Cited by 0Working Capital and Financial PerformanceSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementQuality and Supply Management

Quantifying the effects of accounts payable automation on technology adopters and their suppliers: A difference-in-differences study

Rong, Wanling, Swink, Morgan·2026·Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pursup.2026.101177

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Rong, W., & Swink, M.
Affiliations
Texas Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
Rong, Wanling
Venue
Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-08
Pages
101177
ISSN
1478-4092 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7203568850
Cited by
0
References
59
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Working Capital and Financial Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
buyer-supplier relationships, supplier satisfaction, working capital efficiency, liquidity, days payable outstanding, doubtful receivables, short-term debt, cost reduction, profitability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review