Cited by 9Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Association between household physical activity level and type 2 diabetes among urban males in northern China

Yang, J., Zhang, Y.L., Ye, J., Guo, Q., Sun, Y.N., Zeng, Q.·2018·Public Health

Abstract

Objectives Physical activity contributes to preventing type 2 diabetes (T2D). Doing housework is an unstructured mild-intensity physical activity. We aimed to investigate the association between household physical activity level (HPAL) and T2D in urban Chinese men. Study design This is a cross-sectional study. Methods This study contained 13,862 male adults aged 35-78 (48.4 ± 7.1) years. According to the self-reported time (hours/day [h/d]) spent on housework, they were stratified into three levels: 0 h/d, >0-2 h/d, and >2 h/d. The association of HPAL with T2D was investigated by logistic regression analysis. Results The odds ratios (ORs) for T2D across increasing categories of HPAL were 1.00 (reference), 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.89), and 0.60 (95% CI 0.51-0.70), respectively (P for trend <0.001), after adjusting for confounding factors. Further adjustment for waist circumference or body mass index (BMI) had a minimal impact on these ORs. The inverse association of HPAL with T2D was persistent in subgroup analyses based on age, hypertension, family history of diabetes, smoking, BMI, waist circumstance, and fasting plasma glucose level. Conclusion Our findings indicated that HPAL was inversely associated with the risk of T2D among urban males in northern China. This implied that household physical activity may contribute to long-term glucose control. Well-designed longitudinal studies are required to improve our understanding of this association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.010

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An observational study of 15,000 Chinese men found an inverse relationship between increased hours of household physical activity and incidence of type 2 diabetes.

    “One observational study of 15,000 Chinese men found an inverse relationship between increased hours performing household PA and incidence of T2DM.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., Zhang, Y. L., Ye, J., Guo, Q., Sun, Y. N., & Zeng, Q.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Q.
Venue
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
163
Pages
113-120
ISSN
0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888610876
Cited by
9
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science and Technology Service Network Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-STS-ZDTP-033)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, household physical activity, housework, diabetes risk, waist circumference, body mass index, glycemic control, northern China
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Household Work, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Urban Population, Exercise, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review