Cited by 9Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Comparative effectiveness of various exercise interventions on central sensitisation indices: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Open access
Ibrahim, Aya Abd Elkhabir, McWilliams, Daniel F., Smith, Stephanie L., Chaplin, Wendy J., Salimian, Mitra, Georgopoulos, Vasileios, Kouraki, Afroditi, Walsh, David A.·2025·Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central sensitisation (CS) increases musculoskeletal pain. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) or self-report questionnaires might indicate CS. Indices of CS might be suppressed by exercise, although the optimal exercise regimen remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate effectiveness of different exercise regimens on these CS indices in adults. METHODS: We searched 6 electronic databases from inception to November 2023. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigated effects of exercise on all CS indices. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias. NMA of RCTs compared CS indices between exercise types. Sensitivity analysis using only high-quality studies was performed to verify the robustness of our results. Certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Of the 249 eligible studies identified, 164 were RCTs, of which 89 provided data suitable for NMA. Meta-analysis revealed large improvement of post-intervention CS indices compared to baseline (SMD -0.81, 95 % CI -0.93 to -0.70). All reported categories of exercise, except stretching exercise alone, were more effective than non-exercise controls. Combined exercises that include stretching together with strengthening exercises (SMD -1.67, 95 % Credible Interval (CrI) -2.41 to -0.97), or strengthening, stretching and aerobic components (SMD -1.61, 95 % CrI -2.74 to -0.56) were most effective at reducing CS indices compared to non-exercise controls. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of our findings, particularly for combined stretching and strengthening exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that various exercise interventions are effective in improving CS. Multi-component exercise tends to be the most effective, but some exercise combinations might be better than others. Combined exercise featuring strengthening and stretching components, with or without aerobic exercise, shows the greatest likelihood among other combinations of being the optimal exercise type. These findings might have utility informing future trials and personalising treatment strategies for people with CS features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101894

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pain catastrophizing is associated with reduced physical activity and avoidance of movement, both of which are known to exacerbate central sensitization.

    “Pain catastrophizing is associated with reduced physical activity and avoidance of movement, both of which are known to exacerbate central sensitization.42–44”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibrahim, A. A. E., McWilliams, D. F., Smith, S. L., Chaplin, W. J., Salimian, M., Georgopoulos, V., Kouraki, A., & Walsh, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Ibrahim, Aya Abd Elkhabir
Venue
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
101894
ISSN
1877-0657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406412349
Cited by
9
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Egypt Ministry of Higher Education Cultural Affairs and Missions Sector
  • Ministry of Higher Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
central sensitization, exercise intervention, stretching, resistance training, aerobic exercise, multicomponent exercise, quantitative sensory testing, musculoskeletal pain, exercise type comparison
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis as Topic, Adult, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Central Nervous System Sensitization, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review