Cited by 131Urban Agriculture and SustainabilityInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics SystemsLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Cultivating sustainable and healthy cities: A systematic literature review of the outcomes of urban and peri-urban agriculture

Open access
Rao, Nitya, Patil, Sheetal, Singh, Chandni, Roy, Parama, Pryor, Charles, Poonacha, Prathigna, Genes, Mariam·2022·Sustainable Cities and Society

Abstract

Despite considerable interest in urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) in recent decades, its contributions to urban sustainability and human wellbeing remain contested. This systematic literature review examines the geographical landscape of the peer-reviewed literature on UPA and assesses its reported outcomes on sustainability and wellbeing. Following systematic review protocols, we undertook a two-step literature screening and quality assessment process. From a total of 4029 articles, based inclusion-exclusion criteria, we filtered 320 articles for quantitative and 86 for qualitative assessment. Quantitative analysis confirmed an exponential increase in literature on UPA since 2015 and a regional bias towards the Global North. The qualitative analysis identified six thematic outcomes of UPA under three sustainability pillars - environmental sustainability; material well-being; labour and livelihoods; land tenure and urban planning; and food and nutritional security as part of economic sustainability; and subjective and relational wellbeing as well as gender and social differentiation as elements of social sustainability. Environmental sustainability was most discussed, followed by subjective wellbeing and food and nutritional security. Gender and social differentiation issues were least represented in the papers. There remain knowledge gaps around how urban policy and planning can recognise, leverage, and scale up the sustainability and wellbeing co-benefits of UPA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104063

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NbS is widely framed as an umbrella concept that brings together disparate but related research and applications.

    “NbS is widely framed as an umbrella concept that brings together disparate but related research and applications of urban forestry, green and blue infrastructure, urban agriculture, ecosystem services, ecosystem-based adaptation and disaster risk reduction, and sustainable urban water drainage systems (5, 22, 23).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

    Section 3.2.1 says urban and peri-urban agriculture is increasingly discussed as a nature-based solution, and the Introduction describes it as a green-infrastructure option. The paper does not establish that NbS is widely framed as an umbrella concept bringing together the full range of fields and applications listed in the citing sentence. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Positive benefits of NbS on human well-being from engaging with gardening and urban agriculture and employing NbS to lower health risks and vulnerabilities are supported.

    “This is further supported by positive benefits of NbS on human well-being (47, 63) from engaging with gardening and urban agriculture in general (22, 63) and employing NbS to lower health risks and vulnerabilities (30).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Delpino-Chamy, M., Alarcon, M., Fernández, S., & Soto, J. (2019). Methodology to identify and assess agroecological practices in metropolitan areas. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 14(2). www.witpress.com/author s/submit-a-journal-paper.
  2. Mancebo, Francois, & Certomà, C. (2019). Planning Urban Futures: Addressing the Sustainability-Justice Nexus in the Light of Urban Agriculture. Urban climate politics. agency and empowerment (pp. 135-151). Cambridge University Press. http://hdl. handle.net/2318/1791284.
  3. Patil, S., Dhanya, B., Vanjari, R. S., & Purushothaman, S. (2018). Urbanisation and new agroecologies: The story of Bengaluru's peripheries. Economic and Political Weekly, 53(41), 71-77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions

    McPhearson, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Ossola, A., Diep, L., Anderson, P. M. L., Blatch, T., Collier, M. J., Cook, E. M., Culwick Fatti, C., Grabowski, Z. J., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2315910121 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

    “…) show that even though the review of review findings provided strong evidence for synthesized key challenges ( SI Appendix , Table S1 ), actions to tackle them require regional insights to ensure fit - for - context methods, approaches, and strategies to advance the knowledge and science of NbS.”
    Self-citation

Authors
Rao, N., Patil, S., Singh, C., Roy, P., Pryor, C., Poonacha, P., & Genes, M.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Azim Premji University (IN)
  • Indian Institute for Human Settlements (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
  • Ardhi University (TZ)
Corresponding author
Rao, Nitya
Venue
Sustainable Cities and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
85
Pages
104063
ISSN
2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285404735
Cited by
131
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainable Cities and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Academy
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
urban and peri-urban agriculture, urban sustainability, human well-being, environmental sustainability, food and nutrition security, land tenure, urban planning, subjective well-being, urban policy, knowledge gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review