Cited by 74Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesBody Contouring and Surgery

Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients

McVay, Megan A., Friedman, Kelli E., Applegate, Katherine L., Portenier, Dana D.·2013·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract

Background Multidisciplinary care after bariatric surgery is important for long-term safety and optimal weight loss, yet many patients do not attend follow-up appointments. We sought to identify demographic, psychosocial, and weight-related variables that were associated with medical and behavioral health appointment attendance after bariatric surgery.Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted with consecutive patients (n=538) obtaining first-time Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery between August 2009 and August 2010. Demographic and psychosocial data were compared between high (>50%) and low (≤50%) medical appointment attendees and high (>50%) and low (≤50%) behavioral health group attendees in their first postoperative year. Percentage excess weight loss at 6 months after surgery was evaluated as a predictor of 12-month appointment attendance.Results High medical appointment attendees were more likely to be older, be Caucasian, and have lower phobic anxiety than low medical appointment attendees. High behavioral health attendees had shorter travel distance to the clinic and lower levels of hostility, anxiety, and phobic anxiety compared with low attendees. In multivariate analyses, race/ethnicity and phobic anxiety remained significant predictors of medical attendance, while travel distance to clinic predicted behavioral health attendance. Six-month percent excess weight loss predicted medical appointment attendance at 12 months.Conclusion The identified predictors of poor attendance at medical and behavioral bariatric surgery follow-up appointments should inform efforts to increase follow-up and improve surgical outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.005

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McVay, M. A., Friedman, K. E., Applegate, K. L., & Portenier, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University Health System (US)
Corresponding author
McVay, Megan A.
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
956-962
ISSN
1550-7289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971920121
Cited by
74
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32HS000079)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y, Attitude to Health, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Compliance, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Gastric Bypass, Health Behavior, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review