Cited by 78Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Are cervical cancer screening rates different for women with schizophrenia? A Manitoba population-based study

Martens, Patricia J., Chochinov, Harvey Max, Prior, Heather J., Fransoo, Randall, Burland, Elaine·2009·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Context Barriers to cervical cancer screening (Pap tests) may exist for women experiencing schizophrenia.Design This study analyzed healthcare records of all women in the province of Manitoba, Canada to: (a) compare cervical cancer screening rates of women with and without schizophrenia; and (b) determine factors associated with screening uptake.Setting This study took place in Manitoba, Canada, utilizing anonymized universal administrative data in the Population Health Research Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.Participants All females aged 18-69 living in Manitoba December 31, 2002, excluding those diagnosed with invasive or in situ cervical cancer in the study period or previous 5 years.Main outcome To determine factors associated with Papanicolaou (Pap) test uptake (1+ Pap test in 3 years, 2001/02-2003/04), logistic regression modeling included: diagnosis of schizophrenia, age, region, average household income, continuity of care (COC), presence of major physical comorbidity. Good COC was defined as at least 50% of ambulatory physician visits from the same general/family practitioner within two years.Results Women with schizophrenia (n=3220) were less likely to have a Pap test (58.8% vs. 67.8%, p<.0001) compared to all other women (n=335 294). In the logistic regression, a diagnosis of schizophrenia (aOR=0.70, 95% CI 0.65-0.75); aged 50+, and living in a low-income area or the North decreased likelihood; good continuity of care (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.85-1.91) and greater physical comorbidity (1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.41) increased likelihood.Conclusion Women with schizophrenia are less likely to receive appropriate cervical cancer screening. Since good continuity of care by primary care physicians may mitigate this, psychiatrists should consider assisting in ensuring screening uptake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2009.04.015

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martens, P. J., Chochinov, H. M., Prior, H. J., Fransoo, R., & Burland, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • CancerCare Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Martens, Patricia J.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
101-106
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064604869
Cited by
78
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Manitoba, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Probability, Retrospective Studies, Schizophrenia, Logistic Models, Community Health Planning, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review