Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 877

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR Response Criteria

Fransen, Jaap, van Riel, Piet L.C.M.·2009·Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
DOI 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

\n Contains fulltext :\n 81347.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)\n

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Van der Heijde, 1990, Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a Disease Activity Score, Ann Rheum Dis, 49, 916, 10.1136/ard.49.11.916 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Van der Heijde, 1993, Development of a Disease Activity Score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists, J Rheumatol, 20, 579
  3. Prevoo, 1995, Modified Disease Activity Scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 38, 44, 10.1002/art.1780380107 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Riel van, 1996, Development and validation of response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis: steps towards an international consensus on prognostic markers, Br J Rheumatol, 35, 4, 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_2.4 · DOI
  5. Van Gestel, 1996, Development and validation of the European league against rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 39, 34, 10.1002/art.1780390105 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Van Gestel, 1998, Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts, Arthritis Rheum, 41, 1845, 10.1002/1529-0131(199810)41:10<1845::AID-ART17>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI · Paper page
  7. Van Gestel, 1999, ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials, J Rheumatol, 26, 705
  8. Fransen, 2003, Rheumatoid arthritis measures, Arthritis Rheum, 49, S214, 10.1002/art.11407 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Saag, 2008, American college of rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 59, 762, 10.1002/art.23721 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Grigor, 2004, Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 364, 263, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16676-2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fransen, 2005, The effectiveness of systematic monitoring of RA disease activity in daily practice (TRAC): a multi centre, cluster-randomised controlled trial, Ann Rheum Dis, 64, 1294, 10.1136/ard.2004.030924 · doi:10.1136/ard.2004.030924
  12. Goekoop-Ruiterman, 2009, DAS-driven therapy versus routine care in patients with recent-onset active Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ann Rheum Dis
  13. Fransen, 2005, The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria, Clin Exp Rheumatol, 23, S93
  14. Prevoo, 1996, Remission in a prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Br J Rheumatol, 35, 1101, 10.1093/rheumatology/35.11.1101 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Van der Heijde, 1992, Validity of single variables and composite indices for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis, Ann Rheum Dis, 51, 177, 10.1136/ard.51.2.177 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Salaffi, 2000, Discriminating ability of composite indices for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of the chronic arthritis systemic index, Disease Activity Score and Thompson's articular index, Rheumatology, 39, 90, 10.1093/rheumatology/39.1.90 · DOI
  17. Villaverde, 2000, Activity indices in rheumatoid arthritis, J Rheumatol, 27, 2576
  18. Drossaers-Bakker, 1999, Long-term course and outcome of functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 42, 1854, 10.1002/1529-0131(199909)42:9<1854::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI · Paper page
  19. Welsing, 2001, The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 44, 2009, 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2009::AID-ART349>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI · Paper page
  20. Welsing, 2004, The relationship between disease activity and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal analysis, Arthritis Rheum, 50, 2082, 10.1002/art.20350 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Fransen, 2004, Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: agreement of the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) with the ARA preliminary remission criteria, Rheumatology, 43, 1252, 10.1093/rheumatology/keh297 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Van Riel, 1983, Association of HLA antigens, toxic reactions and therapeutic response to auranofin and aurothioglucose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Tissue Antigens, 22, 194, 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1983.tb01191.x · DOI
  23. American College of Rheumatology Committee to Reevaluate Improvement Criteria, 2007, A proposed revision to the ACR20: the hybrid measure of American college of rheumatology, Arthritis Rheum, 57, 193, 10.1002/art.22552 · DOI
  24. Verhoeven, 2000, Responsiveness of the core set, response criteria, and utilities in early rheumatoid arthritis, Ann Rheum Dis, 39, 966, 10.1136/ard.59.12.966 · DOI
  25. Wells, 2005, Minimal disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary definition, J Rheumatol, 32, 2016
  26. Wolfe, 2001, Consensus recommendations for the assessment and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, J Rheumatol, 28, 1413
  27. Fransen, 2002, The merits of monitoring: should we follow all our rheumatoid arthritis patients in daily practice?, Rheumatology (Oxford), 41, 601, 10.1093/rheumatology/41.6.601 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/41.6.601
  28. Kiely, 2009, Contemporary treatment principles for early rheumatoid arthritis: a consensus statement, Rheumatology (Oxford), 48, 765, 10.1093/rheumatology/kep073 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep073
  29. Felson, 1993, The American college of rheumatology preliminary core-set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials, Arthritis Rheum, 36, 729, 10.1002/art.1780360601 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Farrant, 2007, Advanced imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Part 1: synovitis, Skeletal Radiol, 36, 269, 10.1007/s00256-006-0219-9 · doi:10.1007/s00256-006-0219-9
  31. Farrant, 2007, Advanced imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: part 2: erosions, Skeletal Radiol, 36, 381, 10.1007/s00256-006-0220-3 · doi:10.1007/s00256-006-0220-3
  32. Emery, 2007, Evidence-based review of biologic markers as indicators of disease progression and remission in rheumatoid arthritis, Rheumatol Int, 27, 793, 10.1007/s00296-007-0357-y · DOI
  33. Fransen, 2000, Feasibility and validity of the RADAI, a self-administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index, Rheumatology (Oxford), 39, 321, 10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.321 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Pincus, 2008, RAPID3 (routine assessment of patient index data 3), a rheumatoid arthritis index without formal joint counts for routine care: proposed severity categories compared to DAS and CDAI categories, J Rheumatol, 35, 2136, 10.3899/jrheum.080182 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Pincus, 2008, An index of only patient-reported outcome measures, routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3), in two abatacept clinical trials: similar results to Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and other RAPID indices that include physician-reported measures, Rheumatology (Oxford), 47, 345, 10.1093/rheumatology/kem364 · DOI
  36. Wolfe, 2005, A composite disease activity scale for clinical practice, observational studies, and clinical trials: the patient activity scale (PAS/PAS-II), J Rheumatol, 32, 2410
  37. Bruce, 2005, The health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), Clin Exp Rheumatol, 23, S14
  38. Boers, 1993, The validity of pooled outcome measures (indices) in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials, J Rheumatol, 20, 568
  39. Van der Heijde, 1998, The original DAS and the DAS28 are not interchangeable: comment on the articles by Prevoo et al, Arthritis Rheum, 41, 942, 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<942::AID-ART26>3.0.CO;2-B · doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<942::aid-art26>3.0.co;2-b
  40. Aletaha, 2005, The simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis, Clin Exp Rheumatol, 23, S100

Cited by

See all 877

Metadata

Authors
Fransen, J., & van Riel, P. L. C. M.
Venue
Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
745-757
ISSN
0889-857X
DOI
10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001
OpenAlex
W2001917088
Cited by
877
References
0
FWCI
23.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR Response Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001
The paper
Fransen, J., & van Riel, P. L. C. M. (2009). The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR Response Criteria. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.