Cited by 60Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Depression in schizophrenia: the influence of the different dimensions of insight

Misdrahi, David, Denard, Sophie, Swendsen, Joel, Jaussent, Isabelle, Courtet, Philippe·2014·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Improving insight in patients with schizophrenia appears necessary to enhance medication adherence and clinical outcome, but in some patients acquiring insight can paradoxically increase hopelessness, depression and suicidal behavior. The aim of this study is to explore the association of two dimensions of insight (cognitive and clinical) with depression, hopelessness and clinical variables in patients with psychosis. Using a cross-sectional design, 61 remitted outpatients meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders were included. Insight was assessed using the "Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder" (SUMD), the PANSS-item G12 and the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). Overall, 41.2% of the sample had a history of suicide attempts. Patients in the high clinical insight group had significantly higher depression scores, higher hopelessness scores, greater histories of suicide attempts and were more likely to have received psychoeducation. Compared to patients with low cognitive insight, those with high overall cognitive insight were significantly more depressed and had more often received psychoeducation. Greater insight may have negative consequences in terms of depressive symptoms and therefore presents a challenge to clinicians in assessing the individual risks and benefits of strategies intended to enhance awareness of mental disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.039

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Misdrahi, D., Denard, S., Swendsen, J., Jaussent, I., & Courtet, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Misdrahi, David
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
216
Issue
1
Pages
12-16
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036188608
Cited by
60
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
schizophrenia, depression, insight, cognitive insight, clinical insight, hopelessness, suicide attempts, psychosis, psychoeducation, awareness of mental disorder, schizoaffective disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Awareness, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review