Are self-reports valid for schizophrenia patients with poor insight? Relationship of unawareness of illness to psychological self-report instruments
Abstract
This investigation aimed to determine whether impaired insight influences the validity of self-report test scores in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. 274 outpatients enrolled in work rehabilitation completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory (BORRTI), and NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Self-report scores were compared to clinician's ratings on comparable personality and symptom dimensions on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Work Behavior Inventory (WBI), and the Quality of Life Scale (QLS). The influence of insight was determined using the Scale for Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD). In the first analysis, clinician SUMD ratings of patient insight were associated with self-report accuracy. In a second analysis, patients were categorized into good and poor insight groups based on SUMD ratings and compared on self-report and clinician report variables. Results suggest that poor insight patients accurately report less Neuroticism and Agreeableness, and more Psychoticism than good insight patients, but individuals with poor insight wish to present themselves as more extraverted than they actually are, and they are likely to be more certain of their perceptions than they should be. It appears that self-report measures may be valid for most personality and symptom domains.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The validity of the findings is limited by the employment of self-reported evaluations.
“The validity of our findings is further limited by the employment of self-reported evaluations.67”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Belvederi Murri, M., Respino, M., Innamorati, M., Cervetti, A., Calcagno, P., Pompili, M., Lamis, D. A., Ghio, L., & Amore, M. (2015) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.003 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Wellness within illness: Happiness in schizophrenia
Palmer, B. W., Martin, A. S., Depp, C. A., Glorioso, D. K., & Jeste, D. V. (2014) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.07.027 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Marrero, R. J., Fumero, A., de Miguel, A., & Peñate, W. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.030 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Life story chapters and narrative self-continuity in patients with schizophrenia
Holm, T., Thomsen, D. K., & Bliksted, V. (2016) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.009 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The usefulness of a self-report questionnaire measuring auditory verbal hallucinations
Kim, S. H., Jung, H. Y., Hwang, S. S., Chang, J. S., Kim, Y., Ahn, Y. M., & Kim, Y. S. (2010) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.005 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Rønne, S. T., Zabell, V., Joensen, L. E., Jørgensen, R., Gæde, P. H., & Hemmingsen Arnfred, S. M. (2020) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.14322 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The relationship between insight and subjective experience in schizophrenia
Kako, Y., Ito, K., Hashimoto, N., Toyoshima, K., Shimizu, Y., Mitsui, N., Fujii, Y., Tanaka, T., & Kusumi, I. (2014) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s66121 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Eklund, M., Lund, K., & Argentzell, E. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1080/11038128.2023.2184717 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hahne, I., Zierhut, M., Bergmann, N., Hahn, E., Ta, T. M. T., Calvano, C., Bajbouj, M., & Böge, K. (2026) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbae198 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bell, M., Fiszdon, J., Richardson, R., Lysaker, P., & Bryson, G.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bell, Morris
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 37-46
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149642558
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, insight, self-report validity, personality assessment, neuroticism, agreeableness, psychoticism, extraversion, Beck Depression Inventory, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, NEO-FFI, PANSS, vocational rehabilitation, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychotic Disorders, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self-Assessment, Self Disclosure, Sick Role, Veterans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review