Cited by 17Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Developments in integrative modeling with dynamical interfaces

Ozdemir, E Sila, Nussinov, Ruth, Gursoy, Attila, Keskin, Ozlem·2019·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Proteins are dynamic, and this holds especially for their surfaces. They display ensembles of conformations, which allows them to interact with diverse partners, often via the same patch of surface, and execute their distinct functions. Binding a specific partner can stimulate - or suppress - a distinct signaling pathway. This diversity poses a challenge: how to reliably model a specific protein-protein interaction (PPI)? This problem is compounded in protein assemblies, which are typically large, involving multiple protein-protein interfaces. Integrative modeling (IM), which combines diverse data, has emerged as the most promising strategy; however, modeling dynamical interfaces, often at the detailed level, which are at the heart of reliable predictions of assemblies, still poses a challenge. Here we review hurdles and advances in integrative modeling of dynamical interfaces; while some could have been predicted or expected, others transformed modeling in unanticipated ways. We further comment on what we believe could be possible future advances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.10.007

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global flexibility is an important consideration for docking approaches.

    “While the global flexibility (multiplicity of conformations of the overall structure), may not be a problem for a number of protein docking cases (see above), in general, it is an important consideration for the docking approaches [20].”

    From Challenges in protein docking (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozdemir, E. S., Nussinov, R., Gursoy, A., & Keskin, O.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
56
Pages
11-17
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902942225
Cited by
17
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health
  • Intramural Research Program of NIH, Frederick National Lab, Center for Cancer Research
  • TUBITAK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
integrative modeling, protein-protein interfaces, protein-protein interaction, protein assembly, protein dynamics, conformational ensembles, protein-protein interface prediction
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review