Cited by 142Hedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

G-protein-coupled receptors, Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia

Open access
Mukhopadhyay, Saikat, Rohatgi, Rajat·2014·Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology

Abstract

The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway has become an important model to study the cell biology of primary cilia, and reciprocally, the study of ciliary processes provides an opportunity to solve longstanding mysteries in the mechanism of vertebrate Hh signal transduction. The cilium is emerging as an unique compartment for G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling in many systems. Two members of the GPCR family, Smoothened and Gpr161, play important roles in the Hh pathway. We review the current understanding of how these proteins may function to regulate Hh signaling and also highlight some of the critical unanswered questions being tackled by the field. Uncovering GPCR-regulated mechanisms important in Hh signaling may provide therapeutic strategies against the Hh pathway that plays important roles in development, regeneration and cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.05.002

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 145 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–142 of 142

Metadata

Authors
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Rohatgi, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mukhopadhyay, Saikat
  • Rohatgi, Rajat
Venue
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
33
Pages
63-72
ISSN
1084-9521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986320552
Cited by
142
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH Common Fund
  • Pew Foundation
  • Sontag Foundation
  • March of Dimes Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
Hedgehog signaling, primary cilia, G protein-coupled receptors, Smoothened, GPR161, cancer therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Cilia, Humans, Signal Transduction, Body Patterning, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Hedgehog Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review