Adherence to safety and self-isolation guidelines, conspiracy and paranoia-like beliefs during COVID-19 pandemic in Poland - associations and moderators
Open accessAbstract
Background Due to coronavirus pandemic, governments have ordered a nationwide isolation. In this situation, we hypothesised that people holding conspiracy beliefs are less willing to adhere to medical guidelines. Furthermore, we explored what possible factors may modify relationships between conspiracy, paranoia-like beliefs, and adherence to epidemiological guidelines. Also, we examined the prevalence of different coronavirus conspiracy beliefs. Methods Two independent internet studies. Study 1 used a proportional quota sample that was representative of the population of Poles in terms of gender and settlement size (n=507). Study 2 employed a convenience sample (n=840). Results Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs are negatively related to safety guidelines. Mixed results suggest that paranoia-like beliefs are related negatively to safety guidelines. Prevalence of firmly held coronavirus conspiracy beliefs is rare. Nevertheless, certain percentage of participants agree with conspiracy beliefs at least partially. Coronavirus related anxiety, trust in media, and internal motivation to isolation moderate the relationship between conspiracy beliefs and adherence to safety guidelines. Paranoia-like beliefs partially mediate between boredom and conspiracy beliefs. Conclusions Conspiracy beliefs concerning coronavirus are present in the population and are negatively related to adherence to safety guidelines. Conspiracy beliefs originate partially from boredom and paranoia proneness. Certain factors - trust in media and internal motivation to isolation - are potentially worthwhile to address to enhance adherence to safety guidelines. Non-probabilistic sampling suggests caution in interpretation of the present findings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
What tended to brew out of the fear, uncertainty and worry was a mistrust of other community members, not knowing who may be infected or not.
“What tended to brew out of the fear, uncertainty and worry was a mistrust of other community members, not knowing who may be infected or not [75,76].”
From Exploring Psychosocial Stressors and Coping Strategies During the COVID‐19 Lockdown: A Study of Two Low‐Income Communities in South Africa (2025) · cites this paper as [76]
The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses COVID-19-related uncertainty, stress and fear of infection, and mentions interpersonal mistrust in connection with paranoia-like beliefs. It does not say that fear and uncertainty produced mistrust of other community members because their infection status was unknown. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic
Pfefferbaum, B., & North, C. S. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2008017 · Cited by 4,378 · see citing works
Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611434786 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612457686 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
COVID-19: Reducing the risk of infection might increase the risk of intimate partner violence
van Gelder, N., Peterman, A., Potts, A., O'Donnell, M., Thompson, K., Shah, N., & Oertelt-Prigione, S. (2020) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100348 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence
Webster, R. K., Brooks, S. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.007 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Belief in conspiracy theories. the role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy
Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Addicted to answers: need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2308 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Coronavirus disease: challenges for psychiatry
Kelly, B. D. (2020) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2020.86 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Brewer N.T. Chapman G.B. Gibbons F.X. Gerrard M. McCaul K.D. Weinstein N.D. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 26 2 2007 136 145 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136 17385964 · DOI · Paper page
- Brooks S.K. Webster R.K. Smith L.E. Woodland L. Wessely S. Greenberg N. Rubin G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence The Lancet 395 10227 2020 912 920 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8 PMC7158942 32112714 · DOI · Paper page
- Brotherton R. Eser S. Bored to fears: Boredom proneness, paranoia, and conspiracy theories Personality and Individual Differences, 80 2015 1 5 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.011 · DOI
- Brotherton R. French C.C. Pickering A.D. Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale Frontiers in Psychology 4 2013 279 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 23734136 PMC3659314 · DOI
- Brown E. Gray R. Lo Monaco S. O'Donoghue B. Nelson B. Thompson A. Francey S. McGorry P. The potential impact of COVID-19 on psychosis: A rapid review of contemporary epidemic and pandemic research Schizophrenia research 2020 10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.005 Advance online publication PMC7200363 32389615 · DOI
- Cava M.A. Fay K.E. Beanlands H.J. McCay E.A. Wignall R. Risk perception and compliance with quarantine during the SARS outbreak Journal of Nursing Ccholarship 37 4 2005 343 347 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00059.x 16396407 · DOI
- Cichocka A. Marchlewska M. Golec de Zavala A. Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories Social Psychological and Personality Science 7 2 2016 157 166 10.1177/1948550615616170 · DOI
- Dobosz P. Zawiła-Niedźwiecki J. Government: Anti-science wave sweeps Poland Nature 532 7600 2016 441 10.1038/532441d 27121832 · DOI
- Fischer M. Coogan A.N. Faltraco F. Thome J. COVID-19 paranoia in a patient suffering from schizophrenic psychosis - a case report Psychiatry Research 288 2020 113001 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113001 PMC7162758 32315884 · DOI
- Freeman D. Suspicious minds: the psychology of persecutory delusions Clinical Psychology Review 27 4 2007 425 457 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.004 17258852 · DOI · Paper page
- Freeman D. Garety P.A. Bebbington P.E. Smith B. Rollinson R. Fowler D. Kuipers E. Ray K. Dunn G. Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186 2005 427 435 10.1192/bjp.186.5.427 15863749 · DOI · Paper page
- Freeman D. Garety P.A. Kuipers E. Fowler D. Bebbington P.E. Dunn G. Acting on persecutory delusions: the importance of safety seeking Behaviour Research and Therapy 45 1 2007 89 99 10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.014 16530161 · DOI
- Freeman D. Gittins M. Pugh K. Antley A. Slater M. Dunn G. What makes one person paranoid and another person anxious? The differential prediction of social anxiety and persecutory ideation in an experimental situation Psychological Medicine 38 8 2008 1121 1132 10.1017/S0033291708003589 18533055 PMC2830058 · DOI
- Freeman D. Loe B. Kingdon D. Startup H. Molodynski A. Rosebrock L. Bird J. The revised Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS): Psychometric properties, severity ranges, and clinical cut-offs Psychological Medicine 2019 1 10 10.1017/S0033291719003155 PMC7893506 31744588 · DOI
- Freeman D. Waite F. Rosebrock L. Petit A. Causier C. East A. Lambe S. Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England Psychological Medicine 2020 1 13 10.1017/S0033291720001890 PMC7264452 32436485 · DOI · Paper page
- Hardt J. The symptom checklist-27-plus (SCL-27-plus): a modern conceptualization of a traditional screening instrument Psycho-Social Medicine 5 2008 Doc08Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736518/?report=classic PMC2736518 19742283
- Humphreys K.L. Myint M.T. Zeanah C.H. Increased Risk for Family Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic Pediatrics 146 1 2020 10.1542/peds.2020-0982 32317306 · DOI
- Jin J. Sklar G.E. Oh V.M.S. Li S.C. Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient's perspective Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 4 1 2008 269 286 10.2147/tcrm.s1458 18728716 PMC2503662 · DOI
- Kenyon C. Flattening-the-curve associated with reduced COVID-19 case fatality rates- an ecological analysis of 65 countries The Journal of Infection 2020 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.007 Advance online publication PMC7162747 32305488 · DOI
- Klemm C. Das E. Hartmann T. Swine flu and hype: a systematic review of media dramatization of the H1N1 influenza pandemic Journal of Risk Research 19 1 2016 1 20 10.1080/13669877.2014.923029 · DOI
- Kossowska M. Bukowski M. Motivated roots of conspiracies: The role of certainty and control motives in conspiracy thinking Bilewicz M. Cichocka A. Soral W. The psychology of conspiracy 2015 Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group 145 161
- Kowalski J. Gawęda Ł Persecutory beliefs predict adherence to epidemiological safety guidelines over time–a longitudinal study Psychological Medicine 2020 1 2 PMC7399151 32684186
- Kuncewicz D. Dragan M. Hardt J. Walidacja polskiej wersji kwestionariusza The Symptom Checklist-27-plus [Validation of the Polish version of the symptom checklist-27-plus questionnaire] Psychiatria polska 48 2 2014 345 358 Retrieved from http://www.psychiatriapolska.pl/uploads/images/PP_2_2014/345Kuncewicz_PsychiatrPol2_2014.pdf 25016771
- Marinthe G. Brown G. Delouvée S. Jolley D. Looking out for myself: Exploring the relationship between conspiracy mentality, perceived personal risk and COVID-19 prevention measures British Journal of Health Psychology 25 4 2020 957 980 10.31234/osf.io/cm9st 32583540 PMC7361332 · DOI
- Nyhan B. Reifler J. Richey S. Freed G.L. Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomised trial Pediatrics 133 4 2014 e835 e842 10.1542/peds.2013-2365 24590751 · DOI · Paper page
- Perez V. Uddin M. Galea S. Monto A.S. Aiello A.E. Stress, adherence to preventive measures for reducing influenza transmission and influenza-like illness Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 66 7 2012 605 610 10.1136/jech.2010.117002 21224242 · DOI
- Prati G. Pietrantoni L. Zani B. Compliance with recommendations for pandemic influenza H1N1 2009: the role of trust and personal beliefs Health Education Research 26 5 2011 761 769 21613380
- Schutters S.I.J. Dominguez M.-D.-G. Knappe S. Lieb R. van Os J. Schruers K.R.J. Wittchen H.-U. The association between social phobia, social anxiety cognitions and paranoid symptoms Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 125 3 2012 213 227 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01787.x 22077136 · DOI
- von Gemmingen M.J. Sullivan B.F. Pomerantz A.M. Investigating the relationships between boredom proneness, paranoia, and self-consciousness Personality and Individual Differences 34 6 2003 907 919 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00219-7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gwadiso, X. A., Taliep, N., Ismail, G., James (née Louw), S., & Swart, L.-A. (2025) · Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology · doi:10.1155/jts5/8167323 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kowalski, J., Marchlewska, M., Molenda, Z., Górska, P., & Gawęda, Ł.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Psychology (PL)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Kowalski, Joachim
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 294
- Pages
- 113540
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7590639
- OpenAlex
- W3096503744
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 26.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2017/26/M/HS6/00689)
- Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (0013/2019, 2019-2021)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, conspiracy beliefs, self-isolation, boredom, media trust, anxiety
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paranoid Disorders, Patient Compliance, Poland, Quarantine, Safety, Trust, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review