Cited by 139Biodiesel Production and ApplicationsBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

History, evolution and environmental impact of biodiesel in Brazil: A review

De Oliveira, Fernando C., Coelho, Suani T.·2017·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.060

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brazilian biofuel production between 2005 and 2014 was estimated at 17.4 billion L, saving 12.9 billion US dollars in fossil fuel import costs.

    “For instance, Brazilian biofuel production between 2005 and 2014 was estimated at 17.4 billion L, saving 12.9 billon US dollars in fossil fuel import costs [39].”
  • The majority of the literature demonstrates that there is an unfavourable increase in NOx emissions when using biofuels as opposed to fossil fuels.

    “Additionally, despite the favourable reduction in PM, CO and VOC emissions, the majority of the literature demonstrates that there is an unfavourable increase in NO x emissions when using biofuels as opposed to fossil fuels [39,53,54].”
  • Adding up all the biodiesel consumed in Brazil since 2008, the GHG avoided emissions have already reached 21.8 million tons of CO2, equivalent to nearly 158 million trees in an area corresponding to 144 thousand football fields.

    “a recent report released by the Brazilian Department of Agriculture Livestock Supply states that by “adding up all the biodiesel consumed in Brazil since 2008, the GHG avoided emissions have already reached 21.8 million tons of CO 2 , which is equivalent to nearly 158 million trees in an area corresponding to 144 thousand football fields” [39,76].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Oliveira, F. C., & Coelho, S. T.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
75
Pages
168-179
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556260740
Cited by
139
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • CAPES
  • FAPESP (2012/51466-7, 2014/50279-4)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Keywords
biodiesel, Brazil, environmental impact, fossil fuel substitution, renewable energy policy, CO2 emissions, economic impact, biofuel production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review