Cited by 28Sleep and related disordersClimate Change and Health ImpactsCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Sleep and the human impacts of climate change

Obradovich, Nick, Migliorini, Robyn·2018·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.09.002

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obradovich, N., & Migliorini, R.
Affiliations
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Obradovich, Nick
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
42
Pages
1-2
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893421230
Cited by
28
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
sleep, climate change, human health effects, sleep disorders, environmental change
MeSH terms
Health Status, Humans, Sleep, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review