Cited by 60Migration, Health and TraumaRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

John Henryism, self-reported physical health indicators, and the mediating role of perceived stress among high socio-economic status Asian immigrants

Haritatos, Jana, Mahalingam, Ramaswami, James, Sherman A.·2007·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between John Henryism (a strong behavioral predisposition to engage in high effort coping with difficult barriers to success) and self-reported physical health among high socio-economic (SES) status Asian immigrants to the USA. Cross-sectional data were collected from a community sample of 318 self-identified Chinese and Indian immigrants aged 18-73, averaging 10.2 yr lived in the US. In addition to the John Henryism Active Coping Scale, health status was measured using ordinal ratings of global self-rated health, somatic symptoms and physical health functioning. We also evaluated whether perceived stress would explain the relationship between John Henryism and health. Controlling for demographic factors, regression analyses showed that higher John Henryism significantly predicted better self-rated health and physical functioning, and fewer somatic symptoms. These relationships were significantly and fully mediated (for physical functioning and somatic symptoms) or partially mediated (for self-rated health) by lower perceived stress. Results suggest that John Henryism relates to better health among high SES Asian immigrants in part by reducing perceived stress. To better understand and improve health in all racial/ethnic groups, especially racial minorities and immigrants, more research is needed on John Henryism and perceived stress as important psychosocial mechanisms intervening between environmental exposures and health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.037

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haritatos, J., Mahalingam, R., & James, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Haritatos, Jana
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
1192-1203
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065256373
Cited by
60
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH019391)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
John Henryism, perceived stress, self-rated health, physical function, somatic symptoms, Asian immigrants, Chinese immigrants, Indian immigrants, mediation, racial and ethnic minorities
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Asia, Southeastern, Asian, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emigration and Immigration, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Social Class, Stress, Psychological, United States, Midwestern United States, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review