Cited by 113Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Oxytocin receptors modulate a social salience neural network in male prairie voles

Open access
Johnson, Zachary V., Walum, Hasse, Xiao, Yao, Riefkohl, Paula C., Young, Larry J.·2017·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

&NA; Social behavior is regulated by conserved neural networks across vertebrates. Variation in the organization of neuropeptide systems across these networks is thought to contribute to individual and species diversity in network function during social contexts. For example, oxytocin (OT) is an ancient neuropeptide that binds to OT receptors (OTRs) in the brain and modulates social and reproductive behavior across vertebrate species, including humans. Central OTRs exhibit extraordinarily diverse expression patterns that are associated with individual and species differences in social behavior. In voles, OTR density in the nucleus accumbens (NAc)—a region important for social and reward learning—is associated with individual and species variation in social attachment behavior. Here we test whether OTRs in the NAc modulate a social salience network (SSN)—a network of interconnected brain nuclei thought to encode valence and incentive salience of sociosensory cues—during a social context in the socially monogamous male prairie vole. Using a selective OTR antagonist, we test whether activation of OTRs in the NAc during sociosexual interaction and mating modulates expression of the immediate early gene product Fos across nuclei of the SSN. We show that blockade of endogenous OTR signaling in the NAc during sociosexual interaction and mating does not strongly modulate levels of Fos expression in individual nodes of the network, but strongly modulates patterns of correlated Fos expression between the NAc and other SSN nuclei. HighlightsOxytocin receptor (OTR) signaling in NAc does not modulate male mating behavior.Mating induces Fos‐ir across a social salience network (SSN).During mating, Fos‐ir across SSN nuclei is correlated with Fos‐ir in the NAc shell.Blocking accumbal OTRs decouples the NAc shell from the SSN. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Site-specific blockade of oxytocin receptors (OTRs) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of male prairie voles did not strongly alter Fos expression in individual social salience network (SSN) nuclei during sociosexual interaction and mating, but it strongly disrupted correlated Fos expression between the NAc shell and other SSN nodes. The authors conclude that endogenous accumbal OTR signaling modulates distributed network coupling rather than uniform regional activity.

Key findings

  • OTR antagonist (OTA) in the NAc did not significantly change Fos-ir across brain regions among mated males (aCSF-mated vs OTA-mated: t1,20 = 0.87, p = 0.39), while mating itself increased Fos-ir across the SSN (t1,25 = 4.49, p < 0.001), in all analyzed nuclei except the VTA.
  • OTA strongly reduced correlated Fos-ir between the NAc shell and other SSN nuclei: non-accumbal SSN Fos-ir explained R² = 0.91 of NAc shell Fos-ir variance in aCSF-treated animals versus R² = 0.20 in OTA-treated animals (71% difference, permutation p = 0.02); residual variance was greater in OTA- (σ² = 0.82) than aCSF-treated subjects (σ² = 0.05; F1,20 = 17.25, p < 0.001).
  • Global covariance across the SSN did not differ by treatment: first principal component variance explained differed by <0.01 (p = 0.98).
  • NAc OTA did not alter mating frequency (aCSF: 4.11 ± 1.05 intromission bouts/30 min; OTA: 5.56 ± 1.19; z = 1.328, p = 0.184) or analyzed sociosexual behaviors among mated animals (treatment effect F1,109 ≤ 0.01, p > 0.99, Eta-squared < 0.01). A non-significant trend suggested increased NAc shell Fos-ir in OTA-treated subjects (t1,20 = 1.85, p = 0.08).

Methods

  • Sexually naïve adult male prairie voles received bilateral cannulation targeting the dorsal NAc shell, then microinjection of either 500 nL aCSF or 2.5 ng/μL OTA 3 h before a 30-min video-recorded cohabitation with a sexually experienced, ovariectomized, estrogen-primed adult female; unexposed controls had cage/bedding disturbance without a female.
  • Fos immunohistochemistry was quantified in seven SSN nuclei: NAc shell, anterior olfactory nucleus, prefrontal cortex, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, medial amygdala, basolateral amygdala, and ventral tegmental area. Fos analyses were restricted to subjects that mated (aCSF n = 11; OTA n = 12); behavioral analyses included aCSF n = 13, OTA n = 15, and aCSF-unexposed n = 5.
  • Analyses used linear mixed-effects models with immunohistochemistry batch and subject ID as random effects, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and Poisson regression for behavior, and multiple linear regression, PCA, and permutation testing for Fos covariance.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the neuronal phenotypes and anatomical projections of Fos-positive neurons in each SSN nucleus are unknown; that site-specific OTA targets all region-specific OTRs, obscuring roles dependent on neuronal phenotype and cellular localization; that experiments focused on OTRs in a single SSN nucleus in male prairie voles, so future work is needed on other systems, brain areas, female subjects, behavioral contexts, and species; and that site-specific OTR blockade likely does not reflect natural intra- and interspecific variation in OTR expression and signaling.
  • The text also notes that locomotion per se could not be directly analyzed, although the authors argue active behaviors did not differ between treatment groups.
  • Evident from the text: Fos covariance is correlational and cannot establish causal direction; the unexposed control group was small (n = 5); and Fos analyses excluded non-mated subjects, limiting generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 54 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Fos-ir did not significantly differ between aCSF-mated and OTA-mated animals across brain regions.

    “This test showed that Fos-ir did not significantly differ between aCSF-mated and OTA-mated animals across brain regions (t1,20 = 0.87, p = 0.39).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Sociosexual interaction and mating with the stimulus female was associated with increased Fos-ir across SSN nuclei in the present experiments.

    “These analyses revealed significantly increased Fos-ir in aCSF-mated (t2,24 = 3.74, p = 0.001) and OTA-mated (t2,24 = 4.47, p < 0.001) subjects compared to unexposed controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Blockade of endogenous OTR signaling in the NAc during sociosexual interaction and mating does not strongly modulate levels of Fos expression in individual nodes of the SSN.

    “We show that blockade of endogenous OTR signaling in the NAc during sociosexual interaction and mating does not strongly modulate levels of Fos expression in individual nodes of the network”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The SSN is a neural network that modulates selective social attachment and other forms of associative social learning by attaching valence and incentive salience to sociosensory cues.
  • Findingown data

    aCSF-treated males engaged in an average frequency of 4.11 ± 1.05 intromission bouts per 30 min with the stimulus female compared to 5.56 ± 1.19 bouts per 30 min in OTA-treated males.

    “aCSF-treated males (n = 13) engaged in an average frequency of 4.11 ± 1.05 intro-mission bouts per 30 min with the stimulus female compared to 5.56 ± 1.19 bouts per 30 min in OTA-treated males (n = 15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Among mated animals, OTA versus aCSF treatment had no detectable effect on any of the analyzed sociosexual behaviors.

    “Thus, among mated animals, OTA versus aCSF treatment had no detectable effect on any of the analyzed sociosexual behaviors”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The NAc is anatomically positioned as an integration hub within the SSN, receiving direct projections from every other SSN nucleus except the AON, including direct OTergic axonal projections from the PVN.

    “The NAc is anatomically positioned as an integration hub within the SSN, receiving direct projections from every other SSN nucleus—with the exception of the AON—including direct OTergic axonal projections from the PVN”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ross et al., 2009a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The social decision-making network (SDMN) is thought to modulate social communication, parenting, sexual, and aggressive behaviors across vertebrates.

    “the social decision-making network (SDMN) represents a synthesis of previously described social behavior and mesolimbic reward networks, and is thought to modulate social communication, parenting, sexual, and aggressive behaviors across vertebrates”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goodson, 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites O'Connell and Hofmann, 2011, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation

    Organizational plasticity of steroid hormone and neuropeptide systems across the SDMN is an important mechanism contributing to diversity in distributed network function and social behavior within and across species.

    “It is further hypothesized that organizational plasticity of steroid hormone and neuropeptide systems across the SDMN is an important mechanism contributing to diversity in distributed network function and social behavior within and across species”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Barrett et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cardoso et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Goodson, 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The NAc is an SSN and SDMN nucleus in which OTRs (or homologous OT-like receptors) are variably expressed across distant vertebrate lineages.

    “Briefly, the NAc is a SSN (and SDMN) nucleus in which OTRs (or homologous OT-like receptors) are variably expressed across distant vertebrate lineages”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O'Connell and Hofmann, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Critical functional roles of central and region-specific OTR populations in modulating social behavior have been demonstrated using selective OTR antagonists (OTAs), viral vector-mediated gene transfer, and/or RNAi knockdown in fishes, birds, and mammals.

    “The critical functional roles of central and region-specific OTR populations in modulating social behavior have been demonstrated using selective OTR antagonists (OTAs), viral vector-mediated gene transfer, and/or RNAi knockdown in fishes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Goodson and Bass, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Goodson et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bosch and Neumann, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Central OTRs exhibit extraordinarily diverse expression patterns that are associated with individual and species differences in social behavior.

    “Central OTRs exhibit extraordinarily diverse expression patterns that are associated with individual and species differences in social behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Anacker and Beery, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Goodson, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Johnson and Young, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Central distribution patterns and region-specific densities of OTRs have undergone rapid evolutionary divergence between closely related species of birds and mammals that exhibit divergent social behavior.

    “Central distribution patterns and region-specific densities of OT receptors (OTRs) have undergone rapid evolutionary divergence between closely related species of birds and mammals that exhibit divergent social behavior”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Anacker and Beery, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Goodson, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Johnson and Young, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous experiments in non-mammalian species have used correlated expression of cytochrome oxidase and immediate early genes (IEGs) to demonstrate that distributed patterns of transcriptional and metabolic activity across SDMN nuclei are strongly predictive of social context and behavior.

    “Previous experiments in non-mammalian species have used correlated expression of cytochrome oxidase (a metabolic marker) and immediate early genes (IEGs) to demonstrate that distributed patterns of transcriptional and metabolic activity across SDMN nuclei are strongly predictive of social context and behavior”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hoke et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sakata et al., 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Teles et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    OT is a highly conserved neuropeptide that modulates reproductive physiology and behavior across bilaterian animals, including nematode worms, rodents, and humans.

    “OT is a highly conserved neuro-peptide that modulates reproductive physiology and behavior across bilaterian animals, including nematode worms, rodents, and humans”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Garrison et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grinevich et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lee et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation

    Distributed patterns of activity across the network more strongly reflect social context and behavior than activity within individual brain regions.

    “It is explicitly hypothesized that distributed patterns of activity across the network more strongly reflect social context and behavior than activity within individual brain regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goodson and Kabelik, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXTR polymorphisms in the prairie vole robustly predict individual differences in OTR density in the NAc as well as pair bonding behavior.

    “However, it is important to note that OXTR polymorphisms in the prairie vole robustly predict individual differences in OTR density in the NAc as well as pair bonding behavior (King et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites King et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    These experiments focused on OTRs in a single SSN nucleus in male prairie voles.

    “Thirdly, these experiments focused on OTRs in a single SSN nucleus in male prairie voles. Future investigations of other steroid and neuropeptide systems, additional brain areas, female subjects, and alternative behavioral contexts and species are needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Sociosexual interaction and mating, but not OTR blockade in the NAc, strongly influenced levels of Fos-ir across SSN nuclei.

    “These results suggest that sociosexual interaction and mating, but not OTR blockade in the NAc, strongly influenced levels of Fos-ir across SSN nuclei.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.3. Fos-ir across the SSN · boosted
      “interaction and mating, but not OTR blockade in the NAc, strongly influenced levels of Fos-ir across SSN nuclei.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The SSN is a neural network that modulates selective social attachment and other forms of associative social learning by attaching valence and incentive salience to sociosensory cues.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Batch was included as a random effect in all linear mixed-effects regression analyses of raw Fos-ir count values to control for differences between batches.

    “To control for differences between batches, batch was included as a random effect in all linear mixed-effects regression analyses of raw Fos-ir count values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Anatomical placement of cannula implants was validated and subjects were included only if the cannulation track terminated within 0.5 mm of the dorsal NAc.

    “Subjects were included if the cannulation track terminated within 0.5 mm of the dorsal NAc.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Central and region-specific OTR signaling contribute to individual and species diversity in distributed neural network function during social contexts.

    “Taken together, these experiments are consistent with hypotheses that central and region-specific OTR signaling contribute to individual and species diversity in distributed neural network function during social contexts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    OTR-mediated promotion of transient network states improves transmission from other nodes of the SSN to the NAc shell, facilitating attachment of salience and valence to sociosensory cues and thereby promoting social learning.

    “This may occur in part through OTR-mediated promotion of transient network states that improve transmission from other nodes of the SSN to the NAc shell, facilitating attachment of salience and valence to sociosensory cues and thereby promoting social learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Correlated Fos-ir between brain regions reflects functional coupling between neuronal populations.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Analyses of Fos-ir were restricted to subjects that mated during cohabitation to maximize divergence in presumed OT signaling between socially-exposed treatment groups.

    “analyses of Fos-ir were restricted to subjects that mated during cohabitation (aCSF, n = 11; OTA, n = 12) to maximize divergence in presumed OT signaling (mating induces OT release) between socially-exposed treatment groups”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Mating induces OT release.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    One subject (aCSF-treated, unexposed) was excluded due to significant backflow during infusion.

    “One subject (aCSF-treated, unexposed) was excluded due to significant backflow during infusion”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Two subjects were excluded; one (OTA-treated, exposed) due to an anterior miss, and a second (aCSF-treated, exposed) due to extensive unilateral leakage of blood through the cannula and into the NAc.

    “Two subjects were excluded; one (OTA-treated, exposed) due to an anterior miss, and a second (aCSF-treated, exposed) due to extensive unilateral leakage of blood through the cannula and into the NAc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Methylation of OXTR in peripheral blood cells is associated with decreased correlated fluctuations in BOLD responses among limbic and cortical regions while viewing fearful and angry faces.

    “Two studies have shown that naturally-occurring polymorphisms in human OXTR (the gene encoding OTR) are associated with correlated fluctuations in BOLD responses between hypothalamic, limbic, and/or cortical brain areas during social tasks (Tost et al., 2010; Tost et al., 2011), and one has shown that methylation of OXTR in peripheral blood cells is associated with decreased correlated fluct”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Puglia et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    These data advance our understanding of how neuropeptide systems modulate distributed network function.

    “Despite these limitations, these data advance our understanding of how neuropeptide systems modulate distributed network function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The hypothesis that central OTR activation modulates correlated activity across distributed brain networks is consistent with continually emerging data from experiments in primates.

    “The hypothesis that central OTR activation modulates correlated activity across distributed brain networks is consistent with continually emerging data from experiments in primates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bethlehem et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gorka et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kirsch et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Neuronal phenotypes and anatomical projections of Fos-positive neurons within each SSN nucleus are unknown, limiting identification of anatomically interconnected neuronal subpopulations that become functionally connected during social contexts.

    “Firstly, the neuronal phenotypes and anatomical projections of Fos-positive neurons within each SSN nucleus are unknown, and therefore identifying anatomically interconnected neuronal subpopulations that become functionally connected during social contexts is a critical area for future investigation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Naturally-occurring polymorphisms in human OXTR are associated with correlated fluctuations in BOLD responses between hypothalamic, limbic, and/or cortical brain areas during social tasks.

    “Two studies have shown that naturally-occurring polymorphisms in human OXTR (the gene encoding OTR) are associated with correlated fluctuations in BOLD responses between hypothalamic, limbic, and/or cortical brain areas during social tasks (Tost et al., 2010; Tost et al., 2011), and one has shown that methylation of OXTR in peripheral blood cells is associated with decreased correlated fluct”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Tost et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tost et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Central Fos-ir reflects rapid adaptation of neuronal and synaptic physiology in response to synaptic input through robust transcriptional regulation, and has been linked with depolarization in many, but not all, neuronal phenotypes.

    “Thus, central Fos-ir is thought to reflect rapid adaptation of neuronal and synaptic physiology in response to synaptic input through robust transcriptional regulation, and has been linked with depolarization in many, but not all, neuronal phenotypes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kawashima et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lyons and West, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

26 of 26
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Few studies have directly tested links between neuropeptide signaling and distributed network function.

    “Although hypothesized links between neuropeptide signaling and distributed network function are consistent with a large body of literature, few studies have directly tested them.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No experiments to date have tested whether endogenous activation of region-specific OTR populations during social contexts modulates activity-dependent markers across distributed neural networks.

    “To our knowledge, no experiments to date have tested whether endogenous activation of region-specific OTR populations during social contexts modulates activity-dependent markers (e.g. IEGs) across distributed neural networks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mating induces OT release.

    “mating induces OT release”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The SSN is a neural network that modulates selective social attachment and other forms of associative social learning by attaching valence and incentive salience to sociosensory cues.

    “Briefly, the SSN is a neural network that is hypothesized to modulate selective social attachment and other forms of associative social learning by attaching valence and incentive salience to sociosensory cues.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    OTA selectively blocks OTRs in the NAc without affecting other receptors or brain regions.

    “Because we used a selective OTR antagonist to manipulate OTR signaling specifically within the NAc, we tested whether this manipulation influenced local Fos-ir.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Correlated Fos-ir between brain regions reflects functional coupling between neuronal populations.

    “Given the anatomical connectivity between the NAc shell and other SSN nuclei, these data raise the possibility that activation of accumbal OTRs during sociosexual interaction and mating modulates functional coupling between neuronal populations embedded within the NAc shell and neuronal populations embedded across SSN nuclei.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The NAc shell and other SSN nuclei are anatomically connected.

    “Given the anatomical connectivity between the NAc shell and other SSN nuclei, these data raise the possibility that activation of accumbal OTRs during sociosexual interaction and mating modulates functional coupling between neuronal populations embedded within the NAc shell and neuronal populations embedded across SSN nuclei.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In prairie voles, OT signaling stimulated by mating enhances the coordinated activity of multiple brain regions in a social salience network, with OXTR signaling in the NAc acting as a hub for coordinating activity among AON, PVN, BLA, and PFC.

    “In prairie voles, OT signaling stimulated by mating enhances the coordinated activity of multiple brain regions in a social salience network, a grouping of interconnected nodes thought to encode the valence and incentive salience of socio-sensory cues. OXTR signaling in the NAc acts as a hub for coordinating activity among AON, PVN, BLA, and PFC [124].”

    From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [124]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Oxytocin, released by the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), is a critical maternal hormone.

    “Oxytocin1,2,9–15, which is released by the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), is a critical maternal hormone.”
  • In sensory pathways, oxytocin signaling increases the salience of social stimuli by modulating neuron excitability and facilitates the flow of social information across the brain.

    “In sensory pathways, oxytocin signaling increases the salience of social stimuli by modulating neuron excitability and facilitates the flow of social information across the brain [15].”
  • OXT action results in modulation of neuronal activity in brain areas regulating social behaviors to increase the salience and reinforcing value of social stimuli.

    “OXT action results in modulation of neuronal activity in brain areas regulating social behaviors 17 to increase the salience and reinforcing value of social stimuli 18,19.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Behavior ANOVA reports one numerator degree of freedom for five behaviors

    Minor

    The analysis treats five behaviors as a within-subject factor, so its uncorrected main effect and treatment-by-behavior interaction have 5 − 1 = 4 numerator degrees of freedom, not 1 as reported.

    Reported 1 · recomputed 4

  • Residual-variance F-test has incompatible degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The mated groups contain 12 OTA-treated and 11 aCSF-treated animals. An F-test comparing their sample variances would have numerator and denominator degrees of freedom based on those group sizes minus one, not 1 and 20.

    Reported 1 · recomputed 11

2 of 2

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 113

Authors
Johnson, Z. V., Walum, H., Xiao, Y., Riefkohl, P. C., & Young, L. J.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Zachary V.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
87
Pages
16-24
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2546187937
Cited by
113
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01MH096983, 1P50MH100023)
  • NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (OD P51OD11132)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
oxytocin receptor, nucleus accumbens, Microtus ochrogaster, oxytocin receptor antagonist, Fos expression, mating behavior, social attachment, incentive salience, social behavior, neuropeptide signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Arvicolinae, Female, Male, Nerve Net, Nucleus Accumbens, Oxytocin, Pair Bond, Reproduction, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Social Behavior, Receptors, Oxytocin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review