Cited by 492Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureVehicle emissions and performanceEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Electricity Carbon Intensity in European Member States: Impacts on GHG Emissions of Electric Vehicles

Open access
Moro, Alberto, Lonza, Laura·2018·Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Abstract

The Well-To-Wheels (WTW) methodology is widely used for policy making in the transportation sector. In this paper updated WTW calculations are provided, relying on 2013 statistic data, for the carbon intensity (CI) of the European electricity mix; detail is provided for electricity consumed in each EU Member State (MS). An interesting aspect presented is the calculation of the GHG content of electricity traded between Countries, affecting the carbon intensity of the electricity consumed at national level. The amount and CI of imported electricity is a key aspect: a Country importing electricity from another Country with a lower CI of electricity will lower, after the trade, its electricity CI, while importing electricity from a Country with a higher CI will raise the CI of the importing Country. In average, the CI of electricity used in EU at low voltage in 2013 was 447 gCO 2 eq/kWh, which is the 17% less compared to 2009. Then, some examples of calculation of GHG emissions from the use of electric vehicles (EVs) compared to internal combustion engine vehicles are provided. The use of EVs instead of gasoline vehicles can save (about 60% of) GHG in all or in most of the EU MSs, depending on the estimated consumption of EVs. Compared with diesel, EVs show average GHG savings of around 50% and not savings at all in some EU MS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.012

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. EPA, 2007. “Regulatory Impact Analysis: Renewable Fuel Standard Program Chapter 6 – Lifecycle Impacts on Fossil Energy and Greenhouse Gases”, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States, EPA420-R-07-004.
  2. European Union, 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (RED). Official Journal of the European Union 23.04.2009, L140, pp. 16–62.
  3. Itten, R. et al., 2014. Life Cycle Inventories of Electricity Mixes and Grid. Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), pp. 1–229.
  4. VTT, 2013. Vehicle Energy Efficiencies – IEA EGRD Workshop: Mobility: Technology Priorities and Strategic Urban Planning. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. < http://www.iea.org/media/workshops/2013/egrdmobility/nylund_vehicle_energy_efficiencies.pdf>.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moro, A., & Lonza, L.
Affiliations
Joint Research Centre (IT)
Corresponding author
Moro, Alberto
Venue
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
64
Pages
5-14
ISSN
1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2740559467
Cited by
492
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 28
FWCI
22.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
carbon intensity of electricity, electric vehicles, greenhouse gas emissions, cross-border electricity trade, EU member states, internal combustion engine vehicles, diesel vehicles, low-voltage electricity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review