Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 973

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations

Cherubini, Francesco, Bird, Neil D., Cowie, Annette, Jungmeier, Gerfried, Schlamadinger, Bernhard, Woess-Gallasch, Susanne·2009·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Azar, 2003, Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints—cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector, Energy Policy, 31, 961, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00139-8 · DOI
  2. Blottnitz von, 2007, A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective, J Cleaner Prod, 15, 607, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cai, 2001, Nitrous oxide and dinitrogen emissions from soil under different water regimes and straw amendment, Chemosphere, 42, 113, 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00116-8 · DOI
  4. Cerri CE, Cerri CC. Biofuel carbon footprint: basis for a greenhouse gas emission reduction. Presentation at Biofuels and Society Workshop; 14 November 2007.
  5. Cowie, 2006, Does soil carbon loss in biomass production systems negate the greenhouse benefits of bioenergy?, Mitigation Adapt Strat Global Change, 11, 979, 10.1007/s11027-006-9030-0 · DOI
  6. Crutzen, 2007, N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels Atmos, Chem Phys Discuss, 7, 11191
  7. Curran, 2007, Co-product and input allocation approaches for creating life cycle inventory data: a literature review, Int J LCA, 12, 65
  8. Farrell, 2006, Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals, Science, 311, 506, 10.1126/science.1121416 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, et al. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, editors. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA; 2007.
  10. Frischknecht, 2000, Allocation in life cycle inventory analysis for joint production, Int J LCA, 5, 85, 10.1007/BF02979729 · DOI
  11. Gabrielle, 1996, Analysis and field-evaluation of the CERES models’ soil components: nitrogen transfer and transformation, Soil Sci Soc Am J, 60, 142, 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010023x · DOI
  12. Gabrielle, 2008, Life-cycle assessment of straw use in bioethanol production: a case study based on biophysical modelling, Biomass Bioenergy, 32, 431, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.017 · DOI
  13. Gasol, 2007, Life cycle assessment of a Brassica carinata bioenergy cropping system in southern Europe, Biomass Bioenergy, 31, 543, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.026 · DOI
  14. GBEP. Global Bioenergy Partnership, A review of the current state of bioenergy development in G8+5 countries, GBEP Secretariat, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome 2007; website: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a1348e/a1348e00.pdf; 2007.
  15. Gebhart, 1994, The CRP increases soil organic carbon, J Soil Water Conserv, 49, 488, 10.1080/00224561.1994.12456893 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gielen, 2003, Modeling of global biomass policies, Biomass Bioenergy, 25, 177, 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00188-5 · DOI
  17. Gnansonou E, Panichelli L, Dauriat A, Villegas JD. Accounting for indirect land use changes in GHG balances of biofuels—review of current approaches, Working paper REF. 437.101, Ecole Poytechnique Federale de Lausanne, March 2008; website: http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/121496/files/Accounting_for_ILUC_in_biofuels_production.pdf (last visited: 23/06/2008); 2008.
  18. Grahn, 2007, Biomass for heat or as transportation fuel? A comparison between two model-based studies, Biomass Bioenergy, 31, 747, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.05.001 · DOI
  19. Grigal, 1998, Soil carbon changes associated with short-rotation systems, Biomass Bioenergy, 14, 371, 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10073-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Heller, 2003, Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system, Biomass Bioenergy, 25, 147, 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00190-3 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hoogwijk, 2003, Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy, Biomass Bioenergy, 25, 119, 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00191-5 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kim, 2002, Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain: I. System expansion, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 7, 237, 10.1007/BF02978879 · DOI
  23. Kim, 2005, Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel, Biomass Bioenergy, 29, 426, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.06.004 · DOI
  24. Lal, 2005, World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel, Environ Int, 31, 575, 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lal, 2008, Promise and limitations of soils to minimize climate change, J Soil Water Conserv, 63, 113, 10.2489/63.4.113A · DOI
  26. Lange, 2007, Lignocellulose conversion: an introduction to chemistry, process and economics, Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefinery, 1, 39, 10.1002/bbb.7 · DOI
  27. Larson E. A review of LCA studies on liquid biofuels for the transport sector, Scientific and technical advisory panel of the global environment facility (STAP) workshop on liquid biofuels, 29 August to 1 September 2005, New Delhi, India; 2005.
  28. Lasure LL, Ming Z. Bioconversion and biorefineries of the future. In: Rosenberg NJ, Metting FB, Izaurralde RC, editors. Applications of biotechnology to mitigation of greenhouse warming, Proceedings of the St. Michaels II Workshop; 2004.
  29. Marris, 2006, Sugar cane and ethanol: drink the best and drive the rest, Nature, 444, 670, 10.1038/444670a · DOI
  30. Melling, 2005, Methane fluxes from three ecosystems in tropical peatland of Sarawak, Malaysia, Soil Biol Biochem, 37, 1445, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.001 · DOI
  31. Mosier, 1998, Long-term large N and immediate small N addition effects on trace gas fluxes in the Colorado shortgrass steppe, Biol Fertil Soils, 28, 44, 10.1007/s003740050461 · DOI
  32. North Energy. Report to AEA for the RFA review of indirect effects of biofuels, published on RFA; website www.renewablefuelsagency.org, Renewable Fuels Agency; 2008.
  33. Ojima, 1993, Effect of land use change on methane oxidation in temperate forest and grassland soils, Chemosphere, 26, 675, 10.1016/0045-6535(93)90452-B · DOI
  34. Pimentel, 1991, Ethanol fuels: energy security, economics, and the environment, J Agric Environ Ethics, 4, 1, 10.1007/BF02229143 · DOI
  35. Pimentel, 2005, Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower, Nat Resour Res, 14, 65, 10.1007/s11053-005-4679-8 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Quintero, 2008, Fuel ethanol production from sugarcane and corn: comparative analysis for a Colombian case, Energy, 33, 385, 10.1016/j.energy.2007.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Righelato, 2007, Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests?, Science, 317, 902, 10.1126/science.1141361 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Schlamadinger, 1997, Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems, Biomass Bioenergy, 13, 359, 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10032-0 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Skjemstad, 2004, Calibration of the Rothamsted organic carbon turnover model (RothC ver. 26.3), using measurable soil organic carbon pools, Aust J Soil Res, 42, 79, 10.1071/SR03013 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Smeets, 2009, The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1230, 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.006 · DOI
  41. Stehfest, 2006, N2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: summarizing available measurement data modelling of global annual emissions, Nutrient Cycling Agroecosyst, 74, 207, 10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Tolbert, 2002, Changes in soil quality and below-ground carbon storage with conversion of traditional agricultural crop lands to bioenergy crop production, Environ Pollut, 116, 97, 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00262-7 · DOI
  43. Thustos, 1998, Short-term effects of nitrogen on methane oxidation in soils, Biol Fertil Soils, 28, 64, 10.1007/s003740050464 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Venturi, 2003, Analysis of energy comparison for crops in European agricultural systems, Biomass Bioenergy, 25, 235, 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00015-1 · DOI
  45. Wood S, Cowie A. A review of greenhouse gas emission factors for fertiliser production, IEA bioenergy task 38, June 2004, www.ieabioenergy-task38.org/publications/GHG Emission_Fertilizer %20Production_July2004.pdf (accessed 08/05/08); 2004.
  46. Wrage, 2005, A novel dual-isotope labelling method for distinguishing between soil sources of N2O, Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 19, 3298, 10.1002/rcm.2191 · DOI
  47. Zan, 2001, Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in Soothern Quebec, Agric Ecosyst Environ, 86, 135, 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00273-5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 973

Metadata

Authors
Cherubini, F., Bird, N. D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B., & Woess-Gallasch, S.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
434-447
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165053916
Cited by
973
References
11
FWCI
58.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013
The paper
Cherubini, F., Bird, N. D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B., & Woess-Gallasch, S. (2009). Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.