Cited by 65Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Metacognitive training for schizophrenia: A multicentre randomised controlled trial

Briki, Malick, Monnin, Julie, Haffen, Emmanuel, Sechter, Daniel, Favrod, Jérôme, Netillard, Christian, Cheraitia, Elisabeth, Marin, Karine +10 more·2014·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

A psychotherapeutic approach for schizophrenia is now recommended as an adjuvant for psychopharmacology, since antipsychotic medications only have a partial impact especially as regards positive symptoms and insight. In addition, cognitive distortions and the lack of metacognitive skills might increase positive symptoms leading to poor social functioning. This underlines the need for specific approaches which target cognitive processes relevant for insight, and abilities in metacognition. Metacognitive training (MCT) is a structured group intervention, which enhances a patient's reflection on cognitive biases and improves problem-solving. The aim of our study was to assess MCTs' short term impact on insight, symptoms and quality of life. Fifty patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders and persistent positive symptoms (delusions or hallucinations) were enrolled in the study. After baseline assessment participants were randomised either to supportive therapy or MCT. Both groups used the same design (1h-session twice a week during 8weeks) although the basic knowledge given to participants was different between interventions. Participants were assessed at eight weeks based on the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales, the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the Quality of Life Scale. Between-group differences were significant in favour of MCT on the PANSS positive sca…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.005

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briki, M., Monnin, J., Haffen, E., Sechter, D., Favrod, J., Netillard, C., Cheraitia, E., Marin, K., Govyadovskaya, S., Tio, G., Bonin, B., Chauvet-Gelinier, J.-C., Leclerc, S., Hodé, Y., Vidailhet, P., Berna, F., Bertschy, A. Z., & Vandel, P.
Affiliations
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • Centre hospitalier de Rouffach (FR)
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
157
Issue
1-3
Pages
99-106
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003175150
Cited by
65
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
metacognitive training, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Delusions, Female, France, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Thinking, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review