Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“If it can be done, it will be done:” AI Ethical Standards and a dual role for public relations

Bowen, Shannon A.·2024·Public Relations Review

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102513

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Adi, A. (Ed.). (2023a). Artificial Intelligence in public relations and communications: Cases, reflections, and predictions. Quadriga University of Applied Sciences.
  2. Adi, A. (Ed.). (2023b). Artificial Intelligence in Public Relations and Communications: cases, reflections, and predictions. Quadriga University of Applied Sciences.
  3. Anderson, 2007, Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent, AI Magazine, 28, 15
  4. Bivins, 1992, A systems model for ethical decision making in public relations, Public Relations Review, 18, 365, 10.1016/0363-8111(92)90029-X · doi:10.1016/0363-8111(92)90029-x
  5. Bostrom, 2005, Transhumanist values. Ethical issues for the 21st century, Journal of Philosophical Research, 30, 3, 10.5840/jpr_2005_26 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bostrom, N., Dafoe, A., & Flynn, C. (2017). Policy desiderata in the development of superintelligent AI. In O. U. Future of Humanity Institute (Ed.). Oxford, UK.
  7. Botan, 1997, Ethics in strategic communication campaigns: The case for a new approach to public relations, Journal of Business Communication, 34, 188, 10.1177/002194369703400205 · doi:10.1177/002194369703400205
  8. Bowen, 2008, A state of neglect: Public relations as 'corporate conscience' or ethics counsel, Journal of Public Relations Research, 20, 271, 10.1080/10627260801962749 · doi:10.1080/10627260801962749
  9. Bowen, S.A. (2018). An issues management approach to artificial intelligence (AI) and ethics: A crisis with the rising machines? paper presented at the initial session of the BledCom 25th International Public Relations Symposium, Bled, Slovenia.
  10. Bowen, 2016, Ethics as a pre-cursor to organization-public relationships: Building trust before and during the OPR model., Cogent Social Sciences, 2, 10.1080/23311886.2016.1141467 · DOI
  11. Bowen, S. A. (in press). AI, warfare, and media. In F. Roumate & A. La Rosa (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence, Media and International Security: The Weaponization of AI Use in Media and International Security, Springer.
  12. Brantner, 2021, Covering Technology Risks and Responsibility: Automation, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms in the Media, International Journal of Communication, 15, 5074
  13. Chen, 2020, The role of leadership in shared value creation from the public’s perspective: A multi-continental study, Public Relations Review, 46, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.006 · DOI
  14. Chifu, I., & Simons, G. (Eds.). (2023). Rethinking Warfare in the 21st Century: The Influence and Effects of the Politics, Information and Communication Mix. Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/9781009355247
  15. Coffin, 2022, Asking Questions of AI Advertising: A Maieutic Approach, Journal of Advertising, 51, 608, 10.1080/00913367.2022.2111728 · DOI
  16. du Plessis, 2018, Social media crisis communication: Enhancing a discourse of renewal through dialogic content, Public Relations Review, 44, 829, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.003 · DOI
  17. Galloway, 2018, Public relations and artificial intelligence: It’s not (just) about robots, Public Relations Review, 44, 734, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.008 · DOI
  18. Gaur, M., Desai, A., Faldu, K., & Sheth, A. (2020). Explainable AI using knowledge graphs. ACM CoDS-COMAD Conference, San Diego, CA.
  19. Gill, 2023, AI & society, knowledge, culture and communication, AI Society, 38, 1809, 10.1007/s00146-023-01759-1 · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01759-1
  20. Goodpaster, 1982, Can a corporation have a conscience?, Harvard Business Review, 60, 132
  21. Gouda, 2020, Application of Artificial Intelligence in Advertising & Public Relations and Emerging Ethical Issues in the Ecosystem, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29, 7561
  22. Greene, J., Rossi, F., Tasioulas, J., Venable, K.B., & Williams, B. (2016). Embedding Ethical Principles in Collective Decision Support Systems. · DOI
  23. Haefner, 2020, Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda., Technological Forecasting Social Change, 162, 1
  24. Haidt, 2013, Moral psychology for the twenty-first century, Journal of Moral Education, 42, 281, 10.1080/03057240.2013.817327 · DOI
  25. Héder, 2023, The epistemic opacity of autonomous systems and the ethical consequences, AI Society, 38, 1819, 10.1007/s00146-020-01024-9 · DOI
  26. Hermann, 2022, Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Marketing for Social Good—An Ethical Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 179, 43, 10.1007/s10551-021-04843-y · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hubinger, E., Denison, C., Mu, J., Lambert, M., Tong, M., MacDiarmid, M., Lanham, T., Ziegler, D.M., Maxwell, T., Cheng, N., Jermyn, A., Askell, A., Radhakrishnan, A., Anil, C., Duvenaud, D., Ganguli, D., Barez, F., Clark, J., Ndousse, K., … Mindermann, S. (2024). Sleepr agents: Training deceptive LLMs that persist through safety training (arXiv, Issue. 1 arXiv:2401.05566v3 [cs.CR] 17 Jan 2024. · arXiv
  28. Hunter, A. (2015). On Keeping Secrets: Intelligent Agents and the Ethics of Information Hiding. Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Papers from the 2015 AAAI Workshop, Austin, TX.
  29. Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (T. E. M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge. ((Original work published 1785)). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kent, 2002, Toward a dialogic theory of public relations, Public Relations Review, 28, 21, 10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kim, 2021, Taking Principles Seriously: A Hybrid Approach to Value Alignment in Articial Intelligence, Journal of Articial Intelligence Research, 70, 871, 10.1613/jair.1.12481 · DOI
  32. Krishan, 2023, Role of Quantum Computing in Transformation of Artificial Intelligence - A Review, 2022, 293
  33. Lepri, 2021, Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence, iScience, 24, 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102249 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Lieber, 2008, Moral development public relations: Measuring duty to society in strategic communication, Public Relations Review, 34, 244, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.03.028 · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.03.028
  35. Liew, 2021, Artificial Intelligence Disruption in Public Relations: A Blessing or A Challenge?, Journal of Digital Marketing and Communication, 1, 24, 10.53623/jdmc.v1i1.45 · DOI
  36. Ljepava, 2022, AI-Enabled Marketing Solutions in Marketing Decision Making: AI Application in Different Stages of Marketing Process, Temario Journal, 11, 1308, 10.18421/TEM113-40 · DOI
  37. Mikalef, 2021, Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance, Information Management, 58, 10.1016/j.im.2021.103434 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Musk, E., & Neuralink. (2019). An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. bioRxiv, 703801. https://doi.org/10.1101/703801. · DOI
  39. Mustak, 2021, Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, research agenda, Journal of Business Research, 124, 389, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.044 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Mustak, 2021, Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda, Journal of Business Research, 124, 389, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.044 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Neill, 2021, Employee perceptions of ethical listening in U.S. organizations, Public Relations Review, 47, 1, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102123 · DOI
  42. Neill, 2012, PR professionals as organizational conscience. Journal of Mass Media, Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 27, 220
  43. Pang, 2013, Social media hype in times of crises: Nature, characteristics and impact on organizations, Asia Pacific Media Educator, 23, 309, 10.1177/1326365X13517189 · DOI
  44. Pratt, 1994, Research progress in public relations ethics: An overview, Public Relations Review, 20, 217, 10.1016/0363-8111(94)90036-1 · doi:10.1016/0363-8111(94)90036-1
  45. Pratt, 1994, Investigating the application of Deontology among U.S. public relations practitioners. Journal of Public Relations, Research, 6, 241
  46. Roumate, F. (Ed.). (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68647-5. · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68647-5
  47. Ryan, 1983, The pr officer as corporate conscience, Public Relations Quarterly, 28, 20
  48. Scheessele, 2022, The hard limit on human nonanthropocentrism, AI Society, 37, 49, 10.1007/s00146-021-01182-4 · DOI
  49. Sestino, 2022, Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Business: Implications, Applications and Methods, Technology Analysis Strategic Management, 34, 16, 10.1080/09537325.2021.1883583 · DOI
  50. Sheth, A., & Roy, K. (2024). Neurosymbolic value-inspired AI (why, what, and how). IEEE Intelligent Systems., (Accepted article). · DOI
  51. Sims, 1991, The institutionalization of organizational ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 493, 10.1007/BF00383348 · DOI
  52. Sims, R.R. (1994). Ethics and organizational decision making: A call for renewal. Quorum. · doi:10.5040/9798216967255
  53. Singer, P. (Ed.). (1994). Ethics. Oxford University Press.
  54. Soriano, 2021, Engaging universe 4.0: The case for forming a public relations-strategic intelligence hybrid, Public Relations Review, 47
  55. Spicer, 2000, Public relations in a democratic society: Value and values, Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 115, 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_7 · doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1201_7
  56. Vlačić, 2021, The evolving role of artificial intelligence in marketing: A review and research agenda, Journal of Business Research, 128, 187, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.055 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Whittlestone, 2021, The Societal Implications of Deep Reinforcement Learning, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 1003, 10.1613/jair.1.12360 · DOI
  58. Wright, 1985, Can age predict the moral values of public relations practitioners?, Public Relations Review, 11, 51, 10.1016/S0363-8111(85)80061-8 · doi:10.1016/s0363-8111(85)80061-8
  59. Wright, 1989, Ethics research in public relations: An overview, Public Relations Review, 15, 3, 10.1016/S0363-8111(89)80049-9 · doi:10.1016/s0363-8111(89)80049-9
  60. Xu, S., Kee, K.F., Li, W., Yamamoto, M., & Riggs, R.E. Examining the Diffusion of Innovations from a Dynamic, Differential-Effects Perspective: A Longitudinal Study on AI Adoption Among Employees. Communication Research, 0(0), 00936502231191832. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231191832. · DOI
  61. Zerfass, 2020, Artificial intelligence in communication management: A cross-national study on adoption and knowledge, impact, challenges and risks, Journal of Communication Management, 24, 377, 10.1108/JCOM-10-2019-0137 · DOI
  62. Zhao, 2020, How publics react to situational and renewing organizational responses across crises: Examining SCCT and DOR in social-mediated crises, Public Relations Review, 46, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101944 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bowen, S. A.
Venue
Public Relations Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
102513
ISSN
0363-8111
Cited by
66
References
8
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • South Carolina Research Foundation
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Southern California
  • National Science Foundation Directorate for Technology Innovation and Partnerships (2137806)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.