Cited by 281Open Source Software InnovationsDigital Platforms and EconomicsIntellectual Property and Patents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Open source software development—Just another case of collective invention?

Open access
Osterloh, Margit, Rota, Sandra·2007·Research Policy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.004

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Demsetz, 1967, Towards a theory of property rights, American Economic Review, 57, 347
  2. Elster, J., 1989. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order, New York, NY. · DOI
  3. Markus, 2000, What makes a virtual organization work?, Sloan Management Review, 42, 13
  4. Moon, 2000, Essence of distributed work: the case of the Linux kernel, Firstmonday, 5
  5. Osterloh, 2004, Trust and community in open source software production. Analyse & Kritik – Zeitschrift für Sozialtheorie special issue on, Trust and Community on the Internet, 26, 279
  6. Torvalds, 1998, FM interview with Linus Torvalds: What motivates free software developers, Firstmonday, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–280 of 280

Metadata

Authors
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Osterloh, Margit
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
157-171
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121570764
Cited by
281
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
FWCI
53.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
Keywords
open source software, collective invention, innovation models, institutional innovation, common property, dominant design, patent law, developer communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review