Cited by 92Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Modeling cortisol rhythms in a population-based study

Ranjit, Nalini, Young, Elizabeth A., Raghunathan, Trivellore E., Kaplan, George A.·2005·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

The aim of these analyses was to develop and describe easily implementable, yet information rich, approaches for analysis of the temporal profile of cortisol in human populations. A typical waking profile of cortisol in a sample of women aged 15-44 was parameterized by a piecewise linear regression model, implemented as a mixed model to accommodate repeated observations among individuals. The model was extended to distinguish characteristic cortisol profiles of obese women from those of non-obese women. Sharp inflection points for the diurnal profile of cortisol were noted at 30 and 75 min past awakening. Obese women showed a slight tendency to have a less sharply rising and declining response to awakening than non-obese women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.003

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sample collection occurred between 2 and 4 pm for all subjects to control for circadian variation in cortisol levels.

    “Sample collection occurred between 2 and 4 pm for all subjects to control for circadian variation in cortisol levels (Dorn et al., 2007; Ranjit et al., 2005).”

    From Effects of intranasal oxytocin on social anxiety in males with fragile X syndrome (2012) · cites this paper as Ranjit et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranjit, N., Young, E. A., Raghunathan, T. E., & Kaplan, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Ranjit, Nalini
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
615-624
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146775256
Cited by
92
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Joyce Foundation
  • Charles Stewart Mott Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 01931, K05MH001931)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50-HD38986, R24HD047861, P50HD038986)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
cortisol rhythm, obesity, women, piecewise linear regression, mixed models, repeated measures, inflection point, population-based study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Circadian Rhythm, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Middle Aged, Obesity, Population, Regression Analysis, Saliva, Work, Single Parent, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review