Cited by 105Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration

Absence of hippocampal volume differences in survivors of the Nazi Holocaust with and without posttraumatic stress disorder

Golier, Julia A., Yehuda, Rachel, De Santi, Susan, Segal, Salomoa, Dolan, Susan, de Leon, Mony J.·2005·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

It remains unclear whether smaller hippocampal volume is a consistent feature of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and whether it accounts for the associated memory deficits observed in this illness. Hippocampal volume, comparison regions and memory performance were examined in Holocaust survivors with PTSD (PTSD+: n=14; 5 men, 9 women) and without PTSD (PTSD-: n=13; 6 men, 7 women) and a non-exposed control group of healthy Jewish adults (n=20; 13 men, 7 women). The subjects had medical examinations, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, and memory testing. PTSD+ subjects had poorer memory performance than non-exposed subjects and PTSD- subjects, but they did not differ from either group in right or left hippocampal volume when gender and head size were taken into account. Older age and smaller left hippocampal volume were more strongly associated in the PTSD+ group than in the PTSD- groups. Holocaust survivors had larger superior temporal gyral and lateral temporal lobe volumes bilaterally than non-exposed subjects. Smaller hippocampal volume is not invariably associated with chronic PTSD and does not explain the substantial explicit memory impairment observed in Holocaust survivors with this disorder. Larger temporal lobe volumes may be associated with early traumatization and survival or may reflect some other characteristic of Holocaust survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2005.02.007

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golier, J. A., Yehuda, R., De Santi, S., Segal, S., Dolan, S., & de Leon, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Golier, Julia A.
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
53-64
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058297450
Cited by
105
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh049555-07)
  • School of Medicine, New York University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 49555)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, Holocaust survivors, hippocampal volume, temporal lobe volume, superior temporal gyrus, early trauma, brain structure, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Temporal Lobe, Survivors, Holocaust, National Socialism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review