Cited by 68Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Evidence for interventions to improve and maintain occupational performance and participation for people with serious mental illness: A systematic review

D’Amico, Mariana L., Jaffe, Lynn E., Gardner, Jennifer A.·2018·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. This systematic review evaluates the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions within the scope of occupational therapy to improve and maintain performance and participation for people with serious mental illness. Areas included in this review are activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, leisure, social participation, and rest and sleep. METHOD. Databases searched included MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, OTseeker, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Reviewers read and assessed citations, abstracts, and full-text articles for inclusion and analysis. RESULTS. Sixty-one articles were selected for inclusion. The review yielded strong evidence for psychoeducation and occupation- and cognitive-based interventions, moderate evidence for skills-based interventions, and limited evidence for technology-supported interventions. CONCLUSION. Results of this review support use of evidence-based practice within the scope of occupational therapy, inclusion of occupational therapy practitioners as mental health service providers, and continued research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.2018.033332

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D’Amico, M. L., Jaffe, L. E., & Gardner, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Lynn E. Jaffe, ScD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Professor and Program Director, Florida Gulf State University, Fort Myers
  • Kean University (US)
Corresponding author
D’Amico, Mariana L.
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2018-08-02
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
627-638
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2885865594
Cited by
68
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
severe mental illness, occupational therapy intervention, occupational performance, participation, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, leisure, social participation (health and rehabilitation), sleep and rest, psychoeducation, cognitive intervention, skills-based intervention, technology-based interventions, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Leisure Activities, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Rest, Self Care, Sleep, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Practice, Social Participation, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review