Cited by 21CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Development and application of prime editing in plants

Open access
Tingting, Liu, Jinpeng, Zou, Xi, Yang, Kejian, Wang, Yuchun, Rao, Chun, Wang·2023·Rice Science

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas)-mediated genome editing has greatly accelerated progress in plant genetic research and agricultural breeding by enabling targeted genomic modifications. Moreover, the prime editing system, derived from the CRISPR/Cas system, has opened the door for even more precise genome editing. Prime editing has the capability to facilitate all 12 types of base-to-base conversions, as well as desired insertions or deletions of fragments, without inducing double-strand breaks and requiring donor DNA templet. In a short time, prime editing has been rapidly verified as functional in various plants, and can be used in plant genome functional analysis as well as precision breeding of crops. In this review, we summarize the emergence and development of prime editing, highlight recent advances in improving its efficiency in plants, introduce the current applications of prime editing in plants, and look forward to future prospects for untilizing prime editing in genetic improvement and precision molecular breeding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rsci.2023.07.005

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prime editing holds promise for fixing a broader range of genetic mutations with fewer unintended effects, potentially improving traits such as yield, pest resistance, and environmental resilience.

    “This technology holds promise for fixing a broader range of genetic mutations with fewer unintended effects, potentially improving traits such as yield, pest resistance, and environmental resilience (Liu, et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tingting, L., Jinpeng, Z., Xi, Y., Kejian, W., Yuchun, R., & Chun, W.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Yuchun, Rao
Venue
Rice Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
509-522
ISSN
1672-6308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386907591
Cited by
21
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rice Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3400200)
  • Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01-07)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
prime editing, CRISPR/Cas genome editing, plant genome editing, precision breeding, crop genetic improvement, editing efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review