CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occurrence of tire and bitumen wear microplastics on urban streets and in sweepsand and washwater

Järlskog, Ida, Strömvall, Ann-Margret, Magnusson, Kerstin, Gustafsson, Mats, Polukarova, Maria, Galfi, Helen, Aronsson, Maria, Andersson-Sköld, Yvonne·2020·Science of The Total Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138950
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138950

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 The location of Gothenburg (left panel), Kattegat and the basin of the river Göta älv (centre panel) and the studied catchment area (right panel) with the swept streets (yellow) and the locations where WDS and stormwater samples were collected (arrows). Map tiles to the right by Stamen Design, under, CC BY 3.0. Data by OpenStreetMap, under, ODbL. 2.1.
Fig. 1 The location of Gothenburg (left panel), Kattegat and the basin of the river Göta älv (centre panel) and the studied catchment area (right panel) with the swept streets (yellow) and the locations where WDS and stormwater samples were collected (arrows). Map tiles to the right by Stamen Design, under, CC BY 3.0. Data by OpenStreetMap, under, ODbL. 2.1.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 left: WDS II (Photo Mats Gustafsson, VTI). On the right: Schematic figure over WDS sampling procedure for size distribution, road dust load and loss of ignition (WT = wheel track; BW=between the wheel track; K = adjacent to the kerb; MP = samples for microplastics adjacent to the kerb).
Fig. 2 left: WDS II (Photo Mats Gustafsson, VTI). On the right: Schematic figure over WDS sampling procedure for size distribution, road dust load and loss of ignition (WT = wheel track; BW=between the wheel track; K = adjacent to the kerb; MP = samples for microplastics adjacent to the kerb).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Precipitation and stormwater sampling occasions. The red dots show the days when stormwater sampling was performed. Data collected from SMHI's open source data base (SMHI, 2019).
Fig. 3 Precipitation and stormwater sampling occasions. The red dots show the days when stormwater sampling was performed. Data collected from SMHI's open source data base (SMHI, 2019).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 to the left: Pictures A and B show paint particles from sweepsand. C shows rubber particles from sweepsand, and D shows rubber particles from washwater. Picture top right: bitumen particles before and after heating. Bottom picture: rubber particles before and after heating. Photos by Kerstin Magnusson, IVL Swedish Research Institute.
Fig. 4 to the left: Pictures A and B show paint particles from sweepsand. C shows rubber particles from sweepsand, and D shows rubber particles from washwater. Picture top right: bitumen particles before and after heating. Bottom picture: rubber particles before and after heating. Photos by Kerstin Magnusson, IVL Swedish Research Institute.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Road dust load (DL180 (g/m 2 ) content before and after sweeping.The bars show the mean values with error bars from the bulk triplicate samples taken in wheel tracks (WT) and triplicate between wheel tracks (BW). The kerb samples relate to single samples.
Fig. 5 Road dust load (DL180 (g/m 2 ) content before and after sweeping.The bars show the mean values with error bars from the bulk triplicate samples taken in wheel tracks (WT) and triplicate between wheel tracks (BW). The kerb samples relate to single samples.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 6 Size distribution of road dust particles in samples taken adjacent to the kerb (grey lines) and between wheel tracks (red lines) from the sampling on the 2018-03-26 (left) and 201804-19 (right). The unit on the y-axis is based on the size distribution presented as the proportion of total particle volume and has been summed for particles up to 2000 μ m.
Fig. 6 Size distribution of road dust particles in samples taken adjacent to the kerb (grey lines) and between wheel tracks (red lines) from the sampling on the 2018-03-26 (left) and 201804-19 (right). The unit on the y-axis is based on the size distribution presented as the proportion of total particle volume and has been summed for particles up to 2000 μ m.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 7 The different groups of microplastics ≥ 100 μ midentified in each type of sample; were density separated with NaCl (sweepsand, autumn 2017) or NaI (WDS, washwater and sweepsand, spring 2018), washwater (autumn 2017) and all stormwater was analysed without any density separation. NB! the y-axis is logarithmic.
Fig. 7 The different groups of microplastics ≥ 100 μ midentified in each type of sample; were density separated with NaCl (sweepsand, autumn 2017) or NaI (WDS, washwater and sweepsand, spring 2018), washwater (autumn 2017) and all stormwater was analysed without any density separation. NB! the y-axis is logarithmic.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 8 Concentrations (number/L) of TWP and bitumen microparticles ≥ 100 μ m) in samples collected with the WDS before and after sweeping on the 2018-03-26 and 2018-04-19. (All samples density separated with NaI).
Fig. 8 Concentrations (number/L) of TWP and bitumen microparticles ≥ 100 μ m) in samples collected with the WDS before and after sweeping on the 2018-03-26 and 2018-04-19. (All samples density separated with NaI).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 9 TBMPandTWP ≥ 100 μ minsamples from sweepsand collected between 2017--08-17 and 2018-04-19. Light bars depict No. of particles/kg dw when separated with NaCl Dark bars depict No. of particles/kg dw when density separated with NaI.
Fig. 9 TBMPandTWP ≥ 100 μ minsamples from sweepsand collected between 2017--08-17 and 2018-04-19. Light bars depict No. of particles/kg dw when separated with NaCl Dark bars depict No. of particles/kg dw when density separated with NaI.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 10 Concentrations (number/L) of TBMP ≥ 100 μ minwashwatercollectedbetween the 2017-08-17 and the 2018-04-19. No distinction between TWP and bitumen was made. (Samples from 2017 was filtered without density separation and samples from 2018 with NaI).
Fig. 10 Concentrations (number/L) of TBMP ≥ 100 μ minwashwatercollectedbetween the 2017-08-17 and the 2018-04-19. No distinction between TWP and bitumen was made. (Samples from 2017 was filtered without density separation and samples from 2018 with NaI).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 11 Plastic, paint and TBMP in stormwater, measured as flow-weighted rain event mean concentration. Boxes to the left relate to particles ≥ 20 μ mand boxes to the right show particles ≥ 100 μ m. (No density separation of the samples).
Fig. 11 Plastic, paint and TBMP in stormwater, measured as flow-weighted rain event mean concentration. Boxes to the left relate to particles ≥ 20 μ mand boxes to the right show particles ≥ 100 μ m. (No density separation of the samples).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Abdel-Wahab, 2011, Experimental determination of optimum gutter brush parameters and road sweeping criteria for different types of waste, Waste Manag., 31, 1109, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.014 · DOI
  2. Amato, 2010, A review on the effectiveness of street sweeping, washing and dust suppressants as urban PM control methods, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 3070, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.025 · DOI
  3. Andrady, 2011, Microplastics in the marine environment, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 1596, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Auta, 2017, Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions, Environ. Int., 102, 165, 10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barboza, 2015, Microplastics in the marine environment: current trends and future perspectives, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 97, 5, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.008 · DOI
  6. Bogacki, 2018, The impact of street cleaning on particulate matter air concentrations: a case study of a street canyon in Krakow (Poland), E3S Web Conf, 45, 10.1051/e3sconf/20184500009 · DOI
  7. Councell, 2004, Tire-Wear particles as a source of zinc to the environment, Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 4206, 10.1021/es034631f · DOI
  8. Egodawatta, 2007, Mathematical interpretation of pollutant wash-off from urban road surfaces using simulated rainfall, Water Res., 41, 3025, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.037 · DOI
  9. Eisentraut, 2018, Two birds with one stone—fast and simultaneous analysis of microplastics: microparticles derived from thermoplastics and tire wear, Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 5, 608, 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00446 · DOI
  10. Gustafsson, 2019, Road dust load dynamics and influencing factors for six winter seasons in Stockholm, Sweden, Atmospheric Environment: X, 2, 100014, 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100014 · DOI
  11. Imhof, 2012, A novel, highly efficient method for the separation and quantification of plastic particles in sediments of aquatic environments, Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 10, 524, 10.4319/lom.2012.10.524 · DOI
  12. Jiang, 2018, Occurrence of microplastics and its pollution in the environment: a review, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 13, 16, 10.1016/j.spc.2017.11.003 · DOI
  13. Klöckner, 2019, Tire and road wear particles in road environment - quantification and assessment of particle dynamics by Zn determination after density separation, Chemosphere, 222, 714, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.176 · DOI
  14. Kole, 2017, Wear and tear of tyres: a stealthy source of microplastics in the environment, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14, 10.3390/ijerph14101265 · DOI
  15. Kreider, 2010, Physical and chemical characterization of tire-related particles: comparison of particles generated using different methodologies, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 652, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.016 · DOI
  16. Lau, 2005, Metals and PAHs adsorbed to street particles, Water Res., 39, 4083, 10.1016/j.watres.2005.08.002 · DOI
  17. Liu, 2019, Microplastics in urban and highway stormwater retention ponds, Sci. Total Environ., 671, 992, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.416 · DOI
  18. Lundberg, 2019, Wet dust sampler—a sampling method for road dust quantification and analyses, Water Air Soil Pollut., 230, 180, 10.1007/s11270-019-4226-6 · DOI
  19. Murakami, 2004, Modelling of runoff behaviour of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from roads and roofs, Water Res., 38, 4475, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.023 · DOI
  20. Norman, 2006, Studies of some measures to reduce road dust emissions from paved roads in Scandinavia, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6154, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.022 · DOI
  21. Panko, 2013, Measurement of airborne concentrations of tire and road wear particles in urban and rural areas of France, Japan, and the United States, Atmos. Environ., 72, 192, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.040 · DOI
  22. Polukarova, 2020, Organic pollutants, nano- and microparticles in street sweeping road dust and washwater, Environ. Int., 135, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105337 · DOI
  23. Rhodes, 2012, Zinc leaching from tire crumb rubber, Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 12856, 10.1021/es3024379 · DOI
  24. Sofi, 2018, Effect of waste tyre rubber on mechanical and durability properties of concrete – a review, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9, 2691, 10.1016/j.asej.2017.08.007 · DOI
  25. Sommer, 2018, Tire abrasion as a major source of microplastics in the environment, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 18, 2014, 10.4209/aaqr.2018.03.0099 · DOI
  26. Sutton, 2016, Microplastic contamination in the San Francisco Bay, California, USA, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 109, 230, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.077 · DOI
  27. Unice, 2012, Use of a deuterated internal standard with pyrolysis-GC/MS dimeric marker analysis to quantify tire tread particles in the environment, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 9, 4033, 10.3390/ijerph9114033 · DOI
  28. Unice, 2013, Comparison of tire and road wear particle concentrations in sediment for watersheds in France, Japan, and the United States by quantitative pyrolysis GC/MS analysis, Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 8138
  29. Unice, 2019, Characterizing export of land-based microplastics to the estuary - part I: application of integrated geospatial microplastic transport models to assess tire and road wear particles in the seine watershed, Sci. Total Environ., 646, 1639, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.368 · DOI
  30. Unice, 2019, Characterizing export of land-based microplastics to the estuary - part II: sensitivity analysis of an integrated geospatial microplastic transport modeling assessment of tire and road wear particles, Sci. Total Environ., 646, 1650, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.301 · DOI
  31. Valotto, 2015, Environmental and traffic-related parameters affecting road dust composition: a multi-technique approach applied to Venice area (Italy), Atmos. Environ., 122, 596, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.006 · DOI
  32. Vanegas Useche, 2010, Effectiveness of gutter brushes in removing street sweeping waste, Waste Manag., 30, 174, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.036 · DOI
  33. Vanegas-Useche, 2015, Effectiveness of oscillatory gutter brushes in removing street sweeping waste, Waste Manag., 43, 28, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.014 · DOI
  34. Vanegas-Useche, 2018, Determination of the normal contact stiffness and integration time step for the finite element modeling of bristle-surface interaction, Computers, Materials & Continua, 56, 169
  35. Vanegas-Useche, 2019, Dynamic analysis of a horizontal oscillatory cutting brush, Computers, Materials & Continua, 60, 871, 10.32604/cmc.2019.06480 · DOI
  36. Wagner, 2018, Tire wear particles in the aquatic environment - a review on generation, analysis, occurrence, fate and effects, Water Res., 139, 83, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.051 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Wijesiri, 2016, Understanding the uncertainty associated with particle-bound pollutant build-up and wash-off: a critical review, Water Res., 101, 582, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.013 · DOI
  38. Zhao, 2013, Understanding the relationship between heavy metals in road-deposited sediments and washoff particles in urban stormwater using simulated rainfall, J. Hazard. Mater., 246-247, 267, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.035 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Järlskog, I., Strömvall, A.-M., Magnusson, K., Gustafsson, M., Polukarova, M., Galfi, H., Aronsson, M., & Andersson-Sköld, Y.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
729
Pages
138950
ISSN
0048-9697
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138950
Cited by
269
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • VINNOVA (2018-00652)
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2017-00720)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review