Cited by 38Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Growing propensity of internet addiction among Asian college students: meta-analysis of pooled prevalence from 39 studies with over 50,000 participants

Duc, Tran Quang, Chi, Vu Thi Quynh, Huyen, Nguyen Thi Hoa, Quang, Phan Ngoc, Thuy, Bui Thi, Nguyen Di, Khanh·2024·Public Health

Abstract

Objectives Rapid internet penetration and technological advancements have facilitated accessibility to internet-enabled devices globally. Since Asia lacks comprehensive data on internet addiction among college students, this review aims to estimate its pooled prevalence. Study design This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from their inception through August 2022 using terms appropriate to internet addiction and Asian countries/territorial for publications in English peer-reviewed journals. The studies included those done on current college students and provided unambiguous indicators of the threshold of internet addiction. The pooled prevalence was calculated through a random-effects meta-analysis by RStudio software, and I 2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used for quality assessment. Results Overall, between 2007 and 2021, 39 papers comprising 45 effect sizes and totaling 58,058 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of internet addiction among Asian college students was 24.3% (95% confidence interval: 19.8%-29.5%, Q = 6234, df = 44, τ 2 = 0.79, I 2 = 99.29%), and strikingly, this percentage increased over time. A high degree of heterogeneity was seen, and no publication bias was found. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review report on Asian college students, which found that one-fifth suffer from internet addiction. The findings emphasize the significance of multidisciplinary prevention and management strategies to mitigate the harmful effects of internet addiction. Further research is warranted to develop a standardized diagnostic tool for a more precise estimation of internet addiction among this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.040

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duc, T. Q., Chi, V. T. Q., Huyen, N. T. H., Quang, P. N., Thuy, B. T., & Nguyen Di, K.
Affiliations
VinUniversity (VN)
Venue
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
227
Pages
250-258
ISSN
0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391092340
Cited by
38
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 6
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
internet addiction, prevalence, university students, Asian students, temporal trends, internet use, prevention, diagnostic tools
MeSH terms
Internet Addiction Disorder, Asia, Female, Humans, Male, Students, Universities, Prevalence, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review