Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: An empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider

Open access
Sousa-Zomer, Thayla T., Magalhães, Lucas, Zancul, Eduardo, Cauchick-Miguel, Paulo A.·2018·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

The shift to a circular economy (CE) is associated with the need to implement innovative business models, but the adoption of circular business strategies in the industry has been limited. In fact, manufacturing companies face a range of challenges when transitioning toward such strategies, yet these challenges are rarely discussed in practice. This paper investigates the challenges faced by a manufacturing firm when implementing a circular business model and the solutions adopted to overcome them. A case-based research design was adopted in this study. The main challenges for circular business implementation faced by companies were identified in the literature and applied as lenses for examining the transition to a new circular business strategy in the company under analysis. Data analysis involved working with the data from the ground up to identify solutions for overcoming the challenges. The main findings reveal that changes needed for implementing a circular business model are achieved by integrating and engaging multiple organizational functions, each of which is complementary and mutually supportive. The involvement and collaboration of multiple stakeholders play an important role in circular business model implementation and operation. Moreover, the implementation of such models should consider specific contextual aspects of the business in question, i.e., alignment between external conditions and the business model should occur. A deeper understanding of the development of other types of circular business models in distinct contexts, and the capabilities necessary to develop and implement them, is recommended for further research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Sousa-Zomer, T. T., Magalhães, L., Zancul, E., & Cauchick-Miguel, P. A.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
135
Pages
3-13
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766420815
Cited by
189
References
6
FWCI
21.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: An empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033
The paper
Sousa-Zomer, T. T., Magalhães, L., Zancul, E., & Cauchick-Miguel, P. A. (2018). Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: An empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.