Cited by 55Cancer survivorship and careStress Responses and CortisolCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Diurnal cortisol rhythms, fatigue and psychosocial factors in five-year survivors of ovarian cancer

Open access
Cuneo, Michaela G., Schrepf, Andrew, Slavich, George M., Thaker, Premal H., Goodheart, Michael, Bender, David, Cole, Steve W., Sood, Anil K. +1 more·2017·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Fatigue is a challenge in ovarian cancer survivorship and greatly impacts quality of life. In other cancer populations, fatigue has been associated with abnormal diurnal cortisol patterns. However, little is known about biological and behavioral factors in 5+-year ovarian cancer survivors and potential mechanisms underlying persistent fatigue have not been investigated in this population. Moreover, relationships between neuroendocrine and psychosocial factors in 5+-year ovarian cancer survivors have not been studied. We addressed these issues by examining relationships between diurnal cortisol rhythms, fatigue, life stress, and social support in 30 survivors of ovarian cancer who were assessed at least 5 years (mean=6.20years) following their primary diagnosis. Flatter diurnal cortisol slopes were associated with higher levels of fatigue, suggesting a role for HPA-axis dysregulation in sustained fatigue experienced by survivors. Moreover, greater cumulative lifetime stressor exposure (p=0.023) and stressor severity (p=0.004) were associated with flatter diurnal cortisol slopes, while higher social attachment (p=0.001) was associated with steeper diurnal cortisol slopes. These findings suggest that ovarian cancer survivors with greater lifetime stress exposure or lower social attachment may be at increased risk for circadian rhythm disruption, which in turn is associated with fatigue. Future research should examine relationships of clinical stage and inflammatory cytokines to cortisol rhythms and fatigue in long-term ovarian cancer survivors, as well as investigating the clinical significance of abnormal diurnal cortisol profiles in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.06.019

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher Adult STRAIN scores have been associated with worse mental and physical health and poorer cognitive, biological, and clinical functioning across several studies and health contexts.

    “Higher Adult STRAIN scores have also been associated with worse mental and physical health, as well as poorer cognitive, biological, clinical functioning across several different studies and distinct health contexts (e.g., Bower et al. 2014; Cuneo et al. 2017; Dooley et al. 2017; Goldfarb et al. 2017; Lam et al. 2019; Shields et al. 2017a, b; Slavich and Shields 2018; Toussaint et al. 2016).”

    From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Cuneo et al. 2017

  • The STRAIN has previously been validated against health-relevant biomarkers.

    “we have previously validated the STRAIN against health-relevant biomarkers (27,28,30)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuneo, M. G., Schrepf, A., Slavich, G. M., Thaker, P. H., Goodheart, M., Bender, D., Cole, S. W., Sood, A. K., & Lutgendorf, S. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lutgendorf, Susan K.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
84
Pages
139-142
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2731138358
Cited by
55
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (T32 GM108540, CA193249, CA140933, CA104825, CA109298)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
ovarian cancer survivors, cancer-related fatigue, diurnal cortisol rhythm, HPA axis dysregulation, life events, social support, social attachment, circadian rhythm disruption, psychosocial factors, neuroendocrine factors
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Ovarian Neoplasms, Psychology, Quality of Life, Saliva, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review