Cited by 269Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal and Macular Surgery

Early drusen formation in the normal and aging eye and their relation to age related maculopathy: a clinicopathological study

Open access
Sarks, S H, Arnold, J J, Killingsworth, M C, Sarks, J P·1999·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

AIM: To describe the early formation of drusen and their relation to normal aging changes at the macula and to the development of age related maculopathy (ARM). METHOD: Histopathological features of 353 eyes without histological evidence of ARM are described and correlated with the clinical appearance. In addition, 45 of these eyes were examined by transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: Drusen were detected histopathologically in 177 (50%) eyes but were seen clinically in only 34% of these. Drusen were mainly small hard drusen with an occasional soft distinct drusen: no soft indistinct drusen were seen. Only those drusen deposits larger than 25-30 microns in diameter were detectable clinically. Preclinical drusen in eyes with only an occasional drusen were seen on electron microscopy as entrapment sites of coated membrane bound bodies which formed adjacent to the inner collagenous zone of Bruch's membrane. In contrast, preclinical drusen deposits in eyes with many drusen were seen as accumulations of amorphous material which appeared hyalinised by light microscopy. A distinct feature were rows of dense hyalinised microdrusen (1-2 microns in diameter), over which larger globular hyalinised drusen formed. CONCLUSION: Histological and ultrastructural examination can recognise and distinguish the earliest drusen formed as a result of normal aging from those associated with ARM. In eyes without diffuse deposits, histologically all drusen were of the hard hyalinised variety or their derivatives; no soft drusen composed of membranous debris were found. These findings support and explain those of other authors who do not consider the presence of a few small hard drusen to be a risk factor for the development of ARM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.83.3.358

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drusen may be visible ophthalmoscopically when their diameter exceeds 25 μm.

    “In the earliest stage, they may be visible ophthalmoscopically, when their diameter exceeds 25 µm (Sarks et al., 1999)”

    From Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration (2009) · cites this paper as Sarks et al., 1999

  • Soft drusen are often large and are associated with the detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium and diffusely abnormal Bruch's membrane alterations.

    “Soft drusen are often large and are associated with the detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium and diffusely abnormal Bruch’s membrane alterations.122,124”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [122]

  • Macrophages have been detected in regressing drusen, suggesting that macrophages are recruited to eliminate the age-accumulated deposits within Bruch's membrane.

    “Macrophages have been detected in regressing drusen,122 suggesting that macrophages are recruited to eliminate the age-accumulated deposits within Bruch’s membrane (figure 5).”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Curcio CA, Millican CI. Basal deposits in Bruch's membrane: distribution in aging and age-related macu- lopathy (ARM). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;39:S882.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarks, S. H., Arnold, J. J., Killingsworth, M. C., & Sarks, J. P.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Sarks, S H
  • Sarks, J P
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
358-368
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127507482
Cited by
269
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
drusen, age-related maculopathy, Bruch's membrane, macula
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Basement Membrane, Capillaries, Choroid, Female, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Middle Aged, Retinal Drusen, Bruch Membrane

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review