Cited by 387Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Sorption behaviour of perfluoroalkyl substances in soils

Milinovic, Jelena, Lacorte, Silvia, Vidal, Miquel, Rigol, Anna·2015·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The sorption behaviour of three perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS), was studied in six soils with contrasting characteristics, especially in the organic carbon content. Sorption isotherms were obtained by equilibrating the soil samples with 0.01 mol L(-1) CaCl2 solutions spiked with increasing concentrations of the target PFAS. The sorption reversibility of PFASs was also tested for some of the samples. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify the target PFASs in the solutions. Both the Freundlich and linear models were appropriate to describe the sorption behaviour of PFASs in soils, and enabled us to derive solid-liquid distribution coefficients (Kd) for each compound in each soil. Kd values increased from 19 to 295 mL g(-1) for PFOS, from 2.2 to 38 mL g(-1) for PFOA and from 0.4 to 6.8 mL g(-1) for PFBS, and were positively correlated with the organic carbon content of the soil. KOC values obtained from the correlations were 710, 96 and 17 mL g(-1) for PFOS, PFOA and PFBS, respectively. Whereas Kd values decreased in the sequence PFOS>PFOA>PFBS, desorption yields were lower than 13% for PFOS, from 24 to 58% for PFOA, and from 32 to 60% for PFBS. This shows that the physicochemical characteristics of PFASs, basically their hydrophobicity, controlled their sorption behaviour in soils, with PFOS being the most irreversibly sorbed PFAS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.017

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milinovic, J., Lacorte, S., Vidal, M., & Rigol, A.
Affiliations
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Rigol, Anna
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
511
Pages
63-71
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050350408
Cited by
387
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (CTM 2008-01147/TECNO, CTM 2011\u201327211)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2009SGR1188, 2010FI_B 00513)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFBS, soil sorption, sorption isotherms, Freundlich isotherm, distribution coefficient, organic carbon content, sorption reversibility, desorption, hydrophobicity, soil contamination
MeSH terms
Caprylates, Fluorocarbons, Models, Chemical, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Absorption, Physicochemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review