The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Commodity thermoplastics and thermoplastic composites are staples in Additive Manufacturing (AM). Their use is widespread and accounts for the largest volume of 3D printed materials. Accessible property ranges of current material formulations are limited, and thus there is high interest in extending AM to high-performance engineering polymers and nanocomposites that have yet to gain wide commercial acceptance in AM. Current applications of high-performance thermoplastic polymers are limited to adaptations from conventional plastics processing such as injection molding, thermoforming, extrusion, and others. Thermoplastic composites can be categorized into particle-, fiber-, and nanomaterial-based composites as well as polymer blends. The importance of these different composite systems to AM is discussed in this review. Also reviewed are trends in instrument development such as in-nozzle impregnation, dual print heads, and higher temperature FDM that improve printing of thermoplastic composites. An overview of newer types of AM techniques allowing higher filler loading for thermoplastic composites like liquid deposition modeling (LDM) sometimes known as direct ink writing (DIW) are discussed. Finally, a perspective is given on the important parameters and standards needed to make AM printed objects from polymer composites more effective in cost/performance ratio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 · Cited by 3,325
Ning, F., Cong, W., Qiu, J., Wei, J., & Wang, S. (2015) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 · Cited by 1,718
Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing
Tekinalp, H. L., Kunc, V., Velez-Garcia, G. M., Duty, C. E., Love, L. J., Naskar, A. K., Blue, C. A., & Ozcan, S. (2014) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 · Cited by 1,514
Binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting
Kruth, J., Mercelis, P., Van Vaerenbergh, J., Froyen, L., & Rombouts, M. (2005) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540510573365 · Cited by 1,383
Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers
Dizon, J. R. C., Espera, A. H., Chen, Q., & Advincula, R. C. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 · Cited by 1,340
Self-citationThree-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation
Matsuzaki, R., Ueda, M., Namiki, M., Jeong, T.-K., Asahara, H., Horiguchi, K., Nakamura, T., Todoroki, A., & Hirano, Y. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep23058 · Cited by 1,171
Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites
Tian, X., Liu, T., Yang, C., Wang, Q., & Li, D. (2016) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 · Cited by 1,162
Highly compressible 3D periodic graphene aerogel microlattices
Zhu, C., Han, T. Y.-J., Duoss, E. B., Golobic, A. M., Kuntz, J. D., Spadaccini, C. M., & Worsley, M. A. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7962 · Cited by 1,148
Three-Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model
Sachs, E., Cima, M., & Cornie, J. (1990) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61035-x · Cited by 871
Dickson, A. N., Barry, J. N., McDonnell, K. A., & Dowling, D. P. (2017) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004 · Cited by 792
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
Rajan, K., Samykano, M., Kadirgama, K., Harun, W. S. W., & Rahman, M. M. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 · Cited by 426
3D‐Printed Anisotropic Polymer Materials for Functional Applications
Chen, J., Liu, X., Tian, Y., Zhu, W., Yan, C., Shi, Y., Kong, L. B., Qi, H. J., & Zhou, K. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202102877 · Cited by 281
Additive manufacturing of polymeric composites from material processing to structural design
Yuan, S., Li, S., Zhu, J., & Tang, Y. (2021) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108903 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Valino, A. D., Dizon, J. R. C., Espera, A. H., Chen, Q., Messman, J., & Advincula, R. C.
- Venue
- Progress in Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 101162
- ISSN
- 0079-6700 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2974825919
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 26.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162
- The paper
- Valino, A. D., Dizon, J. R. C., Espera, A. H., Chen, Q., Messman, J., & Advincula, R. C. (2019). Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Progress in Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
