Cited by 33Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsSleep and related disorders

Rapid maxillary expansion versus watchful waiting in pediatric OSA: A systematic review

Open access
Fernández-Barriales, Marcos, Lafuente-Ibáñez de Mendoza, Irene, Alonso-Fernández Pacheco, Juan Julián, Aguirre-Urizar, José Manuel·2022·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Spontaneous resolution of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may stand behind the observed benefit of rapid maxillary expansion (RME), mainly supported by uncontrolled case series. We aimed to review the controlled, ideally randomized, evidence on the effectiveness of RME as compared to watchful waiting or alternative treatment of pediatric OSA. We only found one randomized clinical trial comparing RME with watchful waiting. The other four studies compared RME with the gold-standard treatment adenotonsillectomy, three of them in a non-randomized fashion. The results of the RCT showed no statistically significant differences in the enhancement of main (apnea hypopnea index, AHI) and secondary outcomes between RME and watchful waiting. Furthermore, reproducibility of the published studies was limited by insufficient description of their patients' inclusion criteria. We could not find convincing evidence of the benefit of RME over watchful waiting in patients with pediatric OSA. RCTs with reproducible inclusion criteria comparing RME with watchful waiting are still critically needed to support this intervention for the treatment of pediatric OSA. In the absence of solid evidence with RCT, RME should not be recommended for the treatment of pediatric OSA. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021249261. RUNNING SUMMARY: This systematic review explores the benefits of rapid maxillary expansion compared to spontaneous resolution of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101609

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Pirelli P, Saponara M, Guilleminault C. Forcierte Gaumennahterweiterung vor und nach Adenotonsillektomie bei Kindern mit obstruktiver Schlafapnoe. Somnologie 2012;16(2):125e32. Available from, https://art.torvergata.it/ retrieve/handle/2108/71829/268477/ARTICOLO%20SOMNOLOGIE%202012. pdf.
  2. At the request of the corresponding (first) author, the editors of Sleep are retracting the following paper and erratum: Guilleminault C, Quo S, Huynh NT, Li K. Orthodontic expansion treatment and adenotonsillectomy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in prepubertal children. Sleep;31(7): 953-957 and Erratum to Guilleminault C, Quo S, Huynh NT, Li K. Orthodon- tic expansion treatment and adenotonsillectomy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in prepubertal children. Sleep;31(7):953-957, in Sleep 2009;32(1):6. Sleep. 2010 Jan;33(1):8.
  3. Pliska B, Pauwels N, Chadha N. Maxillary Expansion Treatment for OSA in chil- dren a pilot study (197:A2006). San Diego, CA. In: Proceedings of the American thoracic society 2018 international conference; May 20, 2018. Available from, https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2018.197.1_ MeetingAbstracts.A2006. [Accessed 27 September 2021]. · DOI
  4. Chan K. The Hong Kong child cohort (HKCC), in (S-09) developmental sleep co- horts: trajectories and impact of sleep disordered breathing and EEG biomarkers from infancy to adulthood. Dissertation presented at: SLEEP 2021. Virtual event June 10-13; 2021. Available from, https://www.eventscribeapp.com/live/ videoPlayer.asp?lsfp¼ZFdOTU1NRjUwRnU0enMxZ 0VFSHRVc21yQk5qQndqUkhYMllwMDU1N0ZuMD0¼. [Accessed 13 June 2021].
  5. Proffit W, Fields H, Sarver D. In: Dolan J, Nebel J, editors. Contemporary or- thodontics. 4th ed. Mosby Elsevier; 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández-Barriales, M., Lafuente-Ibáñez de Mendoza, I., Alonso-Fernández Pacheco, J. J., & Aguirre-Urizar, J. M.
Affiliations
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
62
Pages
101609
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211110298
Cited by
33
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
rapid maxillary expansion, pediatric obstructive sleep apnea, expectant management, adenotonsillectomy, spontaneous resolution, apnea-hypopnea index, treatment effectiveness, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Adenoidectomy, Child, Humans, Palatal Expansion Technique, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Watchful Waiting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review