Cited by 3,089Digital Economy and TransformationDigital Platforms and EconomicsDigital Innovation in Industries

The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes

Open access
Nambisan, Satish, Wright, Mike, Feldman, Maryann·2019·Research Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Nambisan, Satish
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
103773
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940549837
Cited by
3,089
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 794 · 2025: 633 · 2024: 557 · 2023: 459 · 2022: 299 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
231.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
digital transformation, innovation, entrepreneurship, digital technologies, digital platforms, digital infrastructure, value creation, value capture, digitization, openness, affordances, generativity, cross-level analysis, interdisciplinary research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review