Cited by 192Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a putative add-on treatment for major depression in elderly patients

Open access
Mosimann, Urs P., Schmitt, Wolfgang, Greenberg, Benjamin D., Kosel, Markus, Müri, René M., Berkhoff, Magdalena, Hess, Christian W., Fisch, Hans U. +1 more·2004·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a recent putative treatment for affective disorders. Several studies have demonstrated antidepressant effects of rTMS in younger patients; we aimed to assess its effect in older outpatients with treatment-resistant major depression. Twenty-four outpatients (mean age=62 years, S.D.=12) with major depression were randomized for sham or real stimulation and received 10 daily rTMS sessions (20 Hz, 2-s trains, 28-s intertrain intervals, 100% of motor threshold) in addition to the antidepressant medication. For sham stimulation, the coil was tilted 90 degrees. Depression severity was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, items from the NIMH self-rated symptom scale, and a visual analog depression scale. Mini-Mental Status Examination performance, memory, and executive and attentional functions were measured to control for cognitive side effects. Depression ratings revealed significant antidepressant effects within 2 weeks in both sham and real stimulation groups; however, there were no between-group differences. Treatment with rTMS was safe; adverse events were rare and not more prevalent in either group, and cognitive assessment did not show any deterioration. We were unable to demonstrate any additional antidepressant effects of real stimulation in elderly patients with treatment-resistant major depression. Therapeutic effects of rTMS in this clinically challenging patient group r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2003.10.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mosimann, U. P., Schmitt, W., Greenberg, B. D., Kosel, M., Müri, R. M., Berkhoff, M., Hess, C. W., Fisch, H. U., & Schlaepfer, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Schlaepfer, Thomas E.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
123-133
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137061709
Cited by
192
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, major depressive disorder, elderly patients, treatment-resistant depression, adjunctive therapy, antidepressant effects, sham stimulation, cognitive side effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Cognition Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Periodicity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Skull, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review