Cited by 244Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Sensitivity to reward and punishment in eating disorders

Harrison, Amy, O'Brien, Niamh, Lopez, Carolina, Treasure, Janet·2010·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The aim of this review was to collate and summarise the self-report data regarding anomalies in sensitivity to reward and punishment in eating disorders (ED) with use of a meta-analysis where possible. Electronic databases were searched to December 2008. Studies were required to have a non-eating disorder healthy control group and include at least one self-report measure of sensitivity to reward or punishment in an eating disorder population. Findings were very heterogeneous and inconsistencies between studies and measures were highlighted. In general, patients with anorexia nervosa (restricting type) were less sensitive to reward than healthy controls, whereas patients with bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa (binge/purge) type were more sensitive. All ED groups report higher sensitivity to punishment than healthy controls. Individuals with eating disorders differ from healthy controls in measures of reward and punishment sensitivity as measured using the Temperament and Character Inventory, Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire and BIS/BAS scales, but further work is required as there is some heterogeneity in the data. Generating more research using behavioural measures may increase understanding of the findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.06.010

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, A., O'Brien, N., Lopez, C., & Treasure, J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Amy
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
177
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051367276
Cited by
244
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
eating disorders, reward sensitivity, punishment sensitivity, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, self-report measures, Temperament and Character Inventory, Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, BIS/BAS scales, personality traits
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Personality, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Punishment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Self Concept, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review