Cited by 255Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in pediatric sleep-disordered breathing: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Katyal, Vandana, Pamula, Yvonne, Martin, A. James, Daynes, Cathal N., Kennedy, J. Declan, Sampson, Wayne J.·2013·American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Abstract

Introduction Pediatric sleep-disordered breathing is a continuum, with primary snoring at one end, and complete upper airway obstruction, hypoxemia, and obstructive hypoventilation at the other. The latter gives rise to obstructive sleep apnea. An important predisposing factor in the development and progression of pediatric sleep-disordered breathing might be craniofacial disharmony. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the association between craniofacial disharmony and pediatric sleep-disordered breathing.Methods Citations to potentially relevant published trials were located by searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The MetaRegister of controlled trials database was also searched to identify potentially relevant unpublished trials. Additionally, hand-searching, Google Scholar searches, and contact with experts in the area were undertaken to identify potentially relevant published and unpublished studies. Inclusion criteria were (1) randomized controlled trials, case-control trials, or cohort studies with controls; (2) studies in nonsyndromic children 0 to 18 years of age with a diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing or obstructive sleep apnea by either a sleep disorders unit, screening questionnaire, or polysomnography; and (3) principal outcome measures of craniofacial or upper airway dimensions or proportions with various modalities of imaging for the craniofacial and neck regions. The quality of the studies selected was evaluated by assessing their methodologies. Treatment effects were combined by meta-analysis with the random-effects method.Results Children with obstructive sleep apnea and primary snoring show increased weighted mean differences in the ANB angle of 1.64° (P <0.0001) and 1.54° (P <0.00001), respectively, compared with the controls. An increased ANB angle was primarily due to a decreased SNB angle in children with primary snoring by 1.4° (P = 0.02). Children with obstructive sleep apnea had a distance from the posterior nasal spine to the nearest adenoid tissue measured along the PNS-basion line reduced by 4.17 mm (weighted mean difference) (P <0.00001) and a distance from the posterior nasal spine to the nearest adenoid tissue measured along the line perpendicular to the sella-basion line reduced by 3.12 mm (weighted mean difference) (P <0.0001) compared with the controls.Conclusions There is statistical support for an association between craniofacial disharmony and pediatric sleep-disordered breathing. However, an increased ANB angle of less than 2° in children with obstructive sleep apnea and primary snoring, compared with the controls, could be regarded as having marginal clinical significance. Therefore, evidence for a direct causal relationship between craniofacial structure and pediatric sleep-disordered breathing is unsupported by this meta-analysis. There is strong support for reduced upper airway width in children with obstructive sleep apnea. Larger well-controlled trials are required to address the relationship of craniofacial and upper airway morphology to pediatric sleep-disordered breathing in all 3 dimensions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.08.021

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oral breathing due to nasal insufficiency modifies upper airway dynamics, displacing the mandible, tongue, and soft palate posteriorly, reducing the caliber of the upper airway.

    “oral breathing due to nasal insufficiency modifies UA dynamics, displacing the mandible, tongue, and soft palate posteriorly, reducing the caliber of the UA.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katyal, V., Pamula, Y., Martin, A. J., Daynes, C. N., Kennedy, J. D., & Sampson, W. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Women's and Children's Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
143
Issue
1
Pages
20-30.e3
ISSN
0889-5406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060176797
Cited by
255
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
pediatric sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea, upper airway morphology, primary snoring, ANB angle, SNB angle, posterior nasal spine, adenoids, airway obstruction, children, craniofacial imaging, posterior fossa volume, airway cross-sectional area
MeSH terms
Adenoids, Adolescent, Cephalometry, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Hypertrophy, Infant, Larynx, Nose, Pharynx, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Likelihood Functions, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review