linked to increased risk of AMD progression (Robman et al., 2005).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Robman et al., 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a recent publication indicates that CFH binds to the denatured rather than native CRP, thus casting some doubt upon this link between CFH and CRP (Hakobyan et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hakobyan et al., 2008 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the L9H BF/E318D C2 and R32Q BF/intronic variants of C2 have been shown to be protective for AMD (odds ratio (OR) = 0.45 and 0.36, respectively) by Gold et al.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gold et al., 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the current data suggest a central role for innate immunity and inflammation in general and complement overactivation in particular for AMD pathogenesis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In individuals homozygous for the non-risk phenotype (Y402Y/Y402Y), 34% of those treated with placebo progressed to advanced AMD, compared with 11% of those treated with antioxidants plus zinc, a reduction of approximately 68%. In contrast, in individuals homozygous for the risk-conferring phenotype (Y402H/Y402H), 44% of those treated with placebo group progressed to advanced AMD, compared with 39”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klein et al., 2008a
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Variation near the FI gene on chromosome 4q25 is associated with risk of advanced AMD, although no obvious functional variation has been discovered (Fagerness et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fagerness et al., 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“C3F has in fact been associated with several diseases, including membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (Montes et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Montes et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The interleukin-8 (IL8) A251T genetic polymorphism located in chromosome 4q13–21 is reported to be associated with AMD, with the homozygous AA genotype (A allele) as the “at risk” factor (Goverdhan et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goverdhan et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“whose immunohistochemical analysis in humans showed that CX3CR1 was expressed on all retinal microglial cells, and these cells are the only cells in the retina that express CX3CR1.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Combadiere et al., 2007 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study by Zareparsi et al reported that the D299G (aspartate to glycine at amino acid 299) TLR4 (encoded in chromosome 9q32–33) polymorphism leads to increased AMD risk (OR = 2.65) (Zareparsi et al., 2005).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zareparsi et al., 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This finding of an AMD susceptibility locus on chromosome 10q26 has been replicated by other genome-wide linkage studies (Weeks et al., 2004) and supported by a genome-scan meta-analysis (Fisher et al., 2005).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Functionally, the D299G TLR4 variant has been linked to impaired LPS responsiveness in mice, which is reversible by TLR4 overexpression (Arbour et al., 2000).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Arbour et al., 2000 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, the relationships of these SNPs with AMD are still preliminary or controversial to date and require additional studies in diverse and larger populations.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.3. Chemokines and chemokine receptors
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies have shown that rs11200638 in the promoter region is the most well-documented, statistically significant AMD-associated SNP with a high OR of 1.60–2.61 and 6.56–10.0 in heterozygous and homozygous individuals (Caucasians, Chinese and Japanese), respectively (Cameron et al., 2007; Deangelis et al., 2008; Dewan et al., 2006; Mori et al., 2007; Tam et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, studies have shown that human donor AMD eyes contain higher levels of protein adducts resulting from the oxidative modification of carbohydrates and lipids (Crabb et al., 2002; Howes et al., 2004) and higher levels of antioxidant enzymes (Decanini et al., 2007; Frank et al., 1999) compared with non-AMD eyes, which indicate that oxidative stress plays an important role in AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several lines of evidence indicate that mitochondria play a central role in aging and in the pathogenesis of AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fritsche et al. also showed that ARMS2 protein in the human retina localizes to the photoreceptor layer and that it demonstrates a minor dot-like staining in the ellipsoid region of the rod and cone inner segments, which fully co-localizes with a mitochondrial marker, anti-MTCO2, suggesting that ARMS2 is expressed in the mitochondria (Fritsche et al., 2008).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fritsche et al., 2008 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most importantly, since the A69S and InDel are in 100% LD and on the same haplotype, the effects are not independent to each other.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“VEGF plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD, and recently, therapies targeting VEGF have shown promising results of significant improvement of central vision and reduction of CNV (Wylegala and Teper, 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.6. VEGF
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wylegala and Teper, 2007
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently Kanda et al. reported that ARMS2 (T allele at rs10490924, A69S), rather than HtrA1, to be truly associated with AMD (Kanda et al., 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.4. LOC387715/ARMS2 and HtrA1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kanda et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is well established that the formation of blood vessels occurs by angiogenesis and that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key molecule in promoting angiogenesis (Ferrara et al., 2003).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.6. VEGF
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ferrara et al., 2003 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“One study has demonstrated that the ERCC6 C6530G SNP is modestly associated with AMD susceptibility, its interaction with a SNP (rs380390) in the CFH intron is highly associated with AMD (Tuo et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.7. ERCC6
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tuo et al., 2006 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These conflicting data could result from differences of the ethnicities studied, study designs, and statistical analyses.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.6. VEGF
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the RPE cell is one of many systems that downregulate the immune response in the eye, and thus the pathway between RPE damage and ocular inflammation is likely a two way street whereby RPE damage potentiates inflammation, which further worsens RPE degeneration.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Neovascular AMD was found to be associated with the rs2010963 (G634C) VEGF-A SNP in a case-control cohort, and in a family cohort with two intronic VEGF-A SNPs (rs833070 and rs3025030) (Haines et al., 2006).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.6. VEGF
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Haines et al., 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main drawback of using mice to study AMD is that the mouse retina has no macula.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, Cx3cr1−/− mice exhibited increased microglial accumulation after laser-injury, as well as worsened laser-induced CNV and retinal degeneration.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Combadiere et al., 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cx3cr1−/− mice demonstrated retinal degeneration and drusen-like deposits, which contained bloated accumulated microglia capable of phagocytosing outer segments of photoreceptor cells in 18 months and older mice.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Combadiere et al., 2007 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Microglia are the resident immune cells in the retina required for neuronal homeostasis and innate immune defense (Langmann, 2007).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 4. Involvement of inflammatory cells > 4.2. Microglia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Langmann, 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Animal models based upon Ccl2 and Cx3cr1 knockout have lent strength to this hypothesis and provided some insights into the potential inflammatory mechanisms underlying AMD pathogenesis.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with findings in drusen of humans with AMD (Hageman et al., 2005), as well as the critical role in AMD of complement overactivity, which has been discussed above.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hageman et al., 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed above, CFH polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to AMD in more than half of affected individuals.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.3. Cfh−/− murine model
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings highlight that the Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− murine model of AMD is a robust one with several immunological features also documented in human AMD and supported by studies in other in vivo models of AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.2. Chemokine model
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, CNV in aged ApoE4 mice on the HF-CR diet contained amyloid β deposits, as well as VEGF and other factors also seen in human AMD and CNV.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Malek et al., 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These mice also demonstrated increased autofluorescence, accumulation of C3, and disorganization of photoreceptor outer segments in the retina, as well as thinning of Bruch’s membrane and increased RPE organelles.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.3. Cfh−/− murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coffey et al., 2007 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed above, prior studies have suggested a probable association between ApoE polymorphisms and AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Aged ApoE4 mice on this diet exhibited several features of human AMD, including drusen, thickening of Bruch’s membrane, geographic RPE atrophy, and CNV.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Malek et al., 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, the eyes of ApoE2 transgenic mice also expressed higher levels of the proangiogenic factor VEGF but lower levels of anti-angiogenic factor pigment epithelium derived factor (PEDF).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2007
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Abcr−/− mice demonstrate decreased dark adaptation, increased all-trans-retinaldehyde after light exposure, increased phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in outer segments, accumulation of N-retinylidene-phosphatidylethanolamine, the conjugate of all-trans retinaldehyde and PE in photoreceptors, and deposition of A2E fluorophore, a major component of lipofuscin, in the RPE (Weng et al., 1999).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.5. Abcr−/− murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Weng et al., 1999 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most importantly, the ApoE-based murine model of AMD highlights the potential role for cholesterol metabolism in AMD pathogenesis and further emphasized the need to clarify the role of ApoE variants in human AMD.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.4. ApoE-based murine model
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While several risk factors, including age, race, smoking, and diet have been linked to AMD, the etiology and pathogenesis of the disease remain largely unclear.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though AMD research has made great advances in recent years, our understanding of its pathogenesis remains largely incomplete.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 7. Future direction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CFH polymorphisms have been linked to a pro-inflammatory state, including increased CRP and decreased complement inhibitory effect.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“VEGF is a key angiogenic factor in the development of CNV in late stage AMD, and recent studies suggest that polymorphisms in the VEGF gene might contribute to risk of AMD and to efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The role of oxidative stress is further strengthened by epidemiological studies demonstrating increased risk with smoking, a potent oxidizing stress, and decreased risk with diets rich in antioxidants such as lutein/zeaxanthin.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Treatment options for the condition are similarly limited.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pathology of AMD lesions classically demonstrates signs of persistent chronic inflammatory damage, including not only mild infiltration of macrophages and accumulation of microglia, but also presence of inflammatory components such as complement factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines in the drusen and AMD lesions.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AMD is a debilitating disease of the retina, which manifests clinically with loss of central vision and pathologically with the accumulation of drusen, RPE degeneration, photoreceptor atrophy, and in some cases, with CNV.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 6. Summary
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ultrastructural analysis revealed abnormal basal RPE with small irregular dense bodies in both abcr−/− and abcr+/− mice, but no drusen formation (Mata et al., 2001).”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 5. Animal models of AMD > 5.5. Abcr−/− murine model
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mata et al., 2001
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Innovation in AMD pharmacotherapy depends largely on a thorough understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying AMD pathogenesis.
“Innovation in AMD pharmacotherapy, in turn, depends largely upon a thorough understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying AMD pathogenesis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AMD is a multifactorial disease that primarily affects photoreceptors and RPE cells.
“AMD is a multifactorial disease that affects primarily the photoreceptors and RPE cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mouse retina has no macula.
“The main drawback of using mice to study AMD is that the mouse retina has no macula.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Laser-induced CNV and CNV associated with age-related degenerative retinal changes arise through different mechanisms.
“These studies might be reconciled by the argument that laser-induced CNV, an acute injury, occurs by a different mechanism than CNV associated with age-related degenerative changes in the retina.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many critical biological processes are context specific.
“Given the context specificity of many critical biological processes and the fact that most common diseases including AMD are thought to be the outcome of a complex interaction between many genetic loci and the environment, it follows that there are obvious advantages to studying gene expression in cells and tissues that represent the in vivo state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Common diseases including AMD result from complex interactions between many genetic loci and the environment.
“Given the context specificity of many critical biological processes and the fact that most common diseases including AMD are thought to be the outcome of a complex interaction between many genetic loci and the environment, it follows that there are obvious advantages to studying gene expression in cells and tissues that represent the in vivo state.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although other susceptibility genes have been reported, these four SNPs have consistently been shown to have the strongest associations with the development and progression of AMD and have been postulated to influence response to therapy.2,3,12”
From Pharmacogenetics for Genes Associated with Age-related Macular Degeneration in the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT) (2013) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Pioneering developments in AMD genetics research have identified numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in multiple genes associated with the prevalence of the early and/or late stages of AMD.2,3”
From Pharmacogenetics for Genes Associated with Age-related Macular Degeneration in the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT) (2013) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It has been hypothesized that overexpression of HTRA1 may alter the integrity of Bruch’s membrane and favor the development of CNV.2”
From Pharmacogenetics for Genes Associated with Age-related Macular Degeneration in the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT) (2013) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Loss of mitochondria is also reported in AMD retina (Ding et. al, 2009).”
From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Ding et. al, 2009
In the citing paper
“AMD still has an unknown etiology, though oxidative stress to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells along with immune dysregulation are leading theories of AMD pathogenesis (Ding et al., 2009).”
From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“There is an age-related increase in thickness in Bruch’s membrane and the internal limiting membrane (Sarks, 1976; Ding et al., 2009).”
From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“The Ccl2−/−/Cx3cr1−/− mouse model demonstrates many AMD features: small drusenoid deposits, RPE and Bruch’s membrane degenerations, photoreceptor atrophy, CNV, and simulation of the immunologic and pathologic environments found in AMD patients (Herzlich et al., 2008; Ross et al., 2008; Ding et al., 2009).”
From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“The molecular pathology of dry AMD has demonstrated a role of oxidative stress, inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation”
From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Ding et al. 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular pathology of AMD > 3.2. Complement system
“Brantley et al. investigated 86 wet AMD patients to determine whether there is an association between CFH genotypes and response to treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab.”
§ Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration > References
“19. Brantley MA Jr Edelstein SL King JM Plotzke MR Apte RS Kymes SM Shiels A Association of complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with response of exudative age-related macular degeneration to photodynamic therapy Eye 2008”
Citations
Cites
The biology of VEGF and its receptors
Ferrara, N., Gerber, H.-P., & LeCouter, J. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0603-669 · Cited by 9,591 · cited 2×
“VEGF It is well established that the formation of blood vessels occurs by angiogenesis and that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key molecule in promoting angiogenesis (Ferrara et al., 2003).”
BackgroundThe chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534 · cited 3×
“A dual role for macrophages in AMD—Another plausible explanation for these seemingly contradictory findings is that macrophages comprise a heterogeneous group with a spectrum of phenotypes and activities (Mantovani et al., 2004).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRanibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Rosenfeld, P. J., Brown, D. M., Heier, J. S., Boyer, D. S., Kaiser, P. K., Chung, C. Y., & Kim, R. Y. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa054481 · Cited by 5,886
Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration
Klein, R. J., Zeiss, C., Chew, E. Y., Tsai, J.-Y., Sackler, R. S., Haynes, C., Henning, A. K., SanGiovanni, J. P., Mane, S. M., Mayne, S. T., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109557 · Cited by 4,492
Walport, M. J. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200104053441406 · Cited by 2,969 · cited 1×
“…of the complement system generates a variety of pro-inflammatory responses, including the production of membrane-attack complexes (MAC) which lead to cell lysis, release of chemokines to mediate recruitment of inflammatory cells, and enhancement of capillary permeability (Walport, 2001a, b).”
BackgroundPrevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States
The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group* (2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.564 · Cited by 2,783 · cited 2×
“Currently, in the United States alone, 1.75 million people are affected by AMD and 7 million people are at risk of developing AMD (Friedman et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialComplement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration
Edwards, A. O., Ritter, R., Abel, K. J., Manning, A., Panhuysen, C., & Farrer, L. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110189 · Cited by 2,449 · cited 4×
“These SNPs have been reported to be major genetic factors for developing AMD in Caucasians (Edwards et al., 2005; Hageman et al., 2005; Haines et al., 2005; Klein et al., 2005; Tuo et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialComplement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration
Haines, J. L., Hauser, M. A., Schmidt, S., Scott, W. K., Olson, L. M., Gallins, P., Spencer, K. L., Kwan, S. Y., Noureddine, M., Gilbert, J. R., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110359 · Cited by 2,424 · cited 4×
“These SNPs have been reported to be major genetic factors for developing AMD in Caucasians (Edwards et al., 2005; Hageman et al., 2005; Haines et al., 2005; Klein et al., 2005; Tuo et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialPegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Gragoudas, E. S., Adamis, A. P., Cunningham, E. T., Feinsod, M., & Guyer, D. R. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042760 · Cited by 2,337 · cited 1×
“…Inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularization, Clinical Trial and Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (MARINA) (AREDS, 2001; Bressler et al., 2003; Gragoudas et al., 2004; Rosenfeld et al., 2006).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- de Jong, 2007, Polymorphisms in the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene and Risk of Aging Macula Disorder: The Rotterdam Study, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 48
- Green, 1996, Retina: growth and aging, Vol. 2, 676
- Hutchison, 1875, Symmetrical central choroidoretinal disease occurring in senile persons, R. Lond. Ophthal. Hosp. Rep, 8, 231
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Age-related macular degeneration
Lim, L. S., Mitchell, P., Seddon, J. M., Holz, F. G., & Wong, T. Y. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60282-7 · Cited by 1,806
The dynamic nature of Bruch's membrane
Booij, J. C., Baas, D. C., Beisekeeva, J., Gorgels, T. G. M. F., & Bergen, A. A. B. (2010) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.08.003 · Cited by 581
“Bruch’s membrane and AMD pathology Oxidative stress in the RPE and its effects on BM Multiple studies in man, AMD animal models and (RPE) cell lines point toward an important role of oxidative stress in the development of AMD[119].”
InfluentialBernstein, P. S., Li, B., Vachali, P. P., Gorusupudi, A., Shyam, R., Henriksen, B. S., & Nolan, J. M. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.10.003 · Cited by 570
“chromosome 10, along withmyriad other minor genetic risk factors identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (Ding et al., 2009; Kanda et al., 2007; Klein et al., 2005; Montezuma et al., 2007; Neale et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2006).”
Consequences of oxidative stress in age-related macular degeneration
Jarrett, S. G., & Boulton, M. E. (2012) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.03.009 · Cited by 549
“…being identified which increase susceptibility to environmental risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, diet, oxidative stress (reviewed in Ding et al. (2009), Khandhadia and Lotery (2010), Montezuma et al. (2007), Swaroop et al. (2009), Ting et al. (2009)) and see review by Gorin in this…”
BackgroundLight-emitting diodes (LED) for domestic lighting: Any risks for the eye?
Béhar‐Cohen, F., Martinsons, C., Viénot, F., Zissis, G., Barlier-Salsi, A., Césarini, J. P., Enouf, O., Garcia, M., Picaud, S. A., & Attia, D. (2011) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.04.002 · Cited by 417
“Compared with age-matched controls, patients with advanced age-relatedmacular degeneration (geographic atrophy or disciform scarring) had significantly higher exposure to blue or visible light over the preceding 20 years but were not different in respect to exposure to UV-A or UV-B, suggesting that blue-light exposure…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, X., Patel, M., & Chan, C.-C.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Chi-Chao
- Venue
- Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2715284
- OpenAlex
- W2084944408
- Semantic Scholar
- f9eb706832ee615a7771dad2f6ed351095c05219
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 224
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (Z01EY000222, Z01EY000418)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- age-related macular degeneration, molecular pathology, genetic susceptibility, complement factor H, CX3CR1, inflammation, apoptosis, cholesterol transport, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, retinal pigment epithelium, Bruch's membrane, choroidal capillaries, photoreceptor degeneration, animal models
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Retina, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review