Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance in Healthcare Services

Open access
Platis, Ch., Reklitis, P., Zimeras, S.·2015·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

In an environment of tension and division of labor such as Healthcare Services, the performance of employees is one of the most basic challenges. The reason is that performance as a phenomenon is closely related to aspects of effectiveness, knowledge management and quality from one side and to management, financing and development of the organization from the other. Especially for doctors and nurses performance issues are inextricably linked to patient safety. The international literature shows that a large number of factors influence employee performance such as satisfaction from the profession, work environment, compensation policies, etc. In this work we try to analyze the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance. The analysis takes place in the National Centre of Public Administration and Local Government during the training process, where a questioner with 7-Likert scale is distributed to 246 personnel (nurses). The analysis is taking place between job satisfaction parameters versus self-job performance parameters. Principal components analysis suggests that for job satisfaction the most important parameters are (based on their weights): satisfaction from manager (weight=0.703), satisfaction form manager administration (weight=0.732), satisfaction of ways of working (weight=0.657), satisfaction of recognition (weight=0.627), satisfactory of working hours (weight=0.695) and satisfactory of working security (weight=0.707). For the self - job performance most important parameters are (based on their weights): self-satisfaction of quantity of work (weight=0.896), self-satisfaction of productivity (weight=0.878), self-satisfaction of initiatives (weight=0.794), self-satisfaction of working targets (weight=0.766), and self-satisfaction of quality improvements (weight=0.792).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1226

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Metadata

Authors
Platis, C., Reklitis, P., & Zimeras, S.
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
175
Pages
480-487
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964253905
Cited by
289
References
55
FWCI
27.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance in Healthcare Services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1226
The paper
Platis, C., Reklitis, P., & Zimeras, S. (2015). Relation between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance in Healthcare Services. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1226

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.