Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid fiber-to-fiber recycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate) and its dye from waste textiles without damaging their chemical structures

Mu, Bingnan, Shao, Yuanyi, McBride, Lauren, Hidalgo, Hannah, Yang, Yiqi·2023·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107102

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Achilias, 2004, The chemical recycling of PET in the framework of sustainable development, Water Air Soil Pollut. Focus, 4, 385, 10.1023/B:WAFO.0000044812.47185.0f · DOI
  2. Ahmad, 2021, Simulation and optimization of polymerization reactor for the production of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Austin Chem. Eng., 8, 1083
  3. Al-Tohamy, 2022, A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 231, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Alsabri, 2022, Environmental impacts of polypropylene (PP) production and prospects of its recycling in the GCC region, Mater. Today Proceed., 56, 2245, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.574 · DOI
  5. Arias, 2021, Instantaneous hydrolysis of PET bottles: an efficient pathway for the chemical recycling of condensation polymers, Green Chem., 23, 9945, 10.1039/D1GC02896K · DOI
  6. Bataineh, 2020, Life-cycle assessment of recycling postconsumer high-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate, Adv. Civil Eng., 2020, 1, 10.1155/2020/8905431 · DOI
  7. Bell, 2022, Directed evolution of an efficient and thermostable PET depolymerase, Nat. Catal., 5, 673, 10.1038/s41929-022-00821-3 · DOI
  8. Benavides, 2018, Exploring comparative energy and environmental benefits of virgin, recycled, and bio-derived PET bottles, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 6, 9725, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00750 · DOI
  9. Damayanti, 2021, Possibility routes for textile recycling technology, Polymers (Basel), 13, 3834, 10.3390/polym13213834 · DOI
  10. Esteve-Turrillas, 2017, Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 116, 107, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.034 · DOI
  11. Fei, 2020, Toward closed loop recycling of polyester fabric: step 1. decolorization using sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, J. Clean. Prod., 254, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120027 · DOI
  12. Ghosal, 2022, Recent advances in chemical recycling of polyethylene terephthalate waste into value added products for sustainable coating solutions–hope vs. hype, Mater. Adv., 3, 1974, 10.1039/D1MA01112J · DOI
  13. Haslinger, 2019, Upcycling of cotton polyester blended textile waste to new man-made cellulose fibers, Waste Manage., 97, 88, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.040 · DOI
  14. Işık, 2004, Monitoring of toxicity and intermediates of CI Direct Black 38 azo dye through decolorization in an anaerobic/aerobic sequential reactor system, J. Hazard. Mater., 114, 29, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.06.011 · DOI
  15. Khan, 2022, Efficient chemical recycling of waste polyethylene terephthalate, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 187, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106639 · DOI
  16. Kulkarni, 2023, Trends in polyester upcycling for diversifying a problematic waste stream, Macromolecules, 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c02054 · DOI
  17. Leal Filho, 2019, A review of the socio-economic advantages of textile recycling, J. Clean. Prod., 218, 10, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.210 · DOI
  18. Lellis, 2019, Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms, Biotechnol. Res. Innov., 3, 275, 10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Li, 2018, Cohesive energy density and solubility parameter evolution during the curing of thermoset, Polymer (Guildf), 135, 162, 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.12.002 · DOI
  20. Marullo, 2021, Amino acid-based Cholinium Ionic Liquids as sustainable catalysts for PET depolymerization, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 9, 15157, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04060 · DOI
  21. Maryan, 2015, Discoloration of denim garment with color free effluent using montmorillonite based nano clay and enzymes: nano bio-treatment on denim garment, J. Clean. Prod., 91, 208, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.014 · DOI
  22. Mo, 1995, The degree of crystallinity in polymers by wide-angle x-ray diffraction (WAXD), J. Macromol. Sci. Part C Polym. Rev., 35, 555, 10.1080/15321799508021751 · DOI
  23. Mohanty, 2022, Sustainable polymers, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers, 2, 46, 10.1038/s43586-022-00124-8 · DOI
  24. Mu, 2019, Salt-free and environment-friendly reactive dyeing of cotton in cottonseed oil/water system, Cellulose, 26, 6379, 10.1007/s10570-019-02541-7 · DOI
  25. Mu, 2023, Rational fabrication of completely amorphous chitosan-formyl-sucrose sorbents with excellent durability and regenerability for high-throughput dye removal, Chem. Eng. J., 10.1016/j.cej.2023.142134 · DOI
  26. Mu, 2022, Complete separation of colorants from polymeric materials for cost-effective recycling of waste textiles, Chem. Eng. J., 427, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131570 · DOI
  27. Nair, 2001, Final report on the safety assessment of benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid, and sodium benzoate, Int. J. Toxicol., 20, 23, 10.1080/10915810152630729 · DOI
  28. Niinimäki, 2020, The environmental price of fast fashion, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 189, 10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Savage, 2022, How to fit clothing into the circular economy, Nature, 611, S20, 10.1038/d41586-022-03651-2 · DOI
  30. Scott, 2022, Transforming textiles, Chem. Eng. News, 100, 14
  31. Singh, 2021, Techno-economic, life-cycle, and socioeconomic impact analysis of enzymatic recycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate), Joule, 5, 2479, 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.015 · DOI
  32. Singh, 2020, Synthetic microfibers: pollution toxicity and remediation, Chemosphere, 257, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127199 · DOI
  33. Thiyagarajan, 2014, Biobased furandicarboxylic acids (FDCAs): effects of isomeric substitution on polyester synthesis and properties, Green Chem., 16, 1957, 10.1039/C3GC42184H · DOI
  34. Tournier, 2020, An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles, Nature, 580, 216, 10.1038/s41586-020-2149-4 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tran, 2022, Comprehensive review on sustainable fiber reinforced concrete incorporating recycled textile waste, J. Sustain. Cement-Based Mater., 11, 28, 10.1080/21650373.2021.1875273 · DOI
  36. Yang, 2000, Removal of cyclic trimer from the surface of disperse dyed polyester, Textile Chem. Colorist Am. Dyestuff Reporter, 32
  37. Yoshioka, 1998, Kinetics of hydrolysis of PET powder in nitric acid by a modified shrinking-core model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37, 336, 10.1021/ie970459a · DOI
  38. Yousef, 2020, Sustainable green technology for recovery of cotton fibers and polyester from textile waste, J. Clean. Prod., 254, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120078 · DOI
  39. Yousef, 2019, A new strategy for using textile waste as a sustainable source of recovered cotton, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 145, 359, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.031 · DOI
  40. Zhang, 2022, Advancing life cycle sustainability of textiles through technological innovations, Nat. Sustain., 1

Metadata

Authors
Mu, B., Shao, Y., McBride, L., Hidalgo, H., & Yang, Y.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
197
Pages
107102
ISSN
0921-3449
Cited by
50
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Agricultural Research Division, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources
  • National Science Foundation (2025298)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review