Cited by 85Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The Differential Moderating Roles of Self-Compassion and Mindfulness in Self-Stigma and Well-Being Among People Living with Mental Illness or HIV

Yang, Xue, Mak, Winnie W. S.·2017·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0635-4

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, X., & Mak, W. W. S.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Mak, Winnie W. S.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-11-12
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
595-602
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2555543640
Cited by
84
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • the University Direct Grant of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (2021054, 2021091)
  • Social Welfare Development Fund (R03)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-compassion, self-stigma, life satisfaction, subjective well-being, mental illness recovery, people living with HIV, stigma reduction, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review