Cited by 50Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Do concentrations of perfluoroalkylated acids (PFAAs) in isopods reflect concentrations in soil and songbirds? A study using a distance gradient from a fluorochemical plant

Groffen, Thimo, Eens, Marcel, Bervoets, Lieven·2019·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Perfluoroalkylated acids (PFAAs) are persistent chemicals that have been detected globally in the environment and in wildlife. Although it is known that PFAAs sorb to solid matrices, little is known on PFAA concentrations in soils. PFAA pollution has often been studied in aquatic invertebrates. However, this has rarely been done on terrestrial species. In the present study, we examined whether the concentrations of 15 PFAAs in isopods (Oniscidae), collected at a fluorochemical plant and in four other areas, representing a gradient in distance from the pollution source (1 km to 11 km), were related to those in the soil and in eggs of a songbird, the great tit (Parus major), collected in the same areas. Additionally, we examined the effect of physicochemical properties such as total organic carbon (TOC) and clay content on the relationship between the concentrations in soil and isopods. Finally, we examined the composition profile in the soil and isopods. Mean PFOS and PFOA concentrations of 1700 ng/g dw and 24 ng/g dw were detected in the soil at the plant. PFOS and PFPeA were the dominant PFAAs in isopods and were detected at mean concentrations of 253 and 108 ng/g ww, respectively. The great tit eggs showed elevated mean PFOS concentrations of 55,970 ng/g ww. In most cases, PFAA concentrations decreased with increasing distance from the plant. As PFAA concentrations in isopods were correlated with concentrations in the soils, isopods could serve as a bioindicator for PFAA concentrations in soils. Additionally, there were indications that isopods could also serve as a bioindicator for PFAA concentrations in eggs of great tits. However, these indications were only the case at two locations, showing the need to further monitor the possibilities of using isopods as a bioindicator for PFAA concentrations in song bird eggs. CAPSULE: Elevated PFAA concentrations in isopods reflected concentrations in songbird eggs and in soil, indicating that trophic transfer of PFAAs from soil, via isopods, to songbirds might play a role in the PFAA exposure of terrestrial songbirds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.072

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary sources of soil PFAS contamination include direct releases such as AFFF during firefighting training, leaks or spills during storage/handling/cleaning, direct discharges from industries, and landfill leachate seepage.

    “Primary sources include direct releases, such as the use of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) during firefighting training exercises in designated areas (FFTAs), along with leaks or spills during the storage, handling, or cleaning of these foams [155]. Other primary sources involve direct discharges from industries that produce or use fluorinated chemicals [156] and landfill leachate seepage.”

    From Industrial Applications, Environmental Fate, Human Exposure, and Health Effects of PFAS (2025) · cites this paper as [156]

    The citation [155] is attached to the sentence about firefighting foams, not the later statement about industrial discharges and landfill leachate. The PFAA concentrations section describes contaminated soil at a firefighting training facility where aqueous film-forming foams were used, supporting that example. The cited paper does not address leaks or spills during foam storage, handling, or cleaning. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groffen, T., Eens, M., & Bervoets, L.
Affiliations
University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Groffen, Thimo
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
657
Pages
111-123
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904549493
Cited by
50
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
FWO (G038615N)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
Isopoda, Oniscidae, soil contamination, Parus major, bioindicators, trophic transfer, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFPeA, distance gradient, total organic carbon, clay content, persistent organic pollutants
MeSH terms
Animals, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Songbirds, Isopoda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review