Cited by 285Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Oxytocin, brain physiology, and functional connectivity: A review of intranasal oxytocin fMRI studies

Bethlehem, Richard A.I., van Honk, Jack, Auyeung, Bonnie, Baron-Cohen, Simon·2013·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

In recent years the neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) has become one of the most studied peptides of the human neuroendocrine system. Research has shown widespread behavioural effects and numerous potential therapeutic benefits. However, little is known about how OT triggers these effects in the brain. Here, we discuss some of the physiological properties of OT in the human brain including the long half-life of neuropeptides, the diffuse projections of OT throughout the brain and interactions with other systems such as the dopaminergic system. These properties indicate that OT acts without clear spatial and temporal specificity. Therefore, it is likely to have widespread effects on the brain's intrinsic functioning. Additionally, we review studies that have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) concurrently with OT administration. These studies reveal a specific set of 'social' brain regions that are likely to be the strongest targets for OT's potential to influence human behaviour. On the basis of the fMRI literature and the physiological properties of the neuropeptide, we argue that OT has the potential to not only modulate activity in a set of specific brain regions, but also the functional connectivity between these regions. In light of the increasing knowledge of the behavioural effects of OT in humans, studies of the effects of OT administration on brain function can contribute to our understanding of the neural networks in the social brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.10.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous oxytocin studies are male biased and often constrained by task-based inferences.

    “Previous oxytocin studies are male biased and often constrained by task-based inferences.”
  • The widespread effects of oxytocin on complex human social behavior may be due to distributed influence at a neural circuit level.

    “We have theorized that the widespread effects of oxytocin on complex human social behavior may be due to distributed influence at a neural circuit level.9”
  • fMRI techniques require study subjects to be restrained during examination, rendering them impractical for examining natural triggers or effects of oxytocin on animals and humans when engaged in contexts representative of natural social and environmental life.

    “fMRI techniques are also not yet at a point where study subjects can be anything other than restrained during the examination (e.g., Bethlehem et al., 2012; Rilling et al., 2012), rendering them impractical for examining natural triggers or effects of oxytocin on animals and humans when engaged in contexts representative of natural social and environmental life.”
  • The hypothesis that central OTR activation modulates correlated activity across distributed brain networks is consistent with continually emerging data from experiments in primates.

    “The hypothesis that central OTR activation modulates correlated activity across distributed brain networks is consistent with continually emerging data from experiments in primates.”

    From Oxytocin receptors modulate a social salience neural network in male prairie voles (2017) · cites this paper as Bethlehem et al., 2013

  • Intranasal OT administration modulates correlated fluctuations in BOLD responses across limbic, striatal, cortical, and/or brainstem nuclei during a variety of social contexts in rhesus macaques and humans.

    “For example, fMRI experiments in both rhesus macaques and humans have found that intranasal OT administration modulates correlated fluctuations in BOLD responses across limbic, striatal, cortical, and/or brainstem nuclei during a variety of social contexts (Bethlehem et al., 2013; Gorka et al., 2015; Kirsch et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2015; Riem et al., 2012; Rilling et al., 2012).”

    From Oxytocin receptors modulate a social salience neural network in male prairie voles (2017) · cites this paper as Bethlehem et al., 2013

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 96 · Cited by 285

Authors
Bethlehem, R. A. I., van Honk, J., Auyeung, B., & Baron-Cohen, S.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Bethlehem, Richard A.I.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
962-974
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025822303
Cited by
285
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, intranasal administration, functional connectivity, social brain, dopaminergic system, brain regions, artificial neural networks, social behavior, neuroendocrine system
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Oxytocin, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review