CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 599Nutritional Studies and DietFatty Acid Research and HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary patterns and depression risk: A meta-analysis

Li, Ye, Lv, Mei-Rong, Wei, Yan-Jin, Sun, Ling, Zhang, Ji-Xiang, Zhang, Huai-Guo, Li, Bin·2017·Psychiatry Research
DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although some studies have reported potential associations of dietary patterns with depression risk, a consistent perspective hasn't been estimated to date. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the relation between dietary patterns and the risk of depression. A literature research was conducted searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to September 2016. In total, 21 studies from ten countries met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present meta-analysis. A dietary pattern characterized by a high intakes of fruit, vegetables, whole grain, fish, olive oil, low-fat dairy and antioxidants and low intakes of animal foods was apparently associated with a decreased risk of depression. A dietary pattern characterized by a high consumption of red and/or processed meat, refined grains, sweets, high-fat dairy products, butter, potatoes and high-fat gravy, and low intakes of fruits and vegetables is associated with an increased risk of depression. The results of this meta-analysis suggest that healthy pattern may decrease the risk of depression, whereas western-style may increase the risk of depression. However, more randomized controlled trails and cohort studies are urgently required to confirm this findings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.020

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–598 of 598

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y., Lv, M.-R., Wei, Y.-J., Sun, L., Zhang, J.-X., Zhang, H.-G., & Li, B.
Affiliations
Linyi People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Ye
  • Li, Bin
ORCID
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
253
Pages
373-382
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.020
OpenAlex
W2606719128
Cited by
599
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 10
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014HP026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
dietary habits, depression risk, Mediterranean diet, Western diet, fruit and vegetable intake, whole grains, fish consumption, olive oil, red and processed meat, refined grains, milk fat, antioxidants, mental health
MeSH terms
Animals, Depression, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Male, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review