Cited by 16Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Community treatment order: identifying the need for more evidence based justification of its use in first episode psychosis patients

Morandi, Stéphane, Golay, Philippe, Lambert, Martin, Schimmelmann, Benno G, McGorry, Patrick D, Cotton, Sue M, Conus, Philippe·2017·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Objectives Community Treatment Order (CTO) is a legal regime that obliges patients suffering mental disorder to adhere to treatment in the community and allows for a swift admission to hospital if necessary. Study aims were to: (i) determine CTO frequency in a large representative sample of first episode psychosis (FEP) patients; (ii) compare the characteristics of patients with or without CTO before entry, during treatment and at discharge from an early psychosis program.Methods Information on 660 patients treated at the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) between 1998 and 2000 was collected from medical files.Results 19.2% of patients were under CTO at least once during treatment and they differed on most pre-treatment, baseline, treatment and service discharge variables. They were less educated, more likely to have a history of offending behavior, had lower pre-morbid functioning, longer duration of untreated psychosis, increased prevalence and more persistent substance use disorders, greater severity of symptoms, lower functioning, poorer insight at any time during treatment and were more likely to be admitted to hospital.Conclusions CTO frequency was high, likely related to the representativeness of the cohort. Characteristics of patients on CTO are comparable to those with serious and persistent mental illness. Considering the absence of solid evidence regarding the effectiveness of this form of compulsion, it is crucial to study the use of CTO in FEP patients in order to explore its impact and identify patients for whom it may be beneficial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2016.12.022

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morandi, S., Golay, P., Lambert, M., Schimmelmann, B. G., McGorry, P. D., Cotton, S. M., & Conus, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Morandi, Stéphane
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
185
Pages
67-72
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561681737
Cited by
16
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship (APP1061998)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
community treatment orders, first-episode psychosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Practice, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review