The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid fiber-to-fiber recycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate) and its dye from waste textiles without damaging their chemical structures
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Textile dye genotoxicity is the biggest possible long-term risk to human health.
“Textile dye genotoxicity is the biggest possible longterm risk to human health [97,98,100,104,105].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [105]
Citations
Cites
Degradation rates of plastics in the environment
Chamas, A., Moon, H., Zheng, J., Qiu, Y., Tabassum, T., Jang, J. H., Abu-Omar, M., Scott, S. L., & Suh, S. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635 · Cited by 3,463
Micro(nano)plastics pollution and human health: How plastics can induce carcinogenesis to humans?
Kumar, R., Manna, C., Padha, S., Verma, A., Sharma, P., Dhar, A., Ghosh, A., & Bhattacharya, P. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134267 · Cited by 411
Athey, S. N., & Erdle, L. M. (2022) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5173 · Cited by 289
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Achilias, 2004, The chemical recycling of PET in the framework of sustainable development, Water Air Soil Pollut. Focus, 4, 385, 10.1023/B:WAFO.0000044812.47185.0f · DOI
- Ahmad, 2021, Simulation and optimization of polymerization reactor for the production of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Austin Chem. Eng., 8, 1083
- Al-Tohamy, 2022, A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 231, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160 · DOI · Paper page
- Alsabri, 2022, Environmental impacts of polypropylene (PP) production and prospects of its recycling in the GCC region, Mater. Today Proceed., 56, 2245, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.574 · DOI
- Arias, 2021, Instantaneous hydrolysis of PET bottles: an efficient pathway for the chemical recycling of condensation polymers, Green Chem., 23, 9945, 10.1039/D1GC02896K · DOI
- Bataineh, 2020, Life-cycle assessment of recycling postconsumer high-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate, Adv. Civil Eng., 2020, 1, 10.1155/2020/8905431 · DOI
- Bell, 2022, Directed evolution of an efficient and thermostable PET depolymerase, Nat. Catal., 5, 673, 10.1038/s41929-022-00821-3 · DOI
- Benavides, 2018, Exploring comparative energy and environmental benefits of virgin, recycled, and bio-derived PET bottles, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 6, 9725, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00750 · DOI
- Damayanti, 2021, Possibility routes for textile recycling technology, Polymers (Basel), 13, 3834, 10.3390/polym13213834 · DOI
- Esteve-Turrillas, 2017, Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 116, 107, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.034 · DOI
- Fei, 2020, Toward closed loop recycling of polyester fabric: step 1. decolorization using sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, J. Clean. Prod., 254, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120027 · DOI
- Ghosal, 2022, Recent advances in chemical recycling of polyethylene terephthalate waste into value added products for sustainable coating solutions–hope vs. hype, Mater. Adv., 3, 1974, 10.1039/D1MA01112J · DOI
- Haslinger, 2019, Upcycling of cotton polyester blended textile waste to new man-made cellulose fibers, Waste Manage., 97, 88, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.040 · DOI
- Işık, 2004, Monitoring of toxicity and intermediates of CI Direct Black 38 azo dye through decolorization in an anaerobic/aerobic sequential reactor system, J. Hazard. Mater., 114, 29, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.06.011 · DOI
- Khan, 2022, Efficient chemical recycling of waste polyethylene terephthalate, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 187, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106639 · DOI
- Kulkarni, 2023, Trends in polyester upcycling for diversifying a problematic waste stream, Macromolecules, 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c02054 · DOI
- Leal Filho, 2019, A review of the socio-economic advantages of textile recycling, J. Clean. Prod., 218, 10, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.210 · DOI
- Lellis, 2019, Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms, Biotechnol. Res. Innov., 3, 275, 10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2018, Cohesive energy density and solubility parameter evolution during the curing of thermoset, Polymer (Guildf), 135, 162, 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.12.002 · DOI
- Marullo, 2021, Amino acid-based Cholinium Ionic Liquids as sustainable catalysts for PET depolymerization, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 9, 15157, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04060 · DOI
- Maryan, 2015, Discoloration of denim garment with color free effluent using montmorillonite based nano clay and enzymes: nano bio-treatment on denim garment, J. Clean. Prod., 91, 208, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.014 · DOI
- Mo, 1995, The degree of crystallinity in polymers by wide-angle x-ray diffraction (WAXD), J. Macromol. Sci. Part C Polym. Rev., 35, 555, 10.1080/15321799508021751 · DOI
- Mohanty, 2022, Sustainable polymers, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers, 2, 46, 10.1038/s43586-022-00124-8 · DOI
- Mu, 2019, Salt-free and environment-friendly reactive dyeing of cotton in cottonseed oil/water system, Cellulose, 26, 6379, 10.1007/s10570-019-02541-7 · DOI
- Mu, 2023, Rational fabrication of completely amorphous chitosan-formyl-sucrose sorbents with excellent durability and regenerability for high-throughput dye removal, Chem. Eng. J., 10.1016/j.cej.2023.142134 · DOI
- Mu, 2022, Complete separation of colorants from polymeric materials for cost-effective recycling of waste textiles, Chem. Eng. J., 427, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131570 · DOI
- Nair, 2001, Final report on the safety assessment of benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid, and sodium benzoate, Int. J. Toxicol., 20, 23, 10.1080/10915810152630729 · DOI
- Niinimäki, 2020, The environmental price of fast fashion, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 189, 10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Savage, 2022, How to fit clothing into the circular economy, Nature, 611, S20, 10.1038/d41586-022-03651-2 · DOI
- Scott, 2022, Transforming textiles, Chem. Eng. News, 100, 14
- Singh, 2021, Techno-economic, life-cycle, and socioeconomic impact analysis of enzymatic recycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate), Joule, 5, 2479, 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.015 · DOI
- Singh, 2020, Synthetic microfibers: pollution toxicity and remediation, Chemosphere, 257, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127199 · DOI
- Thiyagarajan, 2014, Biobased furandicarboxylic acids (FDCAs): effects of isomeric substitution on polyester synthesis and properties, Green Chem., 16, 1957, 10.1039/C3GC42184H · DOI
- Tournier, 2020, An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles, Nature, 580, 216, 10.1038/s41586-020-2149-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Tran, 2022, Comprehensive review on sustainable fiber reinforced concrete incorporating recycled textile waste, J. Sustain. Cement-Based Mater., 11, 28, 10.1080/21650373.2021.1875273 · DOI
- Yang, 2000, Removal of cyclic trimer from the surface of disperse dyed polyester, Textile Chem. Colorist Am. Dyestuff Reporter, 32
- Yoshioka, 1998, Kinetics of hydrolysis of PET powder in nitric acid by a modified shrinking-core model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37, 336, 10.1021/ie970459a · DOI
- Yousef, 2020, Sustainable green technology for recovery of cotton fibers and polyester from textile waste, J. Clean. Prod., 254, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120078 · DOI
- Yousef, 2019, A new strategy for using textile waste as a sustainable source of recovered cotton, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 145, 359, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.031 · DOI
- Zhang, 2022, Advancing life cycle sustainability of textiles through technological innovations, Nat. Sustain., 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Mu, B., Shao, Y., McBride, L., Hidalgo, H., & Yang, Y.
- ORCID
- Yang, Yiqi
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 197
- Pages
- 107102
- ISSN
- 0921-3449
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 269 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Funders
- Agricultural Research Division, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources
- National Science Foundation (2025298)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review