Cited by 22Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Diabetic retinopathy screening in persons with mental illness: a literature review

Open access
Bradley, Elinor Rhian, Delaffon, Vijay·2020·BMJ Open Ophthalmology

Abstract

People living with severe mental illness (SMI) have an increased risk of developing diabetes and are less likely to spontaneously report physical health concerns; they may therefore derive greater benefit from attending screening to prevent diabetic retinopathy. We conducted a literature review to consider the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) in people with mental illness. People with a diagnosis of SMI and those with self-reported mental ill-health have reduced attendance at DRS, within the context of poorer compliance with general diabetic care. Anxiety and depression were noted as barriers in attending DRS. People living with SMI require additional support to benefit from preventative health programmes such as DRS. Further research could support a better understanding of barriers to attendance, allowing effective support systems to be developed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000437

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assessment of the psychological status of DR patients helps identify their psychological problems and provides appropriate targeted psychological interventions to improve quality of life and clinical outcomes.

    “Assessment of the psychological status of DR patients helps identify their psychological problems, and provides appropriate and targeted psychological interventions to improve the quality of life and clinical outcomes.[15–17]”

    From The effect of psychotherapy on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with diabetic retinopathy: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results and Discussion identify depression, anxiety and other mental-health factors as potential barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening, and the Discussion calls for better understanding of those barriers to inform helpful solutions. The paper does not show that assessing the psychological status of patients with diabetic retinopathy leads to targeted psychological interventions or improves quality of life or clinical outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Taylor DM, Barnes TR, Young AH The Maudsley prescribing guidelines in psychiatry. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
  2. [38]Jeste DV, Gladsjo JA, Lindamer LA, et al Medical comorbidity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22: 413– 30. 10.1093/schbul/22.3.413 8873293 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradley, E. R., & Delaffon, V.
Affiliations
Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Bradley, Elinor Rhian
Venue
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-05
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
e000437
ISSN
2397-3269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3032967196
Cited by
22
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open Ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy screening, severe mental illness, diabetes risk, screening uptake, anxiety, depression, preventive medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review