The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
Open accessAbstract
The technological improvement coupled with the growing use of smartphones has, among other functions, facilitated purchase and payment transactions through the mobile phone. This phenomenon occurs worldwide and provides individuals more flexibility and convenience in carrying out their daily activities. This article aims to evaluate the intention of adopting a future mobile payment service from the perspective of current Brazilian consumers of mobile phones, based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). The survey was carried out with mobile customers of a telecommunications company that operates in southeastern Brazil, with a valid sample of 605 respondents. Using structural equation modeling, 76% of behavioral intention was explained through performance expectation, effort expectation, social influence and perceived risk. Perceived cost was found not statistically significant at the level of 5%. This result serves as a guide to participants in the payments market to develop a service for mobile payments of good performance, easy to use, secure and promotes the action of the social circle of the individual at a fair price, in other words, that meets needs and expectations of today's mobile phone users. As well as serves as a stimulus to the development of communication and marketing strategies that highlight these positive attributes and awaken the intention of adoption of the service by the wider range of people as possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009) · Advances in International Marketing · doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2009)0000020014 · Cited by 10,926
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00111-3 · Cited by 3,351
Bither, S. W., Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1971) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250571 · Cited by 2,795
Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking
Luarn, P., & Lin, H.-H. (2005) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003 · Cited by 1,961
Cited by
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212 · Cited by 894
Merhi, M., Hone, K., & Tarhini, A. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101151 · Cited by 555
Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption
Al-Saedi, K., Al-Emran, M., Ramayah, T., & Abusham, E. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293 · Cited by 523
Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Adoption Intention: An Indian Perspective
Shankar, A., & Datta, B. (2018) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150918757870 · Cited by 312
Gupta, K., & Arora, N. (2019) · South Asian Journal of Business Studies · doi:10.1108/sajbs-03-2019-0037 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrahão, R. D. S., Moriguchi, S. N., & Andrade, D. F.
- Venue
- RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-230
- ISSN
- 1809-2039 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2482931780
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 31.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.003
- The paper
- Abrahão, R. D. S., Moriguchi, S. N., & Andrade, D. F. (2016). Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.