Cited by 157Physical Activity and HealthMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Adverse events of exercise therapy in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Niemeijer, Andre, Lund, Hans, Stafne, Signe Nilssen, Ipsen, Thomas, Goldschmidt, Cathrine Luhaäär, Jørgensen, Claus Thomas, Juhl, Carsten B·2020·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relative risk (RR) of serious and non-serious adverse events in patients treated with exercise therapy compared with those in a non-exercising control group. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Primary studies were identified based on The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews investigating the effect of exercise therapy. Eligibility criteria: At least two of the authors independently evaluated all identified reviews and primary studies. Randomised controlled trials were included if they compared any exercise therapy intervention with a non-exercising control. Two authors independently extracted data. The RR of serious and non-serious adverse events was estimated separately. Results: 180 Cochrane reviews were included and from these, 773 primary studies were identified. Of these, 378 studies (n=38 368 participants) reported serious adverse events and 375 studies (n=38 517 participants) reported non-serious adverse events. We found no increase in risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.96 (95%CI 0.90 to 1.02, I 2 : 0.0%) due to exercise therapy. There was, however, an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR=1.19 (95%CI 1.09 to 1.30, I 2 : 0.0%). The number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome for non-serious adverse events was 6 [95%CI 4 to 11). Conclusion: Participating in an exercise intervention increased the relative risk of non-serious adverse events, but not of serious adverse events. Exercise therapy may therefore be recommended as a relatively safe intervention. PROSPERO registration number CRD42014014819.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100461

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dawes H. The role of exercise in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:867-70.
  2. Exercise Therapy: NCBI; 2018 [Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/?term=exercise+therapy].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niemeijer, A., Lund, H., Stafne, S. N., Ipsen, T., Goldschmidt, C. L., Jørgensen, C. T., & Juhl, C. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Lund, Hans
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-09-28
Volume
54
Issue
18
Pages
1073-1080
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2975068031
Cited by
157
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
exercise therapy, adverse events, serious adverse events, non-serious adverse events, relative risk, number needed to harm
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Humans, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review