Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesVehicle emissions and performanceClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

The impact of the corporate average fuel economy standards on technological changes in automobile fuel efficiency

Wang, Yiwei, Miao, Qing·2021·Resource and Energy Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101211
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This paper empirically examines the effect of the U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards on the technological progress in automobile fuel efficiency. Using detailed vehicle attributes data from 1978 through 2018, we find that more stringent fuel economy standards increase the rate of technological improvements in new passenger cars, and this effect is primarily driven by the response of U.S. automakers. We do not find evidence that CAFE standards have a similar effect on the technical change in light-duty trucks. Our results also indicate that higher gasoline prices have a significant and positive effect on the improvement of fuel-saving technology in both passenger cars and light trucks. Using our empirical estimates, we project that the recent rollback of Obama-era CAFE standards would forego an approximately 2-percent increase in cars’ fuel economy over the 2021-2025 period as a result of technological progress.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101211

Cites

40 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Greene, 1993, Costs and benefits of automotive fuel economy improvement: a partial equilibrium analysis, Transp. Res., 27, 217

Cited by

See all 41

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., & Miao, Q.
Affiliations
Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Miao, Qing
ORCID
Miao, Qing
Venue
Resource and Energy Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
63
Pages
101211
ISSN
0928-7655 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101211
OpenAlex
W3108469538
Cited by
38
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Resource and Energy Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rochester Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, fuel economy standards, technological change, fuel economy, passenger cars, light trucks, car manufacturers, gasoline prices, fuel-saving technology, vehicle characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.