The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biochar stability assessment methods: A review
Abstract
Biochar is being developed as a candidate with great potential for climate change mitigation. Sequestering biochar carbon in soil contributes greatly to the reduction of greenhouse gases emissions, and biochar stability is the most decisive factor that determines its carbon sequestration potential. However, methods that can be used universally for direct or indirect assessment of biochar stability are still under investigation. This present review aims to give comprehensive and detailed up-to-date information on the development of biochar stability assessment methods. The method details, advantages and disadvantages, along with the correlations between different methods were reviewed and discussed. Three stability assessment method categories were identified: I) biochar C structure analysis, II) biochar oxidation resistance determination, and III) biochar persistence evaluation by biochar incubation and mineralization rate modelling. Biochar persistence value (e.g., mean residence time, MRT) obtained from incubation and modelling and biochar elemental ratios such as H/Corg and O/Corg are the current most commonly used biochar stability indicators. Incubation and modelling method is too time-consuming while H/Corg and O/Corg ratios are qualitative and conservative, although the effectiveness of these two methods can be further improved. On the other hand, biochar C structures such as aromaticity and degree of aromatic condensation obtained from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis and benzene polycarboxylic acids (BPCA) molecular markers and biochar oxidation/degradation recalcitrance obtained from proximate analysis (volatile matter and fixed carbon yields), thermal recalcitrance index (R50), and H2O2- and heat-assisted oxidation (Edinburgh stability tool) are being developed as promising proxies to indicate biochar stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic Molecular Structure of Plant Biomass-Derived Black Carbon (Biochar)
Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Johnson, M. G., & Kleber, M. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9031419 · Cited by 3,230
Lehmann, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/447143a · Cited by 2,477
Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions
Tan, X., Liu, Y., Zeng, G., Wang, X., Hu, X., Gu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058 · Cited by 2,081
Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils
Zimmerman, A. R., Gao, B., & Ahn, M.-Y. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.005 · Cited by 1,438
Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects
Wang, J., Xiong, Z., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12266 · Cited by 1,316
Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios
Spokas, K. A. (2010) · Carbon Management · doi:10.4155/cmt.10.32 · Cited by 1,160
Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance
Enders, A., Hanley, K., Whitman, T., Joseph, S., & Lehmann, J. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022 · Cited by 1,113
Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar)
Zimmerman, A. R. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903140c · Cited by 1,103
Biochar Carbon Stability in a Clayey Soil As a Function of Feedstock and Pyrolysis Temperature
Singh, B. P., Cowie, A. L., & Smernik, R. J. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302545b · Cited by 623
Harvey, O. R., Kuo, L.-J., Zimmerman, A. R., Louchouarn, P., Amonette, J. E., & Herbert, B. E. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2040398 · Cited by 429
Cited by
An overview on engineering the surface area and porosity of biochar
Leng, L., Xiong, Q., Yang, L., Li, H., Zhou, Y., Zhang, W., Jiang, S., Li, H., & Huang, H. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144204 · Cited by 1,314
Self-citationYaashikaa, P. R., Kumar, P. S., Varjani, S., & Saravanan, A. (2020) · Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570 · Cited by 1,132
Biochar in climate change mitigation
Lehmann, J., Cowie, A., Masiello, C. A., Kammann, C., Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Cayuela, M. L., Camps-Arbestain, M., & Whitman, T. (2021) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-021-00852-8 · Cited by 970
Wang, L., O’Connor, D., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Shen, Z., & Hou, D. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c04033 · Cited by 655
Past, present, and future of biochar
Chen, W., Meng, J., Han, X., Lan, Y., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-019-00008-3 · Cited by 552
Metadata
- Authors
- Leng, L., Huang, H., Li, H., Li, J., & Zhou, W.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 647
- Pages
- 210-222
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887514966
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 39.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochar stability assessment methods: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.402
- The paper
- Leng, L., Huang, H., Li, H., Li, J., & Zhou, W. (2019). Biochar stability assessment methods: A review. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.